Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
- bune
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9359
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
- Location: Washington State
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
OK, so as an example: the ship and boat at the beginning of the film is the same as the ones at the end of the film, they are just told from different perspectives. It's because there are three timelines.
It's not literally Memento and being told backwards, that's just the most similar movie I could think of.
It's not literally Memento and being told backwards, that's just the most similar movie I could think of.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Ah. There we go. Then we're on the same page.bune wrote:they are just told from different perspectives. It's because there are three timelines.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33835
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
If they’re trying, they’re failing. There are movies that legitimately change how we view montage in cinema (Battleship Potemkin, Breathless), but this is not that. This is just bad filmmaking.dimejinky99 wrote:Are they trying to change the grammar though?LoathedVermin72 wrote:The level of incompetence in the editing and direction of Dunkirk is truly surprising. And concerning. People don’t even seem to understand the basic GRAMMAR of cinema anymore, let alone how human emotion works.
I know what you mean and I see it a lot these days but the only conclusion I came to is well maybe styles are changing and evolving.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Ryan Gosling
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Mecca wrote:Ryan Gosling
This film ruined my Ryan Gosling fantasy. He’s depicted as the one note one line of dialogue is all he is capable of charlatan he’s accused of being.
I like them pretty and stupid. The quieter and the stupider and prettier they are, the better.
But he looks like he needs help even working a tp dispenser in this.
Such a heartbreaking shame.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- Orpheus
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:08 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
I can usually handle LV hot takes but this was a fine film.
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
You do realize that he’s a robot, right?dimejinky99 wrote:Mecca wrote:Ryan Gosling
This film ruined my Ryan Gosling fantasy. He’s depicted as the one note one line of dialogue is all he is capable of charlatan he’s accused of being.
I like them pretty and stupid. The quieter and the stupider and prettier they are, the better.
But he looks like he needs help even working a tp dispenser in this.
Such a heartbreaking shame.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Mecca wrote:You do realize that he’s a robot, right?dimejinky99 wrote:Mecca wrote:Ryan Gosling
This film ruined my Ryan Gosling fantasy. He’s depicted as the one note one line of dialogue is all he is capable of charlatan he’s accused of being.
I like them pretty and stupid. The quieter and the stupider and prettier they are, the better.
But he looks like he needs help even working a tp dispenser in this.
Such a heartbreaking shame.
There’s the other thing. Was he??? This is where the original blade runner lost me too who the fuck is what and why can’t we make it intriguing instead of confusing?!?
And if he is a robot!! Why does he have a fucking coffee machine and why does he even need a TP dispenser to be unable to use one?)
I thought AI in the future coming to usurp us was THE POINT OF THE FILM??
He can barely put a sentence together ffs!!
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
It's Harrison Ford's character that is up in the air as to whether or not he is a robot, dime. Gosling's character is very much a robot, there were tons of scenes referencing it in the movie
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Everyone at work hated him because he was a robot, the baseline tests, the references to his model number...
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33835
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
The future of movies lies in inhumane soulless robot junk like this and Dunkirk and Spider-Man: Homecoming I guess
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
As long as they are still making F&F movies, there's hopeLoathedVermin72 wrote:The future of movies lies in inhumane soulless robot junk like this and Dunkirk and Spider-Man: Homecoming I guess
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
LoathedVermin72 wrote:The future of movies lies in inhumane soulless robot junk like this and Dunkirk and Spider-Man: Homecoming I guess
And Star Wars. Don’t forget that.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33835
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Good pointE.H. Ruddock wrote:As long as they are still making F&F movies, there's hopeLoathedVermin72 wrote:The future of movies lies in inhumane soulless robot junk like this and Dunkirk and Spider-Man: Homecoming I guess
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33835
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
At least TLJ had a LITTLE eccentricity from time to timedimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:The future of movies lies in inhumane soulless robot junk like this and Dunkirk and Spider-Man: Homecoming I guess
And Star Wars. Don’t forget that.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
A little?LoathedVermin72 wrote:At least TLJ had a LITTLE eccentricity from time to timedimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:The future of movies lies in inhumane soulless robot junk like this and Dunkirk and Spider-Man: Homecoming I guess
And Star Wars. Don’t forget that.
I have vast swathes of Star Wars fans on twitter that would like to hear about your ‘little eccentric’
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42769
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Please guys, dont contaminate this thread with you SW fight.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Not at all. Verm and I are solidly on the same page about this here film.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
strange bedfellowsdimejinky99 wrote:Not at all. Verm and I are solidly on the same page about this here film.