I like the Final Cut, personally. It is closest to what the director originally wanted.Strat wrote:Goddammit. I still need to watch the original.
I shall download it for my trip. Which cut, folks?
Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Every environment felt fully realized down to the last detail. All of them have such dramatic lighting and atmosphere and texture. All of them are unique but somehow all hang together as well. Each is it's own thing but all of it combines for a cohesive whole. The visuals are breathtaking and do so much of the heavy lifting. The characters/actors get to live and thrive and breath in those scenes in a visceral and real way. Just outstanding.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yes, I should have given him credit as well. The Vegas scenes were fantastic.durdencommatyler wrote:LV can poop on him all he wants, but Roger Deakins is so fucking good, it's sickening.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Glad you liked it. I just saw it for a second time on Monday, wanted to see it one more time in the theater to see if I missed anything. After second watch:durdencommatyler wrote:This movie is outstanding. Every frame pops. Every frame is vital. It's such a gorgeous film, too. Absolutely see this in a theater if you can. It's one of the rare sequels that can totally stand on its own but also revitalizes and enhances the original. Very few complaints/issues with this movie. It's stunning, stellar, and smart. And I'll echo earlier comments that it has more heart than the original, too.
Also, I know I was expecting great cinematography from Villeneuve, especially after Arrival, but man, he really blew it out of the water here. And the score. Man. I want to see it a third time.
- Spoiler: show
- Spoiler: show
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
I've actually still never seen the Final Cut. But I've seen the theatrical cut and the Director's Cut. Of those two, absolutely watch the Director's Cut. The Theatrical Cut is garbage by comparison. It's a waste of time.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I like the Final Cut, personally. It is closest to what the director originally wanted.Strat wrote:Goddammit. I still need to watch the original.
I shall download it for my trip. Which cut, folks?
Everyone I know swears by the Final Cut. So listen to Ruddo and do that one.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Yes, that scene was fantasticdurdencommatyler wrote:Every environment felt fully realized down to the last detail. All of them have such dramatic lighting and atmosphere and texture. All of them are unique but somehow all hang together as well. Each is it's own thing but all of it combines for a cohesive whole. The visuals are breathtaking and do so much of the heavy lifting. The characters/actors get to live and thrive and breath in those scenes in a visceral and real way. Just outstanding.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yes, I should have given him credit as well. The Vegas scenes were fantastic.durdencommatyler wrote:LV can poop on him all he wants, but Roger Deakins is so fucking good, it's sickening.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Glad you liked it. I just saw it for a second time on Monday, wanted to see it one more time in the theater to see if I missed anything. After second watch:durdencommatyler wrote:This movie is outstanding. Every frame pops. Every frame is vital. It's such a gorgeous film, too. Absolutely see this in a theater if you can. It's one of the rare sequels that can totally stand on its own but also revitalizes and enhances the original. Very few complaints/issues with this movie. It's stunning, stellar, and smart. And I'll echo earlier comments that it has more heart than the original, too.
Also, I know I was expecting great cinematography from Villeneuve, especially after Arrival, but man, he really blew it out of the water here. And the score. Man. I want to see it a third time.
- Spoiler: show
- Spoiler: show
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42772
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
I love the fact that joe is amazed with this movie.
We are going to bond with this movie so much.
We are going to bond with this movie so much.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
The themes, the tone, the pacing, the performances, the total care that was put into this movie just makes me want to jump around. It just feels so of our time but also out of time. I don't want to use a tired cliche but there is a sense of that old "they just don't make 'em like this anymore" to Blade Runner 2049.
Really, the only thing that really bugged me about the movie was
Really, the only thing that really bugged me about the movie was
- Spoiler: show
- ABNorman
- The Beef
- Posts: 4475
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:16 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
I was wondering why nobody was mentioning this.durdencommatyler wrote: Really, the only thing that really bugged me about the movie was.
- Spoiler: show
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
I think everyone expected Leto to be the worst thing about this going inABNorman wrote:I was wondering why nobody was mentioning this.durdencommatyler wrote: Really, the only thing that really bugged me about the movie was.
- Spoiler: show
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
I didn't mind him at all. *shrugs* I thought his attitude fit the whole billionaire-that-thinks-he-can-do-it-better-than-the-original.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- Anders
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 23452
- Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
- Location: Oslo, Norway
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
I usually like him, but agree that his was the worst performance. Ana De Armas was amazing.
Last edited by Anders on Wed October 25, 2017 5:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42772
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Yeah, its so carefully crafted that i was totally immerse in this great universe.durdencommatyler wrote:The themes, the tone, the pacing, the performances, the total care that was put into this movie just makes me want to jump around. It just feels so of our time but also out of time. I don't want to use a tired cliche but there is a sense of that old "they just don't make 'em like this anymore" to Blade Runner 2049.
Really, the only thing that really bugged me about the movie was.
- Spoiler: show
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Totally agree on all points.Anders wrote:I usually like him, bit agree that his was the worst performance. Ana De Armas was amazing.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
It's probably a minor critique. He's not awful. He's just so flat and when he's surrounded by such excellent performances it really shows how out of his depth he is in this. Certainly not a deal breaker. The movie is still amazing. I just wanted more from him. I think that part could have been better.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I didn't mind him at all. *shrugs* I thought his attitude fit the whole billionaire-that-thinks-he-can-do-it-better-than-the-original.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
I know LV is waiting to see this in 4k Ultra HD, but I really wish he would see it on the big screen.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 8:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
If you've got the right setup, sure.tragabigzanda wrote:Wait, are TVs better than the movie projectors now?E.H. Ruddock wrote:I know LV is waiting to see this in 4k Ultra HD, but I really wish he would see it on the big screen.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 8:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
I'm pretty sure, after thinking about it, that it was Avatar. Which is a way worse movie than either Blade Runner 2049 or La La Land.tragabigzanda wrote:It was probably La La Land.durdencommatyler wrote:I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42772
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
i saw it on IMAX. Its the only proper way to see this piece of art.durdencommatyler wrote:I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.