TV: Stranger Things

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84851
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by epilogue »

Mecca wrote:
theplatypus wrote:It (2017) just made this show obsolete by pulling off the tone and setting way better so I have no interest in watching season 2 of this
i've never agreed with a jorge post as much as this one, but i still watched and enjoyed season 2
I haven't seen "It" so I can't really agree or disagree. But just based on the trailers I've seen, it seems to me that the tones of these projects are completely different. Also, the setting is the same? Did the update "It" so that it takes place in the 80s? That's unfortunate.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

The tone is very similar, and, yes, It takes place in the '80s. Which makes perfect sense. Contemporary audiences aren't going to feel nostalgic for the '50s in the way the original audience for the book would have, and this way the second movie can be set in present time.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by VinylGuy »

It was a wise choice to make it in the 80s. It didnt hurt the material.

Still, im not sure why you guys are comparing the tone of It with ST. Two different things, both of them cool in my book.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Has anyone else that watches this show read Dean Koontz's "Door to December"?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84851
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:The tone is very similar, and, yes, It takes place in the '80s. Which makes perfect sense. Contemporary audiences aren't going to feel nostalgic for the '50s in the way the original audience for the book would have, and this way the second movie can be set in present time.
Interesting that you like nostalgia in 'It' but not in Stranger Things.

For me it isn't the nostalgia that's important. The larger themes of America in the 50's is far more potent. What King was doing in the book had little to do with nostalgia and everything to do with the myth and menace of 50's Americana. Losing that kinda sucks. At least in my mind. Again, I haven't seen the film.

But the same holds true for the adult stuff in part two. There are so many great parallels to the whole "child abduction" boom/obsession/fear in the 80s that played so well in contrast with the 50's stuff in the book. Maybe they're using that as the starting point in the movie (the 80's stuff) but I have a hard time imagining what modern day equivalent will be. Anyway... my opinion on the matter is fairly meaningless until I actually watch the damn thing.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 8:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84851
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by epilogue »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Has anyone else that watches this show read Dean Koontz's "Door to December"?
I read Odd Thomas. Is Door to December one of the Odd Thomas books?
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 8:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Has anyone else that watches this show read Dean Koontz's "Door to December"?
I read Odd Thomas. Is Door to December one of the Odd Thomas books?
No. Door to December is about a scientist-type that kidnaps and raises a little girl, basically in a sensory-deprivation tank, and she learns to use her mind in inter-dimensional ways, eventually using those powers to turn on the men who did this to her.

Pair that with Super 8, where you have a bunch of kids in the late 70's riding around town on their bikes, discovering a monster that was being hidden by the government but then escapes, ultimately kidnapping people in the town and causing power surges.

Stranger Things.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84851
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by epilogue »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Has anyone else that watches this show read Dean Koontz's "Door to December"?
I read Odd Thomas. Is Door to December one of the Odd Thomas books?
No. Door to December is about a scientist-type that kidnaps and raises a little girl, basically in a sensory-deprivation tank, and she learns to use her mind in inter-dimensional ways, eventually using those powers to turn on the men who did this to her.

Pair that with Super 8, where you have a bunch of kids in the late 70's riding around town on their bikes, discovering a monster that was being hidden by the government but then escapes, ultimately kidnapping people in the town and causing power surges.

Stranger Things.
:thumbsup: :thumbsup:
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 8:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36491
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by Jorge »

Argo didn't like it
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

For the record, I never said I "liked" the nostalgia in It.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 8:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36491
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by Jorge »

I think he said "there was nothing good about it", which has become Argo's favorite thing to say about movies he doesn't like
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84851
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:For the record, I never said I "liked" the nostalgia in It.
Fair enough. I inferred from your post that you were fine with the nostalgia in the 'It' film but you seem to be enraged by it on Stranger Things. But, you're right. You never said that.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84851
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by epilogue »

Do we have an 'It' thread? Searching for it is impossible and I can't seem to find it on a brief, lazy look.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:For the record, I never said I "liked" the nostalgia in It.
Fair enough. I inferred from your post that you were fine with the nostalgia in the 'It' film but you seem to be enraged by it on Stranger Things. But, you're right. You never said that.
The difference is that It doesn't bank on nostalgia the way ST does. It's not chocked full of eye-roll-y references. I think it changes the backdrop for reasons of relatability and topicality; the sociopolitical menace of '50s Americana isn't exactly a super potent/relevant theme for a mainstream audience right now.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84851
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:For the record, I never said I "liked" the nostalgia in It.
Fair enough. I inferred from your post that you were fine with the nostalgia in the 'It' film but you seem to be enraged by it on Stranger Things. But, you're right. You never said that.
The difference is that It doesn't bank on nostalgia the way ST does. It's not chocked full of eye-roll-y references. I think it changes the backdrop for reasons of relatability and topicality; the sociopolitical menace of '50s Americana isn't exactly a super potent/relevant theme for a mainstream audience right now.
Fair enough. I'm probably being too precious about it since it was damn near the only thing I really appreciated about the book. And I thought they handled it well in the old mini-series (flawed as that was).
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84851
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: TV: Stranger Things

Post by epilogue »

Just like S1, this thing got better as it went along. And just like S1, the penultimate episode was far better than the finale. Guys, really this thing was exactly like S1 but with WAY more CGI. They made it bigger and more gross. Much more phantasmagoria (which I really loved). They seemed to play down the nostalgia factor, too.

I could actually see someone liking S2 more than S1, actually. But to me they were consistent with each other. The final little coda on the finale was fantastic.

This show is best when it lets the character's lose. Millie Bobby Brown for Queen of Everything!
Post Reply