Fantasy Football Discussion
-
gardenparty
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 11:52 pm
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
yes, lets see it
-
gardenparty
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 11:52 pm
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
I have this strange feeling Belichek is going to get Gillislee a few TD's this week. Now that all the attention is on Lewis.
Am I crazy to think that?
Am I crazy to think that?
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85158
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
Trying to predict Billy B is crazy, yes. But what you're saying isn't crazy.
-
gardenparty
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 11:52 pm
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
yeah. I'm rolling him out this week. Sure i'll regret it but whatevsdurdencommatyler wrote:Trying to predict Billy B is crazy, yes. But what you're saying isn't crazy.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85158
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
At some point Gilly has to have a big week. He just has to. I firmly believe it's coming. I don't know if it's this week. But you're not nuts for rolling the dice on it. Soon it'll hit and payoff.gardenparty wrote:yeah. I'm rolling him out this week. Sure i'll regret it but whatevsdurdencommatyler wrote:Trying to predict Billy B is crazy, yes. But what you're saying isn't crazy.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
I have a rule of thumb to never touch a Pats RB, a guy can have a 200yd game and not see the field again for a month.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
Watson over Dalton this week, right? To me Watson is a must play now, but my app keeps projecting Dalton to score twice as much every week.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85158
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
Stay in those flames, man. Totally go with Watson.numbers wrote:Watson over Dalton this week, right? To me Watson is a must play now, but my app keeps projecting Dalton to score twice as much every week.
I have to roll Dalton because he's my only option. But if I had Watson, I'd pull that trigger without hesitation.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85158
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
My secondary league is... awful. It's effed. So I traded Gronk (my only real asset) for Alex Smith and Delanie Walker. I feel like that's fair.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
So far I've threaded the needle on the Watson/Dalton question really well, the one week I played Dalton he scored 38(although Watson had like 42 that week) and obviously Watson has been good all the weeks I've played him.durdencommatyler wrote:Stay in those flames, man. Totally go with Watson.numbers wrote:Watson over Dalton this week, right? To me Watson is a must play now, but my app keeps projecting Dalton to score twice as much every week.
I have to roll Dalton because he's my only option. But if I had Watson, I'd pull that trigger without hesitation.
-
gardenparty
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 11:52 pm
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
I would be all in on Watson at this point of the season
- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22296
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
not sure what to do this week with my WRs and RBs.
RB
C. Hyde (SF)
I. Crowell (CLE)
W. Smallwood (PHI)
WR
D. Hopkins (HOU)
B. Cooks (NE)
M. Evans (TB)
S. Diggs (MINN)
I'll be starting Hyde and Crowell at RB, and for certain Evans and Cooks at WR. It boils down to Flex.... I'm not sold on Hopkins @ Seattle this week. I'm also not certain about Diggs coming off injury and without Bradford? I'm leaning towards using Smallwood at Flex against San Fran.
RB
C. Hyde (SF)
I. Crowell (CLE)
W. Smallwood (PHI)
WR
D. Hopkins (HOU)
B. Cooks (NE)
M. Evans (TB)
S. Diggs (MINN)
I'll be starting Hyde and Crowell at RB, and for certain Evans and Cooks at WR. It boils down to Flex.... I'm not sold on Hopkins @ Seattle this week. I'm also not certain about Diggs coming off injury and without Bradford? I'm leaning towards using Smallwood at Flex against San Fran.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85158
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
I'd either go Smallwood or Diggs in FLEX. I'd lean Diggs in a PPR. But I also haven't looked at their respective numbers.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
I'd go with Hopkinsbodysnatcher wrote:not sure what to do this week with my WRs and RBs.
RB
C. Hyde (SF)
I. Crowell (CLE)
W. Smallwood (PHI)
WR
D. Hopkins (HOU)
B. Cooks (NE)
M. Evans (TB)
S. Diggs (MINN)
I'll be starting Hyde and Crowell at RB, and for certain Evans and Cooks at WR. It boils down to Flex.... I'm not sold on Hopkins @ Seattle this week. I'm also not certain about Diggs coming off injury and without Bradford? I'm leaning towards using Smallwood at Flex against San Fran.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85158
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
Oh. Shit. Yeah. I misread this. Definitely go with Hopkins. Especially in a PPR.numbers wrote:I'd go with Hopkinsbodysnatcher wrote:not sure what to do this week with my WRs and RBs.
RB
C. Hyde (SF)
I. Crowell (CLE)
W. Smallwood (PHI)
WR
D. Hopkins (HOU)
B. Cooks (NE)
M. Evans (TB)
S. Diggs (MINN)
I'll be starting Hyde and Crowell at RB, and for certain Evans and Cooks at WR. It boils down to Flex.... I'm not sold on Hopkins @ Seattle this week. I'm also not certain about Diggs coming off injury and without Bradford? I'm leaning towards using Smallwood at Flex against San Fran.
- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22296
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
even against Seattle in Seattle?
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
Yeah, I mean it's not a good matchup for him, but he's still Hopkins.
- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22296
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
I'll go with Hopkins, and i think i'm gonna bench Crowell and start Smallwood instead. I feel good about him this week.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85158
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
I like this.bodysnatcher wrote:![]()
I'll go with Hopkins, and i think i'm gonna bench Crowell and start Smallwood instead. I feel good about him this week.
-
gardenparty
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 11:52 pm
Re: Fantasy Football Discussion
was going to inquire about your Crowell start. i will be benching him this week. Tough matchup.
Hes a difficult one because while he and his team stink he does get a lot of touches.
I'd go Smallwood here.
Also, I like Diggs a lot but ya gotta roll with Hopkins.
Nice WRs there
Hes a difficult one because while he and his team stink he does get a lot of touches.
I'd go Smallwood here.
Also, I like Diggs a lot but ya gotta roll with Hopkins.
Nice WRs there