I meant he didn't need to be Tarkin or Mace Windu or Darth Plagueis. That's what I meant by he never needed to be anyone. He never needed to be a previous established or known character. Snoke could just be Snoke. And that's the way it should have been. I'm glad that's the way it was.Anders wrote:I think that is absurd. The leader of the galaxy is no one, with no story, and dies without any fight. Makes the plot paper thin.durdencommatyler wrote:Yup. The Snoke stuff was always absurd. He never needed to be anyone either.stip wrote:the same is true of Snoke. The Emperor had zero backstory in the OT, and didn't need it. Neither did Snoke, as both are supporting characters that represent a wall our main protagonist/antagonist pairings need to bounce off of. Attention paid to that backstory (in this movie) draws focus from our principle characters.durdencommatyler wrote:They did make her nobody, though. It was fan reaction and internet speculation that turned Rey into "someone." We did that. There's nothing in the film that points to her being a descendant of a known character.Anders wrote:If you look at the build up in TFA, and the twist in TLJ, it just doesn't make sense. They could have made her nobody to begin with, and no one would have cared in a negative way, only positive. Obi-Wan was a nobody, Luke was a nobody in the first movie.i got bugs wrote:U guys think kylo lied about reys parents??
There will be some canon exploration later, when you can make it its own thing.
He is someone in the sense that you mean it.