College Football
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: College Football
Saying college football is stagnant while brontosaurus QBs like Brett Hundley roam the NFL landscape weekly is pretty funny.
Dick/Balls
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52025
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35960
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: College Football
My interest is waning in the pro product as well. And before you assume, this was the case prior to Rodgers' boo boo.verb_to_trust wrote:Saying college football is stagnant while brontosaurus QBs like Brett Hundley roam the NFL landscape weekly is pretty funny.
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28128
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: College Football
It would be roughly the same dozen or so teams every year in that format too.spike wrote:Not the point. It's simple math; expansion would allow the possibility of a more diverse group of teams into the college postseason every year simply by having more spots available.Monkey_Driven wrote:Yeah, it would be much easier to determine the 8th and 9th best team in the country...spike wrote:Fun and interesting few weeks of football, same boring and predictable result. An expanded playoff field really would inject some life into this stagnant sport.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35960
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: College Football
Okay, let's assume that's actually a valid statement, a playoff system would still increase potential for a more diverse final four or two every year.Monkey_Driven wrote:It would be roughly the same dozen or so teams every year in that format too.spike wrote:Not the point. It's simple math; expansion would allow the possibility of a more diverse group of teams into the college postseason every year simply by having more spots available.Monkey_Driven wrote:Yeah, it would be much easier to determine the 8th and 9th best team in the country...spike wrote:Fun and interesting few weeks of football, same boring and predictable result. An expanded playoff field really would inject some life into this stagnant sport.
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28128
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: College Football
Maybe, it could also lead to a lot of the same teams blowing out the lower seeds. There's never going to be a perfect system with 110+ FBS teams to determine a champ without playing an extended playoff that would cheapen the regular season. Let's give this format a few more years to see what new teams come into the fold. In four years there have been 8 different teams in this thing.spike wrote:Okay, let's assume that's actually a valid statement, a playoff system would still increase potential for a more diverse final four or two every year.Monkey_Driven wrote:It would be roughly the same dozen or so teams every year in that format too.spike wrote:Not the point. It's simple math; expansion would allow the possibility of a more diverse group of teams into the college postseason every year simply by having more spots available.Monkey_Driven wrote:Yeah, it would be much easier to determine the 8th and 9th best team in the country...spike wrote:Fun and interesting few weeks of football, same boring and predictable result. An expanded playoff field really would inject some life into this stagnant sport.
Just look at the past 20 years of college ball. I would expect another 4-6 new teams cycling into the four team playoff in the next five years due to the cyclical nature of the sport.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: College Football
CFB is one of the least cyclical North American sports, though. Teams like Bama, USC, Michigan, tOSU, ND, Texas, OU, etc. will always be good in the long run even if they have road bumps in the short run.Monkey_Driven wrote:I would expect another 4-6 new teams cycling into the four team playoff in the next five years due to the cyclical nature of the sport.
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28128
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: College Football
Of course. Those teams in down periods will eventually cycle in along with a random team or two.Green Habit wrote:CFB is one of the least cyclical North American sports, though. Teams like Bama, USC, Michigan, tOSU, ND, Texas, OU, etc. will always be good in the long run even if they have road bumps in the short run.Monkey_Driven wrote:I would expect another 4-6 new teams cycling into the four team playoff in the next five years due to the cyclical nature of the sport.
-
Electromatic
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: College Football
College Football is about Recruiting, Money and Coaching at the FBS level. It’s mostly about money generation and who gets the money.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: College Football
Food for thought: if we were still in the BCS era everyone would be having vicious arguments right now regarding Oklahoma ranked over Georgia. UGA clearly had the much better loss between the two. Instead it's a big nothingburger.
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28128
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: College Football
Yup. And it is not a sport where a generational star can lead a mid tier team to a championship.Electromatic wrote:College Football is about Recruiting, Money and Coaching at the FBS level. It’s mostly about money generation and who gets the money.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35960
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: College Football
Sounds good.Monkey_Driven wrote:Maybe, it could also lead to a lot of the same teams blowing out the lower seeds. There's never going to be a perfect system with 110+ FBS teams to determine a champ without playing an extended playoff that would cheapen the regular season. Let's give this format a few more years to see what new teams come into the fold. In four years there have been 8 different teams in this thing.spike wrote:Okay, let's assume that's actually a valid statement, a playoff system would still increase potential for a more diverse final four or two every year.Monkey_Driven wrote:It would be roughly the same dozen or so teams every year in that format too.spike wrote:Not the point. It's simple math; expansion would allow the possibility of a more diverse group of teams into the college postseason every year simply by having more spots available.Monkey_Driven wrote:Yeah, it would be much easier to determine the 8th and 9th best team in the country...spike wrote:Fun and interesting few weeks of football, same boring and predictable result. An expanded playoff field really would inject some life into this stagnant sport.
Just look at the past 20 years of college ball. I would expect another 4-6 new teams cycling into the four team playoff in the next five years due to the cyclical nature of the sport.
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28128
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: College Football
spike wrote:Sounds good.Monkey_Driven wrote:Maybe, it could also lead to a lot of the same teams blowing out the lower seeds. There's never going to be a perfect system with 110+ FBS teams to determine a champ without playing an extended playoff that would cheapen the regular season. Let's give this format a few more years to see what new teams come into the fold. In four years there have been 8 different teams in this thing.spike wrote:Okay, let's assume that's actually a valid statement, a playoff system would still increase potential for a more diverse final four or two every year.Monkey_Driven wrote:It would be roughly the same dozen or so teams every year in that format too.spike wrote:Not the point. It's simple math; expansion would allow the possibility of a more diverse group of teams into the college postseason every year simply by having more spots available.Monkey_Driven wrote:Yeah, it would be much easier to determine the 8th and 9th best team in the country...spike wrote:Fun and interesting few weeks of football, same boring and predictable result. An expanded playoff field really would inject some life into this stagnant sport.
Just look at the past 20 years of college ball. I would expect another 4-6 new teams cycling into the four team playoff in the next five years due to the cyclical nature of the sport.
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22816
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
- darth_vedder
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm
Re: College Football
I'm looking forward to Clemson vs. Alabama 3. I know it's maybe not as exciting for people who aren't fans of either team, or casual fans in general, but I think it's a great matchup. This is pretty much the only time they get to play each other. Playing Bama is a pretty good indicator of where your team is; it's gonna be great.
Fun fact, last time Dabo was in the Sugar Bowl, he was as a player at Alabama. Hopefully this time he'll win as a coach.
Fun fact, last time Dabo was in the Sugar Bowl, he was as a player at Alabama. Hopefully this time he'll win as a coach.
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48511
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: College Football
he willdarth_vedder wrote:I'm looking forward to Clemson vs. Alabama 3. I know it's maybe not as exciting for people who aren't fans of either team, or casual fans in general, but I think it's a great matchup. This is pretty much the only time they get to play each other. Playing Bama is a pretty good indicator of where your team is; it's gonna be great.
Fun fact, last time Dabo was in the Sugar Bowl, he was as a player at Alabama. Hopefully this time he'll win as a coach.
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28128
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: College Football
I'm excited to see both semifinal games. Good matchups. Glad they are on New Year's day this year.
- darth_vedder
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm
Re: College Football
Let's hope so.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:he willdarth_vedder wrote:I'm looking forward to Clemson vs. Alabama 3. I know it's maybe not as exciting for people who aren't fans of either team, or casual fans in general, but I think it's a great matchup. This is pretty much the only time they get to play each other. Playing Bama is a pretty good indicator of where your team is; it's gonna be great.
Fun fact, last time Dabo was in the Sugar Bowl, he was as a player at Alabama. Hopefully this time he'll win as a coach.
To me, Bama looks very similar to last year (not a knock, they made it the the championship), but Clemson is different. They still do a lot of the same stuff, but they have more of a 4 headed running system. I'm hoping Etienne can bust one or two loose. He's just a freshman with loads of potential.
- Biff Pocoroba
- TIER 1 Essential Critical Infrastructure Worker
- Posts: 4801
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:08 pm
- Location: 5th floor, Bay 7, position 5740
Re: College Football
No one has commented about signing day?
-
Electromatic
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: College Football
Biff Pocoroba wrote:No one has commented about signing day?
Georgia had a good evening.