Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Books, movies, television...
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 8:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33834
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

A little late.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84848
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by epilogue »

tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:The tone is very similar, and, yes, It takes place in the '80s. Which makes perfect sense. Contemporary audiences aren't going to feel nostalgic for the '50s in the way the original audience for the book would have, and this way the second movie can be set in present time.
Interesting that you like nostalgia in 'It' but not in Stranger Things.

For me it isn't the nostalgia that's important. The larger themes of America in the 50's is far more potent. What King was doing in the book had little to do with nostalgia and everything to do with the myth and menace of 50's Americana. Losing that kinda sucks. At least in my mind. Again, I haven't seen the film.

But the same holds true for the adult stuff in part two. There are so many great parallels to the whole "child abduction" boom/obsession/fear in the 80s that played so well in contrast with the 50's stuff in the book. Maybe they're using that as the starting point in the movie (the 80's stuff) but I have a hard time imagining what modern day equivalent will be. Anyway... my opinion on the matter is fairly meaningless until I actually watch the damn thing.
Another vote for "placing the movie in the 80s works." Really well, in fact.
Cool. So without spoiling anything major about the movie (I saw the old mini-series and read the book, so you can be loose with the term "Spoiler" as I know the story), as a fan of the book and the film, can you speak more to why the 80's move worked for you? Did you miss any of the subtext and commentary from the book by changing the decade? How do they replace all that tension, texture and thematic exploration of the 1950's and perceived Americana in the movie? What themes/ideas/menaces take the place of all that stuff?
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33834
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

I think it could be argued that the '80s represent a certain kind of hollow Americana to modern generations that the '50s did to older generations.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84848
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:I think it could be argued that the '80s represent a certain kind of hollow Americana to modern generations that the '50s did to older generations.
But in an opposite way, right? I mean, as it pertains to themes of 'It.' So much of the point of 'It' is that there couldn't possibly be this inexplicable horror lurking beneath all of it. In the 80's weren't there boogey-men everywhere? At least, that's my memory of the 80's. Especially with the rise of child abduction attention: America's Most Wanted, etc.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 8:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84848
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by epilogue »

Cool. So, it sounds to me like the stuff I connected with the most in the kids' half of the book is different in the movie and I just need to accept that and enjoy the movie for what it's trying to do. Thanks.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 8:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

tragabigzanda wrote:This would be good.
http://collider.com/it-2-cast-jessica-c ... rly-marsh/
oh man, LV will HATE that.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42768
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by VinylGuy »

Its a safe choice but it makes sense.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by Jorge »

I don't like it
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33834
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

That was pretty much a foregone conclusion. The kid actor said she wanted her, and the director has worked with her before on Mama. It seems super obvious. It's awful, but obvious.
User avatar
Farmer John
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6459
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by Farmer John »

Team Amy Adams
User avatar
Farmer John
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6459
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by Farmer John »

I've seen IT three times now. I love it so much.
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by Mecca »

does chastain even have freckles?
User avatar
daft twat
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5355
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:23 am
Location: The In Between

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by daft twat »

Tim Curry was better.
User avatar
Biff Pocoroba
TIER 1 Essential Critical Infrastructure Worker
Posts: 4801
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:08 pm
Location: 5th floor, Bay 7, position 5740

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by Biff Pocoroba »

I enjoyed the new It.
Two things though: 1. the kids' part was better and the scarier half of the book and original mini. 2. I hope they change the big finale fight to something other than a giant spider.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42768
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by VinylGuy »

fuck no, i want the spider and the whole cosmic trip.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by Strat »

I can't wait. What a great teaser. Unique.

User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33834
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Movie: It (Stephen King, 2017)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

Looks so good. I’m pumped.
Post Reply