Lightning Bolt: the official album thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Rank Lightning Bolt

5 stars
1
1%
4 stars
4
5%
3 stars
29
37%
2 stars
30
38%
1 star
14
18%
 
Total votes: 78

User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

stip wrote:
harmless wrote:
Thejambi wrote:
WtOB? wrote:
stip wrote:I hate to say it but cold confession, despite being a great song, may not have fit on s/t. It is a small, intimate song that would be out of place on a record full of big gestures
The record is only full of "big gestures" because they're the songs they chose to include. By the looks of it it could have been a completely different album had they included songs like these and probably a few others that missed out too.
Very true.
This band is full of nothing but what they perceive as "big gestures" now, fearing anything with any nuance. Was 'Hummus' a big gesture? Was it fuck.

we've heard 3 songs from Lightning Bolt. Only one is a big gesture song. future days seems to be the exact opposite, and mind your manners is too much of a straight line to grandstand.
'Future Days' is a *huge gesture* song. Don't get me wrong, a song doesn't have to be loud and bombastic to be making a big gesture. It just needs to be aiming to catch the lowest common denominator in terms of sentiment. Let's make what sounds like a saccharine cheesy love song that everyone bland and boring and hopelessly in love will take with them on honeymoon. It's a big gesture song. I might not hate everything about it, I might end up liking it and even using it in my own romantic life, but let's be honest, it's a ham-fisted inclusion in the Disney Song genre. Now which was the other song which wasn't a big gesture song?
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Thejambi »

harmless wrote:
stip wrote:
harmless wrote:
Thejambi wrote:
WtOB? wrote:
stip wrote:I hate to say it but cold confession, despite being a great song, may not have fit on s/t. It is a small, intimate song that would be out of place on a record full of big gestures
The record is only full of "big gestures" because they're the songs they chose to include. By the looks of it it could have been a completely different album had they included songs like these and probably a few others that missed out too.
Very true.
This band is full of nothing but what they perceive as "big gestures" now, fearing anything with any nuance. Was 'Hummus' a big gesture? Was it fuck.

we've heard 3 songs from Lightning Bolt. Only one is a big gesture song. future days seems to be the exact opposite, and mind your manners is too much of a straight line to grandstand.
'Future Days' is a *huge gesture* song. Don't get me wrong, a song doesn't have to be loud and bombastic to be making a big gesture. It just needs to be aiming to catch the lowest common denominator in terms of sentiment. Let's make what sounds like a saccharine cheesy love song that everyone bland and boring and hopelessly in love will take with them on honeymoon. It's a big gesture song. I might not hate everything about it, I might end up liking it and even using it in my own romantic life, but let's be honest, it's a ham-fisted inclusion in the Disney Song genre. Now which was the other song which wasn't a big gesture song?
Someone flipped the Harmless switch.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

Thejambi wrote:
harmless wrote:
stip wrote:
harmless wrote:
Thejambi wrote:
WtOB? wrote:
stip wrote:I hate to say it but cold confession, despite being a great song, may not have fit on s/t. It is a small, intimate song that would be out of place on a record full of big gestures
The record is only full of "big gestures" because they're the songs they chose to include. By the looks of it it could have been a completely different album had they included songs like these and probably a few others that missed out too.
Very true.
This band is full of nothing but what they perceive as "big gestures" now, fearing anything with any nuance. Was 'Hummus' a big gesture? Was it fuck.

we've heard 3 songs from Lightning Bolt. Only one is a big gesture song. future days seems to be the exact opposite, and mind your manners is too much of a straight line to grandstand.
'Future Days' is a *huge gesture* song. Don't get me wrong, a song doesn't have to be loud and bombastic to be making a big gesture. It just needs to be aiming to catch the lowest common denominator in terms of sentiment. Let's make what sounds like a saccharine cheesy love song that everyone bland and boring and hopelessly in love will take with them on honeymoon. It's a big gesture song. I might not hate everything about it, I might end up liking it and even using it in my own romantic life, but let's be honest, it's a ham-fisted inclusion in the Disney Song genre. Now which was the other song which wasn't a big gesture song?
Someone flipped the Harmless switch.
I kind of wish we hadn't got these b-sides. I've been in denial.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by stupidmop »

S/T and Backspacer are the albums the band wanted to make, i just don't understand why. Why that want that sound to be the one to define them for 10 years. They should have listened to Mike, EPs are the way to go. At least we'd have both sides of the musical spectrum then.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

They, or just Ed? I can't help thinking that everyone else has sounded the opposite of excited about the new stuff.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by stupidmop »

Have we heard ed say anything about the new stuff except when he introduced the songs in wrigley?

If ed was calling the shots, and the rest of the band weren't happy, i'd hope they'd fight for the better music...
User avatar
broken iris
Future Drummer
Posts: 2868
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:24 pm
Location: Death Machine Inc's HQ

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by broken iris »

So much hate for "Future Days" after one performance in rather extraordinary circumstances. I can totally see it being a song covered by teenagers strumming guitars in coffee houses and there's not a damn thing wrong with that.
the sentinel remains vigilant
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by EJ »

I really can't imagine Stone wanting these demos bumped from the album. (i.e. go listen to Moonlander.)
User avatar
---
Future Drummer
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by --- »

EJ wrote:I really can't imagine Stone wanting these songs bumped from the album. (i.e. go listen to Moonlander.)
Do you really think it's a coincidence that Moonlander's lead track is "I Need Something Different?"
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

I am totally fucking certain that anyone-who-isn't-Ed feels claustrophobic and stuck in this dead-end Inside Job of a band. My theory for years has been that Matt, while being technically brilliant (and these b-sides prove it -- he sounds great), he's just really bored with every song so he only plays the bare minimum.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by stupidmop »

They're a bunch of grown men, how fucking hard can ed be to work with? Tell him to sit down and shut the fuck up for a second.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35420
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Strat »

harmless wrote:I am totally fucking certain that anyone-who-isn't-Ed feels claustrophobic and stuck in this dead-end Inside Job of a band. My theory for years has been that Matt, while being technically brilliant (and these b-sides prove it -- he sounds great), he's just really bored with every song so he only plays the bare minimum.

Matt is just playing to the types of songs they are writing. There aint much he can do with some of these songs.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

Strat wrote:
harmless wrote:I am totally fucking certain that anyone-who-isn't-Ed feels claustrophobic and stuck in this dead-end Inside Job of a band. My theory for years has been that Matt, while being technically brilliant (and these b-sides prove it -- he sounds great), he's just really bored with every song so he only plays the bare minimum.

Matt is just playing to the types of songs they are writing. There aint much he can do with some of these songs.
Technically, rhythmically, there's nothing more demanding about these b-sides than what we're getting though. They are no harder to play. They're just rock songs. Matt pulls out all the stops when he's inspired and interested.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Thejambi »

harmless wrote:
Strat wrote:
harmless wrote:I am totally fucking certain that anyone-who-isn't-Ed feels claustrophobic and stuck in this dead-end Inside Job of a band. My theory for years has been that Matt, while being technically brilliant (and these b-sides prove it -- he sounds great), he's just really bored with every song so he only plays the bare minimum.

Matt is just playing to the types of songs they are writing. There aint much he can do with some of these songs.
Technically, rhythmically, there's nothing more demanding about these b-sides than what we're getting though. They are no harder to play. They're just rock songs. Matt pulls out all the stops when he's inspired and interested.
Binaural/RA Matt was brilliant.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by EJ »

stupidmop wrote:They're a bunch of grown men, how fucking hard can ed be to work with? Tell him to sit down and shut the fuck up for a second.

I think this the general scenario is Stone writes a song like Let It Ride with lyrics. Ed does a few takes with it and ultimately decides he doesn't "feel it", so the band quietly doesn't revisit it. It just sits in the background.

On a song like Cold Confession - I think this may have been written about his breakup with Beth. Maybe, Ed just didn't want to revisit those memories? But, having said that, I think this track would have the most likelihood of being included on Lightning Bolt. The themes could probably be adapted to it.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

Thejambi wrote:
harmless wrote:
Strat wrote:
harmless wrote:I am totally fucking certain that anyone-who-isn't-Ed feels claustrophobic and stuck in this dead-end Inside Job of a band. My theory for years has been that Matt, while being technically brilliant (and these b-sides prove it -- he sounds great), he's just really bored with every song so he only plays the bare minimum.

Matt is just playing to the types of songs they are writing. There aint much he can do with some of these songs.
Technically, rhythmically, there's nothing more demanding about these b-sides than what we're getting though. They are no harder to play. They're just rock songs. Matt pulls out all the stops when he's inspired and interested.
Binaural/RA Matt was brilliant.
I agree. Because they're great songs, though again, not more difficult than present material. Maybe the 'type of song' argument is relevant but only (imo) in as much as they are pop songs rather than serious rock songs, so Matt thinks that the bare clichéd minimum is actually what suits them better.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by stupidmop »

EJ wrote:
stupidmop wrote:They're a bunch of grown men, how fucking hard can ed be to work with? Tell him to sit down and shut the fuck up for a second.

I think this the general scenario is Stone writes a song like Let It Ride with lyrics. Ed does a few takes with it and ultimately decides he doesn't "feel it", so the band quietly doesn't revisit it. It just sits in the background.

On a song like Cold Confession - I think this may have been written about his breakup with Beth. Maybe, Ed just didn't want to revisit those memories? But, having said that, I think this track would have the most likelihood of being included on Lightning Bolt. The themes could probably be adapted to it.
Then they shouldn't be unhappy with what they're putting out. I just hope that if they were unhappy with it , they'd fight ed over it.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46239
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by BurtReynolds »

lightning bolt who?
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Thejambi »

BurtReynolds wrote:lightning bolt who?
I'll enjoy it for what it is but damn.

I'd probably prefer the band just cover Moonlander with Stone producing it.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
Obbster
Banned from the Pit
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue July 23, 2013 3:45 pm
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Obbster »

Future days doesn't sound too bad. Although I do feel that it would fit an Ed solo album better than a pearl jam track.

Lightning bolt - I'm not sure of this one. It will live or die based on the studio version. I'm not loving the chorus.
"It's chowdah! Chowdah!! I'll kill you! I'll kill all of you! Especially those of you in the jury!"
Post Reply