College Football

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply

Who will win the national championship?

Clemson
6
40%
LSU
9
60%
 
Total votes: 15

User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: College Football

Post by verb_to_trust »

Saying college football is stagnant while brontosaurus QBs like Brett Hundley roam the NFL landscape weekly is pretty funny.
Dick/Balls
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52025
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: College Football

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

AL
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: College Football

Post by spike »

verb_to_trust wrote:Saying college football is stagnant while brontosaurus QBs like Brett Hundley roam the NFL landscape weekly is pretty funny.
My interest is waning in the pro product as well. And before you assume, this was the case prior to Rodgers' boo boo.
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: College Football

Post by Monkey_Driven »

spike wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
spike wrote:Fun and interesting few weeks of football, same boring and predictable result. An expanded playoff field really would inject some life into this stagnant sport.
Yeah, it would be much easier to determine the 8th and 9th best team in the country...
Not the point. It's simple math; expansion would allow the possibility of a more diverse group of teams into the college postseason every year simply by having more spots available.
It would be roughly the same dozen or so teams every year in that format too.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: College Football

Post by spike »

Monkey_Driven wrote:
spike wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
spike wrote:Fun and interesting few weeks of football, same boring and predictable result. An expanded playoff field really would inject some life into this stagnant sport.
Yeah, it would be much easier to determine the 8th and 9th best team in the country...
Not the point. It's simple math; expansion would allow the possibility of a more diverse group of teams into the college postseason every year simply by having more spots available.
It would be roughly the same dozen or so teams every year in that format too.
Okay, let's assume that's actually a valid statement, a playoff system would still increase potential for a more diverse final four or two every year.
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: College Football

Post by Monkey_Driven »

spike wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
spike wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
spike wrote:Fun and interesting few weeks of football, same boring and predictable result. An expanded playoff field really would inject some life into this stagnant sport.
Yeah, it would be much easier to determine the 8th and 9th best team in the country...
Not the point. It's simple math; expansion would allow the possibility of a more diverse group of teams into the college postseason every year simply by having more spots available.
It would be roughly the same dozen or so teams every year in that format too.
Okay, let's assume that's actually a valid statement, a playoff system would still increase potential for a more diverse final four or two every year.
Maybe, it could also lead to a lot of the same teams blowing out the lower seeds. There's never going to be a perfect system with 110+ FBS teams to determine a champ without playing an extended playoff that would cheapen the regular season. Let's give this format a few more years to see what new teams come into the fold. In four years there have been 8 different teams in this thing.

Just look at the past 20 years of college ball. I would expect another 4-6 new teams cycling into the four team playoff in the next five years due to the cyclical nature of the sport.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: College Football

Post by Green Habit »

Monkey_Driven wrote:I would expect another 4-6 new teams cycling into the four team playoff in the next five years due to the cyclical nature of the sport.
CFB is one of the least cyclical North American sports, though. Teams like Bama, USC, Michigan, tOSU, ND, Texas, OU, etc. will always be good in the long run even if they have road bumps in the short run.
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: College Football

Post by Monkey_Driven »

Green Habit wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:I would expect another 4-6 new teams cycling into the four team playoff in the next five years due to the cyclical nature of the sport.
CFB is one of the least cyclical North American sports, though. Teams like Bama, USC, Michigan, tOSU, ND, Texas, OU, etc. will always be good in the long run even if they have road bumps in the short run.
Of course. Those teams in down periods will eventually cycle in along with a random team or two.
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: College Football

Post by Electromatic »

College Football is about Recruiting, Money and Coaching at the FBS level. It’s mostly about money generation and who gets the money.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: College Football

Post by Green Habit »

Food for thought: if we were still in the BCS era everyone would be having vicious arguments right now regarding Oklahoma ranked over Georgia. UGA clearly had the much better loss between the two. Instead it's a big nothingburger.
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: College Football

Post by Monkey_Driven »

Electromatic wrote:College Football is about Recruiting, Money and Coaching at the FBS level. It’s mostly about money generation and who gets the money.
Yup. And it is not a sport where a generational star can lead a mid tier team to a championship.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: College Football

Post by spike »

Monkey_Driven wrote:
spike wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
spike wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
spike wrote:Fun and interesting few weeks of football, same boring and predictable result. An expanded playoff field really would inject some life into this stagnant sport.
Yeah, it would be much easier to determine the 8th and 9th best team in the country...
Not the point. It's simple math; expansion would allow the possibility of a more diverse group of teams into the college postseason every year simply by having more spots available.
It would be roughly the same dozen or so teams every year in that format too.
Okay, let's assume that's actually a valid statement, a playoff system would still increase potential for a more diverse final four or two every year.
Maybe, it could also lead to a lot of the same teams blowing out the lower seeds. There's never going to be a perfect system with 110+ FBS teams to determine a champ without playing an extended playoff that would cheapen the regular season. Let's give this format a few more years to see what new teams come into the fold. In four years there have been 8 different teams in this thing.

Just look at the past 20 years of college ball. I would expect another 4-6 new teams cycling into the four team playoff in the next five years due to the cyclical nature of the sport.
Sounds good.
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: College Football

Post by Monkey_Driven »

spike wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
spike wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
spike wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
spike wrote:Fun and interesting few weeks of football, same boring and predictable result. An expanded playoff field really would inject some life into this stagnant sport.
Yeah, it would be much easier to determine the 8th and 9th best team in the country...
Not the point. It's simple math; expansion would allow the possibility of a more diverse group of teams into the college postseason every year simply by having more spots available.
It would be roughly the same dozen or so teams every year in that format too.
Okay, let's assume that's actually a valid statement, a playoff system would still increase potential for a more diverse final four or two every year.
Maybe, it could also lead to a lot of the same teams blowing out the lower seeds. There's never going to be a perfect system with 110+ FBS teams to determine a champ without playing an extended playoff that would cheapen the regular season. Let's give this format a few more years to see what new teams come into the fold. In four years there have been 8 different teams in this thing.

Just look at the past 20 years of college ball. I would expect another 4-6 new teams cycling into the four team playoff in the next five years due to the cyclical nature of the sport.
Sounds good.
:thumbsup:
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22816
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: College Football

Post by Bammer »

I'm just glad I can still vote for UW in this poll. Go Dawgs!
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
darth_vedder
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6467
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm

Re: College Football

Post by darth_vedder »

I'm looking forward to Clemson vs. Alabama 3. I know it's maybe not as exciting for people who aren't fans of either team, or casual fans in general, but I think it's a great matchup. This is pretty much the only time they get to play each other. Playing Bama is a pretty good indicator of where your team is; it's gonna be great.

Fun fact, last time Dabo was in the Sugar Bowl, he was as a player at Alabama. Hopefully this time he'll win as a coach.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 48511
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: College Football

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

darth_vedder wrote:I'm looking forward to Clemson vs. Alabama 3. I know it's maybe not as exciting for people who aren't fans of either team, or casual fans in general, but I think it's a great matchup. This is pretty much the only time they get to play each other. Playing Bama is a pretty good indicator of where your team is; it's gonna be great.

Fun fact, last time Dabo was in the Sugar Bowl, he was as a player at Alabama. Hopefully this time he'll win as a coach.
he will
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: College Football

Post by Monkey_Driven »

I'm excited to see both semifinal games. Good matchups. Glad they are on New Year's day this year.
User avatar
darth_vedder
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6467
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm

Re: College Football

Post by darth_vedder »

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
darth_vedder wrote:I'm looking forward to Clemson vs. Alabama 3. I know it's maybe not as exciting for people who aren't fans of either team, or casual fans in general, but I think it's a great matchup. This is pretty much the only time they get to play each other. Playing Bama is a pretty good indicator of where your team is; it's gonna be great.

Fun fact, last time Dabo was in the Sugar Bowl, he was as a player at Alabama. Hopefully this time he'll win as a coach.
he will
Let's hope so.:) It's been an interesting new rivalry between two schools with a lot of ties but not much on the field playing.

To me, Bama looks very similar to last year (not a knock, they made it the the championship), but Clemson is different. They still do a lot of the same stuff, but they have more of a 4 headed running system. I'm hoping Etienne can bust one or two loose. He's just a freshman with loads of potential.

User avatar
Biff Pocoroba
TIER 1 Essential Critical Infrastructure Worker
Posts: 4801
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:08 pm
Location: 5th floor, Bay 7, position 5740

Re: College Football

Post by Biff Pocoroba »

No one has commented about signing day?
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: College Football

Post by Electromatic »

Biff Pocoroba wrote:No one has commented about signing day?

Georgia had a good evening.
Post Reply