Tchad Blake appreciation thread
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
Selected awesomeness
1986 Crowded House, Crowded House (engineer)
1986 Daring Adventures, Richard Thompson (engineer)
1987 Franks Wild Years, Tom Waits (engineer)
1988 Amnesia, Richard Thompson (engineer)
1989 Flowers in the Dirt, Paul McCartney (engineer)
1991 Rumor and Sigh, Richard Thompson (engineer, mixing, overdub engineer)
1991 Woodface, Crowded House (engineer, overdub engineer)
1992 Bone Machine, Tom Waits (engineer)
1993 The Black Rider, Tom Waits (engineer)
1994 13 Steps Lead Down, Elvis Costello (engineer, mixing)
1994 Brutal Youth, Elvis Costello (engineer, mixing)
1994 The Last Prophet, Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan (mixing)
1995 Ron Sexsmith, Ron Sexsmith (engineer, mixing, sounds, special effects)
1996 Dead Man Walking: Music from and Inspired by the Motion Picture, (bass, engineer, mixing)
2000 Binaural, Pearl Jam (mixing, portraits, producer)
2000 Come to Where I'm From, Joseph Arthur (mixing)
2000 OVO, Peter Gabriel (mixing)
2002 Redemption's Son, Joseph Arthur (engineer, mixing, producer)
2002 Trust, Low (audio engineer, mixing)
2002 Up, Peter Gabriel (main personnel, mixing, scratching, tapes, treatments)
2003 Lost Dogs: Rarities and B Sides, Pearl Jam (compilation producer, engineer, mixing, producer, wurlitzer)
2006 Orphans (Brawlers, Bawlers & Bastards), Tom Waits (engineer)
2006 Remixes, Four Tet (mixing)
2006 Surprise, Paul Simon (mixing)
2010 Black Keys, Brothers (mixing)
1986 Crowded House, Crowded House (engineer)
1986 Daring Adventures, Richard Thompson (engineer)
1987 Franks Wild Years, Tom Waits (engineer)
1988 Amnesia, Richard Thompson (engineer)
1989 Flowers in the Dirt, Paul McCartney (engineer)
1991 Rumor and Sigh, Richard Thompson (engineer, mixing, overdub engineer)
1991 Woodface, Crowded House (engineer, overdub engineer)
1992 Bone Machine, Tom Waits (engineer)
1993 The Black Rider, Tom Waits (engineer)
1994 13 Steps Lead Down, Elvis Costello (engineer, mixing)
1994 Brutal Youth, Elvis Costello (engineer, mixing)
1994 The Last Prophet, Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan (mixing)
1995 Ron Sexsmith, Ron Sexsmith (engineer, mixing, sounds, special effects)
1996 Dead Man Walking: Music from and Inspired by the Motion Picture, (bass, engineer, mixing)
2000 Binaural, Pearl Jam (mixing, portraits, producer)
2000 Come to Where I'm From, Joseph Arthur (mixing)
2000 OVO, Peter Gabriel (mixing)
2002 Redemption's Son, Joseph Arthur (engineer, mixing, producer)
2002 Trust, Low (audio engineer, mixing)
2002 Up, Peter Gabriel (main personnel, mixing, scratching, tapes, treatments)
2003 Lost Dogs: Rarities and B Sides, Pearl Jam (compilation producer, engineer, mixing, producer, wurlitzer)
2006 Orphans (Brawlers, Bawlers & Bastards), Tom Waits (engineer)
2006 Remixes, Four Tet (mixing)
2006 Surprise, Paul Simon (mixing)
2010 Black Keys, Brothers (mixing)
(patriotic choking noises)
- Thejambi
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4301
- Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
- Location: Potato
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
So say we all.--- wrote:"...Vedder explained, 'We'd rather challenge our fans and make them listen to our songs than give them something that's easy to digest. There is a lot of music out there that is very easy to digest but we never wanted to be part of it.'"
RIP Pearl Jam
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
- ---
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
hey mcparadigm i read that one post you wrote where you said few listeners understand precisely just how significant the production of a song influences its reception. what were you driving at with that?
-
digster
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
Sounds accurate enough. I remember a radio interview from a few years back saying that Stone was into playing the songs he wrote for Binaural. Maybe I'm remembering that wrong.theplatypus wrote:digster wrote:"Imaginary Magazine" is all too literal.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
I dunno, I never found PJ music easy to digest and I still don't. Some of it's made me sick recently.Thejambi wrote:So say we all.--- wrote:"...Vedder explained, 'We'd rather challenge our fans and make them listen to our songs than give them something that's easy to digest. There is a lot of music out there that is very easy to digest but we never wanted to be part of it.'"
RIP Pearl Jam
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- Thejambi
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4301
- Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
- Location: Potato
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
Yeah, yeah, yeah!harmless wrote:I dunno, I never found PJ music easy to digest and I still don't. Some of it's made me sick recently.Thejambi wrote:So say we all.--- wrote:"...Vedder explained, 'We'd rather challenge our fans and make them listen to our songs than give them something that's easy to digest. There is a lot of music out there that is very easy to digest but we never wanted to be part of it.'"
RIP Pearl Jam
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
- Lament
- Commissioner
- Posts: 11792
- Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
You left out him doing most of the mixing on ...The Dandy Warhols Come Down (specifically all of the best songs). That's one of the very best albums he's ever been a part of.McParadigm wrote:Selected awesomeness
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
- EJ
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7053
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
have the pre-BOB mixing versions of Binaural songs ever surfaced?
-
gardenparty
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 11:52 pm
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
Tape Op Interview (issue #16)
Well, on your current project you’ve been working with a hugely successful band [Pearl Jam] on an enormous record label [Epic/Sony], have you felt big expectations from them?
Just from the band. I just want to make a record that’s good for the band. So it’s really about my own expectations. And I can be pretty hard on myself. It’s a matter of working with new people in a new studio in a new town [Seattle] for a long period of time.
How long have you been at it?
I was here a month in September, it’s been 3 weeks this month [November], and it’s probably going to be 2 weeks in the new year. And I’m used to doing a record in 4 weeks, 5 maybe. Mixed, done. Usually in a situation when you have a concentrated time. And this is different - everybody in the band has other things going on. Important stuff, like benefits, and shows to do, or a record company to run. So it’s a little bit piecemeal. People coming in, one at a time, doing specific parts. They’re used to it, it’s easy for them. And it’s a new kind of music for me to be working on - which I really like. I’m getting to stretch a little bit here. But I’m also trying to bring some of my sensibilities to it. But hopefully not too much. So my concern is that I’m helping them make the record they want to make. I’m being careful about that. I’m talking with everybody. That’s a different role for me. It’s not quite as, “Let’s just throw things down.” It’s a little more considered. It involves re-doing things that someone doesn’t like a few days later. That sort of stuff.
Have you had any specific directives?
Oh no, they’re open for a lot of stuff.
Lots of experimentation?
Oh yeah, they’re ready to do another kind of record. And I think we’re getting there.
To use a metaphor, some producers’ style might be like a soup base, to which an artist adds his/her own ingredients. But some, like yours for instance, are a spicy jambalaya from the start. Is it possible that in some cases you run the risk of overwhelming the project with your recipe?
Maybe so, yeah. But I’m trying to make sure that doesn’t happen here. I don’t want to just come in and put my stamp on the record. I want it to be the band’s project where I just add a few spices to the stew. So like I said I think we’re getting there. But technically it’s difficult because I think I have a hard time doing both: producing and engineering. Although Matt Bayles, who’s engineering this, really is great. But I can’t help [doing some of the engineering], I’ve been at it for too long. Sometimes I get so caught up in the sounds, say the snare drum, that I miss a verse, how the lyrics went. It’s hard to split my focus. So the mix of this will be at the Sound Factory, and that’s where I think I’ll really be able to lighten up and fly a little bit. Because I’ll be in familiar surroundings and I won’t have to think about any of the technical aspects of the process.
Let’s talk a little about gear. So what’s your relationship with the analog and digital mediums, respectively?
I’ve heard both sound good, and both sound bad. And it depends on the budget. Most people I work with aren’t like Pearl Jam or Sheryl Crow. They’re on smaller budgets and it’s cheaper to do analogue, that’s changing I know. Maybe not if someone owns [their own] Pro Tools and as far as editing goes, I love cutting tape. I come from the day when that was the way you worked and I love it. So I guess analog takes precedence.
Are you tracking on tape with Pearl Jam?
Yup. But they’ve got the new Pro Tools system set up. There are about 2 songs where I’ve spread the drums out all over the place - a compressed track, a SansAmp track, a room track, and then all the separate [close mic] tracks. And I’m keeping that way for now. And that’s taken up a lot of tracks. But some other things, like percussion and vocals, will probably go to Pro Tools directly. And then I’ll find a track to dump it to on the 24-track later. We have both going. I save everything to Pro Tools.
Anything new and strange you’ve used in making this record?
Well, I love the new Moog pedals. I’ve got those. The phaser is actually very cool. It’s actually like a little filter box. I’ve always wanted a phaser that you could actually stop. You get a filtering that you, like, in the throe of its phase modulation you can just stop and keep in that place. Very cool.
And how have you been using that?
On guitar and there’s a couple of drum things I’m going to use it on. And probably a vocal or two. Oh and here’s something for your readers. I’ve had this for years, but I’ve only used it once or twice in 10 years where it stuck. It’s a Ludwig Phase 2 synthesizer, made in the ‘70s. It’s a big box with a pedal that switches on like a wah-wah. It’s got all these settings - one that’s called “vowel,” one that’s called “parallel, I don’t know what else. Anyway, Mike McCready has really taken to this box and he’s probably gotten the best sounds I’ve heard out of it. Ludwig for crying out loud. It’s really a low-fi, bad, bad box and it’s looming large on the project. [laughs]
Well, on your current project you’ve been working with a hugely successful band [Pearl Jam] on an enormous record label [Epic/Sony], have you felt big expectations from them?
Just from the band. I just want to make a record that’s good for the band. So it’s really about my own expectations. And I can be pretty hard on myself. It’s a matter of working with new people in a new studio in a new town [Seattle] for a long period of time.
How long have you been at it?
I was here a month in September, it’s been 3 weeks this month [November], and it’s probably going to be 2 weeks in the new year. And I’m used to doing a record in 4 weeks, 5 maybe. Mixed, done. Usually in a situation when you have a concentrated time. And this is different - everybody in the band has other things going on. Important stuff, like benefits, and shows to do, or a record company to run. So it’s a little bit piecemeal. People coming in, one at a time, doing specific parts. They’re used to it, it’s easy for them. And it’s a new kind of music for me to be working on - which I really like. I’m getting to stretch a little bit here. But I’m also trying to bring some of my sensibilities to it. But hopefully not too much. So my concern is that I’m helping them make the record they want to make. I’m being careful about that. I’m talking with everybody. That’s a different role for me. It’s not quite as, “Let’s just throw things down.” It’s a little more considered. It involves re-doing things that someone doesn’t like a few days later. That sort of stuff.
Have you had any specific directives?
Oh no, they’re open for a lot of stuff.
Lots of experimentation?
Oh yeah, they’re ready to do another kind of record. And I think we’re getting there.
To use a metaphor, some producers’ style might be like a soup base, to which an artist adds his/her own ingredients. But some, like yours for instance, are a spicy jambalaya from the start. Is it possible that in some cases you run the risk of overwhelming the project with your recipe?
Maybe so, yeah. But I’m trying to make sure that doesn’t happen here. I don’t want to just come in and put my stamp on the record. I want it to be the band’s project where I just add a few spices to the stew. So like I said I think we’re getting there. But technically it’s difficult because I think I have a hard time doing both: producing and engineering. Although Matt Bayles, who’s engineering this, really is great. But I can’t help [doing some of the engineering], I’ve been at it for too long. Sometimes I get so caught up in the sounds, say the snare drum, that I miss a verse, how the lyrics went. It’s hard to split my focus. So the mix of this will be at the Sound Factory, and that’s where I think I’ll really be able to lighten up and fly a little bit. Because I’ll be in familiar surroundings and I won’t have to think about any of the technical aspects of the process.
Let’s talk a little about gear. So what’s your relationship with the analog and digital mediums, respectively?
I’ve heard both sound good, and both sound bad. And it depends on the budget. Most people I work with aren’t like Pearl Jam or Sheryl Crow. They’re on smaller budgets and it’s cheaper to do analogue, that’s changing I know. Maybe not if someone owns [their own] Pro Tools and as far as editing goes, I love cutting tape. I come from the day when that was the way you worked and I love it. So I guess analog takes precedence.
Are you tracking on tape with Pearl Jam?
Yup. But they’ve got the new Pro Tools system set up. There are about 2 songs where I’ve spread the drums out all over the place - a compressed track, a SansAmp track, a room track, and then all the separate [close mic] tracks. And I’m keeping that way for now. And that’s taken up a lot of tracks. But some other things, like percussion and vocals, will probably go to Pro Tools directly. And then I’ll find a track to dump it to on the 24-track later. We have both going. I save everything to Pro Tools.
Anything new and strange you’ve used in making this record?
Well, I love the new Moog pedals. I’ve got those. The phaser is actually very cool. It’s actually like a little filter box. I’ve always wanted a phaser that you could actually stop. You get a filtering that you, like, in the throe of its phase modulation you can just stop and keep in that place. Very cool.
And how have you been using that?
On guitar and there’s a couple of drum things I’m going to use it on. And probably a vocal or two. Oh and here’s something for your readers. I’ve had this for years, but I’ve only used it once or twice in 10 years where it stuck. It’s a Ludwig Phase 2 synthesizer, made in the ‘70s. It’s a big box with a pedal that switches on like a wah-wah. It’s got all these settings - one that’s called “vowel,” one that’s called “parallel, I don’t know what else. Anyway, Mike McCready has really taken to this box and he’s probably gotten the best sounds I’ve heard out of it. Ludwig for crying out loud. It’s really a low-fi, bad, bad box and it’s looming large on the project. [laughs]
- Thejambi
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4301
- Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
- Location: Potato
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
Dunno if its pre or not but there are a handful of early mixesEJ wrote:have the pre-BOB mixing versions of Binaural songs ever surfaced?
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
-
warehouse
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
Thejambi wrote:Yeah, yeah, yeah!harmless wrote:I dunno, I never found PJ music easy to digest and I still don't. Some of it's made me sick recently.Thejambi wrote:So say we all.--- wrote:"...Vedder explained, 'We'd rather challenge our fans and make them listen to our songs than give them something that's easy to digest. There is a lot of music out there that is very easy to digest but we never wanted to be part of it.'"
RIP Pearl Jam
- stupidmop
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2796
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
I read some binaural era interviews yesterday and one of em mentioned that it was ed and Jeff that really wanted to use Blake. Something about creating space around songs
. They also mentioned they called bob back.in to mix the faster songs, because he's good at that kind of thing.
- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22220
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
Is it "Chad" or "Tee-Chad"?
- Thejambi
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4301
- Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
- Location: Potato
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
Tcha!bodysnatcher wrote:Is it "Chad" or "Tee-Chad"?
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
it's hard for me to get a handle on what I think about him because Binaural isn't overflowing with songs I love.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22220
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
stip wrote:it's hard for me to get a handle on what I think about him because Binaural isn't overflowing with songs I love.
- Thejambi
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4301
- Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
- Location: Potato
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
bodysnatcher wrote:stip wrote:it's hard for me to get a handle on what I think about him because Binaural isn't overflowing with songs I love.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
- Hatfield
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1512
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 8:54 pm
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
Blake is to Grievance as BoB is to Speed of Sound What the fuck happened?!
Seeing it on Letterman and then hearing it on disc a couple months later was a huge let down.
Seeing it on Letterman and then hearing it on disc a couple months later was a huge let down.
Last edited by Hatfield on Tue July 30, 2013 8:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
The only thing that 'happened' to Supersonic happened the second someone fucking wrote it. It was hardly Brendan O'Brien's fault.Hatfield wrote:Blake is to Grievance as BoB is to Supersonic. What the fuck happened?!
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22220
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: Tchad Blake appreciation thread
Blake : Sleight of Hand :: BOB : Speed of SoundHatfield wrote:Blake is to Grievance as BoB is to Supersonic. What the fuck happened?!
Seeing it on Letterman and then hearing it on disc a couple months later was a huge let down.