Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by bune »

Rangi Guy wrote:Was the orgy joke really any worse than.....

Thor: I spun the hammer really fast and it would pull me off -
Korg: Oh my God! The hammer pulled you off?
I think that one may have flew by a few people. I was cracking up at it but no one else was.

I mean, I'm laughing right now thinking of the delivery of that line. so good.
wease wrote:The rock-paper-scissors bits were really good.

Also, remember the leaked Avengers 3 footage from SDCC that had the Guardians finding Thor? I just looked again and
Spoiler: show
Thor has two eyes.
On a podcast they mentioned this and said it was probably to keep it from being spoiled in Thor. I mean, if the San Diego people would have reported Thor only having one eye, it would have kind of given away part of this movie, yeah?
BurtReynolds wrote:
Rangi Guy wrote:
wease wrote:The rock-paper-scissors bits were really good.

Also, remember the leaked Avengers 3 footage from SDCC that had the Guardians finding Thor? I just looked again and
Spoiler: show
Thor has two eyes.
The trailer for Thor also
Spoiler: show
didn't show any damage to his eye when he landed on the rainbow bridge thingie and had lightning sparking out of every orifice
yeah I noticed that one.
Spoiler: show
The missing eye effect looked weird .
There were a couple spots where you could still see his eye and I kept thinking, "They spent millions on this movie and someone missed the fact you can see his eye through the makeup?"
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by @SkitchP »

I enjoyed this for the most part but definitely felt like way too many things going on and not enough time spent with any of them.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
doone
Future Drummer
Posts: 3404
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:17 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: right there

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by doone »

I haven't seen it yet so I skipped the last couple of pages of discussion but I have a question...

Does this benefit from 3D or can I get away with regular D?

(3D makes me dizzy sometimes).
bada wrote:Cause the two girls on the board voted for the rapey song.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by Jorge »

Skip the 3D
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47966
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

this was a mess, but goldblum was fun
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
i got bugs
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4231
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:07 pm

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by i got bugs »

Spoiler: show
so the post credits ship.. guardians, right?? Or thanos??
User avatar
doone
Future Drummer
Posts: 3404
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:17 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: right there

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by doone »

theplatypus wrote:Skip the 3D
Thanks for the answer.
Does anyone who liked the movie agree? 3D not necessary?
bada wrote:Cause the two girls on the board voted for the rapey song.
User avatar
Stickman
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10264
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by Stickman »

i got bugs wrote:
Spoiler: show
so the post credits ship.. guardians, right?? Or thanos??
Spoiler: show
Thanos.
"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
User avatar
i got bugs
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4231
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:07 pm

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by i got bugs »

Stickman wrote:
i got bugs wrote:
Spoiler: show
so the post credits ship.. guardians, right?? Or thanos??
Spoiler: show
Thanos.
Spoiler: show
oh wait.. the leaked trailer.. you're right, it's sanctuary
Revelator
AnalLog
Posts: 1931
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 8:29 pm

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by Revelator »

I thoroughly enjoyed this and can't remember a time when I laughed this much at a comic book movie or action movie in general. Mark Ruffalo's scenes were ace.
MitchCumstein
A Return To Form
Posts: 182
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:51 am
Location: 5280'

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by MitchCumstein »

doone wrote:
theplatypus wrote:Skip the 3D
Thanks for the answer.
Does anyone who liked the movie agree? 3D not necessary?
I saw it IMAX 3D. It wasn't distracting at all, but nothing I can think of that was necessary.
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by Mecca »

MitchCumstein wrote:
doone wrote:
theplatypus wrote:Skip the 3D
Thanks for the answer.
Does anyone who liked the movie agree? 3D not necessary?
I saw it IMAX 3D. It wasn't distracting at all, but nothing I can think of that was necessary.
3D is never necessary.

except maybe a couple of scenes in Jackass 3D
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by stip »

saw this a second time with the wife.

I think I liked it equally the first and second time. The first time everything was unexpected. The second time I could appreciate it without prior expectations. Very solid movie but didn't crack my top 3 (or possibly even top 5) like I had hoped. My wife loved it but wished it was a bit more serious with Hela (tonally she likes where the Captain America movies are best, or anything with Robert Downey Junior)

With minimal prior knowledge of the movies she thought Justice League looked too dreary and is super excited for Black Panther.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by @SkitchP »

You know, funny you should say that about Black Panther. I was minimally interested based on the trailers, but that one was one that actually really benefited from the big screen. More immersive than maybe i was able to get off a laptop screen.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Rangi Guy
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9429
Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by Rangi Guy »

No interest in Black Panther. The trailers look like crap
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by B »

Mecca wrote:
MitchCumstein wrote:
doone wrote:
theplatypus wrote:Skip the 3D
Thanks for the answer.
Does anyone who liked the movie agree? 3D not necessary?
I saw it IMAX 3D. It wasn't distracting at all, but nothing I can think of that was necessary.
3D is never necessary.

except maybe a couple of scenes in Jackass 3D
Piranha.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

is there 3D pron?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
doone
Future Drummer
Posts: 3404
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:17 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: right there

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by doone »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:is there 3D pron?
Yeah, it's called real life.
bada wrote:Cause the two girls on the board voted for the rapey song.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

doone wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:is there 3D pron?
Yeah, it's called real life.
thanks for explaining the joke, chud
Spoiler: show
;)
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!

Post by VinylGuy »

Ok i was surprised on how much i enjoyed it. It was fun.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
Post Reply