Song of the Moment: Mind Your Manners

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Mind Your Manners

5 Stars
85
31%
4 Stars
117
43%
3 Stars
37
14%
2 Stars
23
8%
1 Star
10
4%
 
Total votes: 272

User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by Lament »

Does anyone else wish after the call and response vocals at the end they'd go back into the riff from the very beginning of the song, or is it just me?
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by dimejinky99 »

Lament wrote:Does anyone else wish after the call and response vocals at the end they'd go back into the riff from the very beginning of the song, or is it just me?
I was just saying the same thing on the previous page but the two time signatures jar against each other too much.

He could have sang it in that intro timing I think. Would have left more room for some exploration of melody like we see in the two choruses.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by harmless »

dimejinky99 wrote:
Lament wrote:Does anyone else wish after the call and response vocals at the end they'd go back into the riff from the very beginning of the song, or is it just me?
I was just saying the same thing on the previous page but the two time signatures jar against each other too much.

He could have sang it in that intro timing I think. Would have left more room for some exploration of melody like we see in the two choruses.
I don't think they jar too much. Basically the intro is just a half-time version of most of the song, i.e. the song is in 2/4 and the intro is in 4/4. They're essentially the same 'tempo' so they could change from one to the other in exactly the same way if they found a clever enough transition.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Tass Man
A Return To Form
Posts: 203
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:48 pm
Location: Mississauga, Ontario

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by Tass Man »

stip wrote:
Tass Man wrote:Initially I thought I really liked it, but it may have just been the "newness" because I haven't really gone out of my way to listen to it since it came out. Aside from the 5-10 times I heard it that first weekend, I don't think I've listened since.. I actually forget how a lot of it goes.
I've had the opposite feeling. I liked it, but didn't love it at first, when I played it 50 times or whatever over two days. Since then I probably put it one once or twice a day, and as the song has become more and more familiar and comfortable I find I like it more. It's not a 5 star song, but I am pretty confident it is 4.
See if I were to rank this song, I'd probably rank it the same as you, but I just don't have a desire to go and listen to it, and I'm not sure why. I'm thinking maybe its because I want the album. Most of my music listening is full albums so that's my only guess.

Even when I think about Ole, I was one of the few that liked that song, but again I don't go seek it out to listen to it and its probably because it's a stand alone track that's not associated with an album.

The thing I'm trying to figure out is if I was like this with previous albums/singles. I don't really remember, but I know with WWS and The Fixer, as soon as I got the albums, I rarely listened to those songs and I assume that's because I overplayed those songs during the lead up to the album. So maybe I'm subconsciously not trying to burn MYM out by the time the album comes out so I can still enjoy it.
Old username = chino

Playlist
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by Lament »

dimejinky99 wrote:
Lament wrote:Does anyone else wish after the call and response vocals at the end they'd go back into the riff from the very beginning of the song, or is it just me?
I was just saying the same thing on the previous page but the two time signatures jar against each other too much.

He could have sang it in that intro timing I think. Would have left more room for some exploration of melody like we see in the two choruses.
I must have missed that post. But yeah, I feel like if they found a way to go from the call and response (and I have no doubt if Matt really wanted to he could), it would've made for a much more impactful ending to the song.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by stip »

maybe It's a really cool part, but closing on the extended hell scream works well as a full stop
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43430
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by VinylGuy »

Ed vocals are great on this one. They grow in every new listen.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by harmless »

I'm still feeling pretty good about this song but the production could go either way.

The best chance we have of this album being produced with any depth is probably the ambient piece in the tour video. That kind of sound was not present on Backspacer.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by Monkey_Driven »

VinylGuy wrote:Ed vocals are great on this one. They grow in every new listen.
Agree. I like this song a lot more than I did on the initial listen.
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by Thejambi »

harmless wrote:I'm still feeling pretty good about this song but the production could go either way.

The best chance we have of this album being produced with any depth is probably the ambient piece in the tour video. That kind of sound was not present on Backspacer.
I think The title track has potential for a full sound. I expect it to be slower and the guitar work is pretty layered.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43430
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by VinylGuy »

Monkey_Driven wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:Ed vocals are great on this one. They grow in every new listen.
Agree. I like this song a lot more than I did on the initial listen.
They are agressive enough and he sounds very very good.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36767
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by Jorge »

Ed's vocals are my favorite thing about this song.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
benton netty
Yeah Yeah Yeah
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 6:07 pm

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by benton netty »

Lament wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
Lament wrote:Does anyone else wish after the call and response vocals at the end they'd go back into the riff from the very beginning of the song, or is it just me?
I was just saying the same thing on the previous page but the two time signatures jar against each other too much.

He could have sang it in that intro timing I think. Would have left more room for some exploration of melody like we see in the two choruses.
I must have missed that post. But yeah, I feel like if they found a way to go from the call and response (and I have no doubt if Matt really wanted to he could), it would've made for a much more impactful ending to the song.
I initially felt like the intro riff should pop in after the solo, and before the last chorus. Maybe after the dead stop?
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43430
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by VinylGuy »

Im not that crazy about the stop, i think its the weakest moment of the song. Im still loving the intro and Mike solo.
The live renditions has been pretty cool too.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by dimejinky99 »

Dublins alternative station have been playing the shit out of this. And I like it more each time I hear it.

Eds sounding really great. Singing from Right down in his chest.
Good times.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by EJ »

Ed really shines on this song - some well executed gut-punch moments.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by McParadigm »

After fourteen days at radio...

Week 1: 1,641 plays, estimated audience size of 8.6
Week 2: 2,550 plays, estimated audience size of 8.62

It's interesting that, while it has increased its number of plays at alternative radio (typically the format Pearl Jam most dominates), its audience size shrank quite a bit there. This means that some of the format's larger stations gave it a little bit of a shot last week, then dropped it from their playlist. The may come back to it if it can break into the top ten there (it's at #12 right now, up from #16 after the first seven days).
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
southp
AnalLog
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 4:22 pm
Location: Montreal

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by southp »

EJ wrote:Ed really shines on this song - some well executed gut-punch moments.
The best part about his delivery is that little edge of insanity that he's channeling from the Ed of yesteryear.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by stip »

McParadigm wrote:After fourteen days at radio...

Week 1: 1,641 plays, estimated audience size of 8.6
Week 2: 2,550 plays, estimated audience size of 8.62

It's interesting that, while it has increased its number of plays at alternative radio (typically the format Pearl Jam most dominates), its audience size shrank quite a bit there. This means that some of the format's larger stations gave it a little bit of a shot last week, then dropped it from their playlist. The may come back to it if it can break into the top ten there (it's at #12 right now, up from #16 after the first seven days).
what does estimated audience size mean?
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: Mind Your Manners

Post by Monkey_Driven »

I have yet to hear this on any of the local stations. They played the shit out of the Fixer when it was released.
Post Reply