2018 NFL Season
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 47978
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: 2018 NFL Season
go raiders
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
-
Electromatic
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: 2018 NFL Season
Man Cousins is my hero, wow. Talk about using your leverage.
I like that.
I like that.
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29574
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: 2018 NFL Season
he loves jesus and jesus loves cash
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: 2018 NFL Season
Electromatic wrote:With what Jerrick Mckinnon just got and the way they play now, Barkley is absolutely a 3 down player, I don't think he's a great inside runner, but for outside zone he's perfect, and the line at PSU was nothing special. I don't think he'll be a great power runner between the tackles, but he shouldn't have to be. He could catch 80 passes.bada wrote:I'm not sold on Barkley. Giants aren't asking my opinion though. I just don't know if he's worth the number 2 pick. He can break big plays but I don't think he's an every down back. I wish I knew if Davis Webb could play and passing on a QB was a good idea.durdencommatyler wrote:And the Browns sign Carlos Hyde.bada wrote:The Giants actually got a LT!?!?!
Which could mean Cleveland is eyeing a QB with their #1 pick and Barkley falls to the G-Men.
Eli has protection and time to throw. They have a legit running game and a back who can catch the ball. Even if OBJ is suspended, they have a decent receiving core and a TE. Make a couple of smart moves in the draft and maybe they can make a playoff run.
I know its not sexy but I kinda hope they take that guard instead.
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: 2018 NFL Season
A guard???bada wrote:Electromatic wrote:With what Jerrick Mckinnon just got and the way they play now, Barkley is absolutely a 3 down player, I don't think he's a great inside runner, but for outside zone he's perfect, and the line at PSU was nothing special. I don't think he'll be a great power runner between the tackles, but he shouldn't have to be. He could catch 80 passes.bada wrote:I'm not sold on Barkley. Giants aren't asking my opinion though. I just don't know if he's worth the number 2 pick. He can break big plays but I don't think he's an every down back. I wish I knew if Davis Webb could play and passing on a QB was a good idea.durdencommatyler wrote:And the Browns sign Carlos Hyde.bada wrote:The Giants actually got a LT!?!?!
Which could mean Cleveland is eyeing a QB with their #1 pick and Barkley falls to the G-Men.
Eli has protection and time to throw. They have a legit running game and a back who can catch the ball. Even if OBJ is suspended, they have a decent receiving core and a TE. Make a couple of smart moves in the draft and maybe they can make a playoff run.
I know its not sexy but I kinda hope they take that guard instead.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- run2death
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 5223
- Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm
- Location: A Dark Place
Re: 2018 NFL Season
I loved the Honey Badger as much as the next Cards fan, but they made the right decision. He hasn't been the same since the ACL injury and realistically he's had one truly great season.
That ~$20M over the next two years will be better spent elsewhere.
That being said I hope he has a great year in Houston. He's a great dude.
That ~$20M over the next two years will be better spent elsewhere.
That being said I hope he has a great year in Houston. He's a great dude.
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: 2018 NFL Season
Jets and Colts maneuvering... interesting.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: 2018 NFL Season
Super interesting. But not totally surprising. Jets need a QB.elliseamos wrote:Jets and Colts maneuvering... interesting.
-
doug rr
- The Master
- Posts: 27320
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
- Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos
Re: 2018 NFL Season
stfulennytheweedwhacker wrote:go raiders
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: 2018 NFL Season
Sure, but they wouldn't get one at 6?durdencommatyler wrote:Super interesting. But not totally surprising. Jets need a QB.elliseamos wrote:Jets and Colts maneuvering... interesting.
-
Electromatic
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: 2018 NFL Season
elliseamos wrote:Sure, but they wouldn't get one at 6?durdencommatyler wrote:Super interesting. But not totally surprising. Jets need a QB.elliseamos wrote:Jets and Colts maneuvering... interesting.
What the Bears did last year and the Jets are doing this year makes little sense to me, I guess they love one particular player they don’t think makes it to 6.
I tend to think having more picks is the better strategy.
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: 2018 NFL Season
I mean, given the state of their d-line I'm not going to be shocked if this ensures they take chubb.Electromatic wrote:elliseamos wrote:Sure, but they wouldn't get one at 6?durdencommatyler wrote:Super interesting. But not totally surprising. Jets need a QB.elliseamos wrote:Jets and Colts maneuvering... interesting.
What the Bears did last year and the Jets are doing this year makes little sense to me, I guess they love one particular player they don’t think makes it to 6.
I tend to think having more picks is the better strategy.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: 2018 NFL Season
Well, sure. But maybe "their guy" is a top 3 guy. Maybe the think the Browns and the Giants are both taking a QB and they want to make sure they get the third best available. Maybe they don't like the #4 four guy as a franchise QB especially given how poorly they've drafted at the position for the last few years. I'm a big fan of the GO GET A FRANCHISE QB mentality. Sometimes you'll swing and miss but if you believe in a guy, if you think the guy is a legit future of the franchise type of player, go get him.elliseamos wrote:Sure, but they wouldn't get one at 6?durdencommatyler wrote:Super interesting. But not totally surprising. Jets need a QB.elliseamos wrote:Jets and Colts maneuvering... interesting.
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: 2018 NFL Season
I get it, I just think it's foolish to do the deal now when there's over a month until picking time. And, I think they have invested enough this offseason in QBs.durdencommatyler wrote:Well, sure. But maybe "their guy" is a top 3 guy. Maybe the think the Browns and the Giants are both taking a QB and they want to make sure they get the third best available. Maybe they don't like the #4 four guy as a franchise QB especially given how poorly they've drafted at the position for the last few years. I'm a big fan of the GO GET A FRANCHISE QB mentality. Sometimes you'll swing and miss but if you believe in a guy, if you think the guy is a legit future of the franchise type of player, go get him.elliseamos wrote:Sure, but they wouldn't get one at 6?durdencommatyler wrote:Super interesting. But not totally surprising. Jets need a QB.elliseamos wrote:Jets and Colts maneuvering... interesting.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: 2018 NFL Season
But they know much more than we do. There might be a ton of deals in the works behind the scenes and they needed to move now.elliseamos wrote:I get it, I just think it's foolish to do the deal now when there's over a month until picking time. And, I think they have invested enough this offseason in QBs.durdencommatyler wrote:Well, sure. But maybe "their guy" is a top 3 guy. Maybe the think the Browns and the Giants are both taking a QB and they want to make sure they get the third best available. Maybe they don't like the #4 four guy as a franchise QB especially given how poorly they've drafted at the position for the last few years. I'm a big fan of the GO GET A FRANCHISE QB mentality. Sometimes you'll swing and miss but if you believe in a guy, if you think the guy is a legit future of the franchise type of player, go get him.elliseamos wrote:Sure, but they wouldn't get one at 6?durdencommatyler wrote:Super interesting. But not totally surprising. Jets need a QB.elliseamos wrote:Jets and Colts maneuvering... interesting.
But again I value the QB position more than any other. We need look no further than the Vikings his past season. The QB position is invaluable, to me. And if they believe they have their guy at #3 but not at #4... I respect the move. Go get your guy. I love that. If it pays off and they land their QBotF, it's completely worth the cost.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: 2018 NFL Season
Besides, based on what the pundits are tweeting, the price is only going to go up. Maybe striking the deal now is the best move given inflation as we get closer to draft time? I don't know that for sure, but it seems possible.
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: 2018 NFL Season
I guess. But what seems to work out better is casting a wider net. Like keeping all those 2nd rounders and drafting someone to develop behind Bridgewater & McCown.durdencommatyler wrote:But they know much more than we do. There might be a ton of deals in the works behind the scenes and they needed to move now.elliseamos wrote:I get it, I just think it's foolish to do the deal now when there's over a month until picking time. And, I think they have invested enough this offseason in QBs.durdencommatyler wrote:Well, sure. But maybe "their guy" is a top 3 guy. Maybe the think the Browns and the Giants are both taking a QB and they want to make sure they get the third best available. Maybe they don't like the #4 four guy as a franchise QB especially given how poorly they've drafted at the position for the last few years. I'm a big fan of the GO GET A FRANCHISE QB mentality. Sometimes you'll swing and miss but if you believe in a guy, if you think the guy is a legit future of the franchise type of player, go get him.elliseamos wrote:Sure, but they wouldn't get one at 6?durdencommatyler wrote:Super interesting. But not totally surprising. Jets need a QB.elliseamos wrote:Jets and Colts maneuvering... interesting.
But again I value the QB position more than any other. We need look no further than the Vikings his past season. The QB position is invaluable, to me. And if they believe they have their guy at #3 but not at #4... I respect the move. Go get your guy. I love that. If it pays off and they land their QBotF, it's completely worth the cost.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: 2018 NFL Season
It's just different philosophies. I'm not saying you're wrong at all. But I can tell you from experience, what it means to a fan base to target a potential 1st round, franchise QB and then draft him. Then you can build around that guy for the future. I can't quantify what it's meant to the Chiefs fan base. Again, that guy may end up falling flat. But after decades and decades and decades of doing what you're talking about... going out, targeting, and then being bold enough to swing for it and get him is immeasurable.elliseamos wrote:I guess. But what seems to work out better is casting a wider net. Like keeping all those 2nd rounders and drafting someone to develop behind Bridgewater & McCown.durdencommatyler wrote:But they know much more than we do. There might be a ton of deals in the works behind the scenes and they needed to move now.elliseamos wrote:I get it, I just think it's foolish to do the deal now when there's over a month until picking time. And, I think they have invested enough this offseason in QBs.durdencommatyler wrote:Well, sure. But maybe "their guy" is a top 3 guy. Maybe the think the Browns and the Giants are both taking a QB and they want to make sure they get the third best available. Maybe they don't like the #4 four guy as a franchise QB especially given how poorly they've drafted at the position for the last few years. I'm a big fan of the GO GET A FRANCHISE QB mentality. Sometimes you'll swing and miss but if you believe in a guy, if you think the guy is a legit future of the franchise type of player, go get him.elliseamos wrote:Sure, but they wouldn't get one at 6?durdencommatyler wrote:Super interesting. But not totally surprising. Jets need a QB.elliseamos wrote:Jets and Colts maneuvering... interesting.
But again I value the QB position more than any other. We need look no further than the Vikings his past season. The QB position is invaluable, to me. And if they believe they have their guy at #3 but not at #4... I respect the move. Go get your guy. I love that. If it pays off and they land their QBotF, it's completely worth the cost.
Again, not saying you're wrong. Your way is super valid and obviously it's something a lot of franchises chose to do. But I've lived too many years with that model and so I understand the want/need to do things differently. Especially for a team that was almost a playoff team last year despite everyone thinking they wouldn't win a single game.
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: 2018 NFL Season
wait? Who thought the Chiefs wouldn't win a game? And, Mahomes was taken 10th overall.durdencommatyler wrote:It's just different philosophies. I'm not saying you're wrong at all. But I can tell you from experience, what it means to a fan base to target a potential 1st round, franchise QB and then draft him. Then you can build around that guy for the future. I can't quantify what it's meant to the Chiefs fan base. Again, that guy may end up falling flat. But after decades and decades and decades of doing what you're talking about... going out, targeting, and then being bold enough to swing for it and get him is immeasurable.elliseamos wrote:I guess. But what seems to work out better is casting a wider net. Like keeping all those 2nd rounders and drafting someone to develop behind Bridgewater & McCown.durdencommatyler wrote:But they know much more than we do. There might be a ton of deals in the works behind the scenes and they needed to move now.elliseamos wrote:I get it, I just think it's foolish to do the deal now when there's over a month until picking time. And, I think they have invested enough this offseason in QBs.durdencommatyler wrote:Well, sure. But maybe "their guy" is a top 3 guy. Maybe the think the Browns and the Giants are both taking a QB and they want to make sure they get the third best available. Maybe they don't like the #4 four guy as a franchise QB especially given how poorly they've drafted at the position for the last few years. I'm a big fan of the GO GET A FRANCHISE QB mentality. Sometimes you'll swing and miss but if you believe in a guy, if you think the guy is a legit future of the franchise type of player, go get him.elliseamos wrote:Sure, but they wouldn't get one at 6?durdencommatyler wrote:Super interesting. But not totally surprising. Jets need a QB.elliseamos wrote:Jets and Colts maneuvering... interesting.
But again I value the QB position more than any other. We need look no further than the Vikings his past season. The QB position is invaluable, to me. And if they believe they have their guy at #3 but not at #4... I respect the move. Go get your guy. I love that. If it pays off and they land their QBotF, it's completely worth the cost.
Again, not saying you're wrong. Your way is super valid and obviously it's something a lot of franchises chose to do. But I've lived too many years with that model and so I understand the want/need to do things differently. Especially for a team that was almost a playoff team last year despite everyone thinking they wouldn't win a single game.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: 2018 NFL Season
No, I'm saying last year people thought the Jets wouldn't win a game. For a team coming off a year where they surprised everyone (the Jets) maybe they (management) thinks the team is closer to competing than others think.elliseamos wrote:wait? Who thought the Chiefs wouldn't win a game? And, Mahomes was taken 10th overall.durdencommatyler wrote:It's just different philosophies. I'm not saying you're wrong at all. But I can tell you from experience, what it means to a fan base to target a potential 1st round, franchise QB and then draft him. Then you can build around that guy for the future. I can't quantify what it's meant to the Chiefs fan base. Again, that guy may end up falling flat. But after decades and decades and decades of doing what you're talking about... going out, targeting, and then being bold enough to swing for it and get him is immeasurable.elliseamos wrote:I guess. But what seems to work out better is casting a wider net. Like keeping all those 2nd rounders and drafting someone to develop behind Bridgewater & McCown.durdencommatyler wrote:But they know much more than we do. There might be a ton of deals in the works behind the scenes and they needed to move now.elliseamos wrote:I get it, I just think it's foolish to do the deal now when there's over a month until picking time. And, I think they have invested enough this offseason in QBs.durdencommatyler wrote:Well, sure. But maybe "their guy" is a top 3 guy. Maybe the think the Browns and the Giants are both taking a QB and they want to make sure they get the third best available. Maybe they don't like the #4 four guy as a franchise QB especially given how poorly they've drafted at the position for the last few years. I'm a big fan of the GO GET A FRANCHISE QB mentality. Sometimes you'll swing and miss but if you believe in a guy, if you think the guy is a legit future of the franchise type of player, go get him.elliseamos wrote:Sure, but they wouldn't get one at 6?durdencommatyler wrote:Super interesting. But not totally surprising. Jets need a QB.elliseamos wrote:Jets and Colts maneuvering... interesting.
But again I value the QB position more than any other. We need look no further than the Vikings his past season. The QB position is invaluable, to me. And if they believe they have their guy at #3 but not at #4... I respect the move. Go get your guy. I love that. If it pays off and they land their QBotF, it's completely worth the cost.
Again, not saying you're wrong. Your way is super valid and obviously it's something a lot of franchises chose to do. But I've lived too many years with that model and so I understand the want/need to do things differently. Especially for a team that was almost a playoff team last year despite everyone thinking they wouldn't win a single game.
The Chiefs also gave up a good amount to move up and snatch Mahomes; a move I was in full support of.