Fantasy Football Discussion

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
gardenparty
AnalLog
Posts: 1629
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 11:52 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by gardenparty »

yes, lets see it
gardenparty
AnalLog
Posts: 1629
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 11:52 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by gardenparty »

I have this strange feeling Belichek is going to get Gillislee a few TD's this week. Now that all the attention is on Lewis.

Am I crazy to think that?
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85158
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

Trying to predict Billy B is crazy, yes. But what you're saying isn't crazy.
gardenparty
AnalLog
Posts: 1629
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 11:52 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by gardenparty »

durdencommatyler wrote:Trying to predict Billy B is crazy, yes. But what you're saying isn't crazy.
yeah. I'm rolling him out this week. Sure i'll regret it but whatevs
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85158
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

gardenparty wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Trying to predict Billy B is crazy, yes. But what you're saying isn't crazy.
yeah. I'm rolling him out this week. Sure i'll regret it but whatevs
At some point Gilly has to have a big week. He just has to. I firmly believe it's coming. I don't know if it's this week. But you're not nuts for rolling the dice on it. Soon it'll hit and payoff.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by numbers »

I have a rule of thumb to never touch a Pats RB, a guy can have a 200yd game and not see the field again for a month.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by numbers »

Watson over Dalton this week, right? To me Watson is a must play now, but my app keeps projecting Dalton to score twice as much every week.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85158
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

numbers wrote:Watson over Dalton this week, right? To me Watson is a must play now, but my app keeps projecting Dalton to score twice as much every week.
Stay in those flames, man. Totally go with Watson.

I have to roll Dalton because he's my only option. But if I had Watson, I'd pull that trigger without hesitation.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85158
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

My secondary league is... awful. It's effed. So I traded Gronk (my only real asset) for Alex Smith and Delanie Walker. I feel like that's fair.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by numbers »

durdencommatyler wrote:
numbers wrote:Watson over Dalton this week, right? To me Watson is a must play now, but my app keeps projecting Dalton to score twice as much every week.
Stay in those flames, man. Totally go with Watson.

I have to roll Dalton because he's my only option. But if I had Watson, I'd pull that trigger without hesitation.
So far I've threaded the needle on the Watson/Dalton question really well, the one week I played Dalton he scored 38(although Watson had like 42 that week) and obviously Watson has been good all the weeks I've played him.
gardenparty
AnalLog
Posts: 1629
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 11:52 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by gardenparty »

I would be all in on Watson at this point of the season
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22296
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by bodysnatcher »

not sure what to do this week with my WRs and RBs.

RB
C. Hyde (SF)
I. Crowell (CLE)
W. Smallwood (PHI)

WR
D. Hopkins (HOU)
B. Cooks (NE)
M. Evans (TB)
S. Diggs (MINN)

I'll be starting Hyde and Crowell at RB, and for certain Evans and Cooks at WR. It boils down to Flex.... I'm not sold on Hopkins @ Seattle this week. I'm also not certain about Diggs coming off injury and without Bradford? I'm leaning towards using Smallwood at Flex against San Fran.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85158
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

I'd either go Smallwood or Diggs in FLEX. I'd lean Diggs in a PPR. But I also haven't looked at their respective numbers.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by numbers »

bodysnatcher wrote:not sure what to do this week with my WRs and RBs.

RB
C. Hyde (SF)
I. Crowell (CLE)
W. Smallwood (PHI)

WR
D. Hopkins (HOU)
B. Cooks (NE)
M. Evans (TB)
S. Diggs (MINN)

I'll be starting Hyde and Crowell at RB, and for certain Evans and Cooks at WR. It boils down to Flex.... I'm not sold on Hopkins @ Seattle this week. I'm also not certain about Diggs coming off injury and without Bradford? I'm leaning towards using Smallwood at Flex against San Fran.
I'd go with Hopkins
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85158
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

numbers wrote:
bodysnatcher wrote:not sure what to do this week with my WRs and RBs.

RB
C. Hyde (SF)
I. Crowell (CLE)
W. Smallwood (PHI)

WR
D. Hopkins (HOU)
B. Cooks (NE)
M. Evans (TB)
S. Diggs (MINN)

I'll be starting Hyde and Crowell at RB, and for certain Evans and Cooks at WR. It boils down to Flex.... I'm not sold on Hopkins @ Seattle this week. I'm also not certain about Diggs coming off injury and without Bradford? I'm leaning towards using Smallwood at Flex against San Fran.
I'd go with Hopkins
Oh. Shit. Yeah. I misread this. Definitely go with Hopkins. Especially in a PPR.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22296
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by bodysnatcher »

even against Seattle in Seattle?
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by numbers »

Yeah, I mean it's not a good matchup for him, but he's still Hopkins.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22296
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by bodysnatcher »

:thumbsup:

I'll go with Hopkins, and i think i'm gonna bench Crowell and start Smallwood instead. I feel good about him this week.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85158
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

bodysnatcher wrote::thumbsup:

I'll go with Hopkins, and i think i'm gonna bench Crowell and start Smallwood instead. I feel good about him this week.
I like this.
gardenparty
AnalLog
Posts: 1629
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 11:52 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by gardenparty »

was going to inquire about your Crowell start. i will be benching him this week. Tough matchup.

Hes a difficult one because while he and his team stink he does get a lot of touches.

I'd go Smallwood here.

Also, I like Diggs a lot but ya gotta roll with Hopkins.

Nice WRs there :thumbsup:
Post Reply