MLB

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

PHATJ wrote:Fangraphs sucks at predicting win totals
Everyone sucks at it.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

MadTIGERmaN wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:Fangraphs has the Brewers with a 76-win projection after the trade/signing
yup, 10 less than last year, and the only player they lost was Jimmy Nelson and his 12 wins. With the Reds and Pirates in the division, I dont see how the Brewers and Cubs dont finish well above .500
I think they'll be better than that too, but basing it on the team record last year isn't a great idea. If a team has a lot of luck, health, and a bunch of career years from players, it's a bad idea to expect those things to carry forward into the next season.
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15608
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

MadTIGERmaN wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:Fangraphs has the Brewers with a 76-win projection after the trade/signing
yup, 10 less than last year, and the only player they lost was Jimmy Nelson and his 12 wins. With the Reds and Pirates in the division, I dont see how the Brewers and Cubs dont finish well above .500
They had like 3-4 guys that had ridiculous, sometimes career, years last year. They’re bound to regress. Thames’s second half compared to his first is a good example.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

cutuphalfdead wrote:PECOTA or GTFO
NERDS
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37473
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:PECOTA or GTFO
NERDS
I'm sorry, how many Bellhorn championships have you won?
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15608
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

pete, how many wins does PECOTA have for your dart team this coming up season?
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37473
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

97
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15608
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

regress to the mean
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37473
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

Our (adjusted) win total this season was 105. We're going up a level so that's why PECOTA is projecting us to have 8 fewer wins. 97 is still a damned good season.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:PECOTA or GTFO
NERDS
I'm sorry, how many Bellhorn championships have you won?
The same amount of championships you’ve won when you weren’t controlling the league.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37473
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:PECOTA or GTFO
NERDS
I'm sorry, how many Bellhorn championships have you won?
The same amount of championships you’ve won when you weren’t controlling the league.
I will not have my integrity impugned.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

I’m just stating a fact, no commentary on anyone’s integrity.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37473
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

I will cut you.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

I may have stumbled onto something here.
User avatar
MadTIGERmaN
AnalLog
Posts: 1646
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:12 am
Location: The Jungle

Re: MLB

Post by MadTIGERmaN »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
MadTIGERmaN wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:Fangraphs has the Brewers with a 76-win projection after the trade/signing
yup, 10 less than last year, and the only player they lost was Jimmy Nelson and his 12 wins. With the Reds and Pirates in the division, I dont see how the Brewers and Cubs dont finish well above .500
They had like 3-4 guys that had ridiculous, sometimes career, years last year. They’re bound to regress. Thames’s second half compared to his first is a good example.
But now Thames has a full season under his belt and knows what to expect, so, the fatigue that hit in the second half, may not be as drastic this year. That and theres already talk of Braun playing some 1B and having an OF of Yelich, Cain and Santana (I'm still betting Santana gets moved at some point though)

Either way, I get what youre saying about basing this year off of last year, but the Pirates and Reds should, be pretty bad again this year. Id say the Brewers and Cubs will be neck and neck for the division most of the year with the Cards being the Cards lingering just close enough to make ya watch them (which should be hovering around .500)
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35978
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: MLB

Post by spike »

MadTIGERmaN wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
MadTIGERmaN wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:Fangraphs has the Brewers with a 76-win projection after the trade/signing
yup, 10 less than last year, and the only player they lost was Jimmy Nelson and his 12 wins. With the Reds and Pirates in the division, I dont see how the Brewers and Cubs dont finish well above .500
They had like 3-4 guys that had ridiculous, sometimes career, years last year. They’re bound to regress. Thames’s second half compared to his first is a good example.
But now Thames has a full season under his belt and knows what to expect, so, the fatigue that hit in the second half, may not be as drastic this year. That and theres already talk of Braun playing some 1B and having an OF of Yelich, Cain and Santana (I'm still betting Santana gets moved at some point though)

Either way, I get what youre saying about basing this year off of last year, but the Pirates and Reds should, be pretty bad again this year. Id say the Brewers and Cubs will be neck and neck for the division most of the year with the Cards being the Cards lingering just close enough to make ya watch them (which should be hovering around .500)
i gotta think they move santana or phillips (i don't see broxton getting much interest) for starting pitching. if they could get a guy like chris archer - or even patrick corbin or danny salazar - in a trade, then manage to lure yu darvish, folks would have to start taking their 2018 chances seriously.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

So will Vlad Jr have to wait until his second year to get in like his dad, or will he be a first ballot guy?
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: MLB

Post by verb_to_trust »

Good riddance chief wahoo
Dick/Balls
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

verb_to_trust wrote:Good riddance chief wahoo
This is going to draw out a lot of hilarious responses from people who are "totally not racist at all but..."
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Electromatic »

philpritchard wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:Good riddance chief wahoo
This is going to draw out a lot of hilarious responses from people who are "totally not racist at all but..."

Just change all the names. The Braves, the Chiefs, the Redskins.... the Seminoles etc.

The Washington Bullets changed their name for goodness sakes. Team mascots should not be news. Change the names pick an animal or a machine of some type.... move on.
Post Reply