E.H. Ruddock wrote:Guys, in about five days something else will pop up and this gun control debate will die down again. Nothing ever happens. Ever.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Guys, in about five days something else will pop up and this gun control debate will die down again. Nothing ever happens. Ever.

McParadigm wrote:lol
Or when they grow up they'll realize that lobby money talks and they'll cash in.durdencommatyler wrote:I'm talking about the generation that is in high school now affecting change by the time they are my age. OBVIOUSLY this isn't happening in the next year or two. But if these kids run for local office and then become the leaders of tomorrow and then can affect real change by the time they have a majority power...
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
You definitely aren't.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm not wrong though
McParadigm wrote:lol
And they'll learn that Republicans give them tax breaks.washing machine wrote:Or when they grow up they'll realize that lobby money talks and they'll cash in.durdencommatyler wrote:I'm talking about the generation that is in high school now affecting change by the time they are my age. OBVIOUSLY this isn't happening in the next year or two. But if these kids run for local office and then become the leaders of tomorrow and then can affect real change by the time they have a majority power...
Hey this "Ben" guy seems like a real charmer:McParadigm wrote:Let’s administer a test, Bi
McParadigm wrote:lol
Have you looked at the numbers? I don't expect NRA money often puts a candidate over the top. Promoting gun control can however drive turn-out for republicans in contested districts. I don't think Bloomberg, Everytown, or the Brady campaign are very good at mobilizing voters.96583UP wrote:taking money from the NRA is a great way to get elected

Stickman wrote:
I dunno. Trust might be gone, and its not just a boogieman. The US Presbyterian church (and others) had a platform of banning handguns back in the 70s. Things have changed since then, sure, but there's a lot of reflexive push-backDscans wrote:What would it take to realistically get gun reform passed?
I think conservatives would concede some ground if they didn't think liberals had a secret agenda to repeal the second amendment.
What if liberals made a concession? Say, loosening restrictions on gun free zones, since there isn't much evidence that they work. https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/10/ ... y-laws-do/
Would that be enough to get stuff passed that most Americans agree on anyway? Stuff like preventing the mentally ill from having guns, background checks for private sellers at gun shows, or creating a federal database to track gun sales.
McParadigm wrote:lol
96583UP wrote:taking money from the NRA is a great way to get elected
The Supreme Court was pretty clear in DC v. Heller that even though they now interpret the 2nd amendment as guaranteeing an individual right to bear arms, governments CAN still regulate the sale, possession, etc. of guns. I'm sure you're right that there would be challenges to virtually any sort of restriction that gets passed, especially on a federal level, but states and local governments can also tighten their gun laws, and regardless of which level did it, they'd likely (considering what could realistically possibly get passed) be in line with current SCOTUS precedent.Simple Torture wrote:Yeah, not to be a Debbie Downer, but any real, lasting reform that won't get caught up in the courts for years will probably require a constitutional amendment. 2/3 of each house of Congress and 3/4 of state legislatures would have to support it.LoathedVermin72 wrote:We've got a lot of house cleaning to do before anything will happen.durdencommatyler wrote:If this new generation can be the ones to FINALLY do something about the gun issue in the country...![]()
![]()
Although this begs the question: can the Bill of Rights be amended? Could 2/3 of Congress and 3/4 of the legislatures rescind freedom of speech, for example? I'm not a scholar of this stuff, I dunno. Where's GH at?
What if it works and reduces school shootings? Would that be an acceptable trade off? What if it has no impact, but the mere concession allows popular gun reform to get pass that does have an effect? Would it be worth it then?LoathedVermin72 wrote:Why would anyone want to live in a hellscape that necessitates arming teachers