Can't Deny Me

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by McParadigm »

This thread is a good sign for the new album
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37454
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by Norah »

stip wrote:
Ledbetterman10 wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
B wrote:Anyone think this song would be better if it was 25% faster?
Here it is 25% faster. You be the judge.

Sounds a little better.

Actually, if I'm not mistaken, this is sort of how Spin The Black Circle was composed. Stone had the riff but it was way slower. Eddie wanted it faster so they sped it up and that's the song we know today. Not sure where I read that though. Maybe the PJ20 book?
I think I like this more sped up, too.
just wait til you see it live
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22296
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by bodysnatcher »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
stip wrote:
Ledbetterman10 wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
B wrote:Anyone think this song would be better if it was 25% faster?
Here it is 25% faster. You be the judge.

Sounds a little better.

Actually, if I'm not mistaken, this is sort of how Spin The Black Circle was composed. Stone had the riff but it was way slower. Eddie wanted it faster so they sped it up and that's the song we know today. Not sure where I read that though. Maybe the PJ20 book?
I think I like this more sped up, too.
just wait til you see it live
https://youtu.be/4X4Fy8YqysY?t=3m2s
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29884
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by 96583UP »

billy billy micromachenis
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by evenslow »

stip wrote:
Ledbetterman10 wrote:
tree_ wrote:I wonder if Ed plays this for his wife and she just doesn't have the heart to tell him he sounds like shit. Someone in their inner circles need to do them a favor and let them know how horrible they sound. Do all their families just pretend this kind of shit is good? What about the producer? I'm getting the impression they're all in an echo chamber, never questioning themselves or considering this shit might be bad and to actually work hard on something like they used to. They can't have just lost all their creativity and it must have to do with work ethic? Right?
I don't think it's the responsibility of a spouse or anyone else in an inner-circle to do that. I think someone else in the band has to tell him if they think something sounds like shit. But maybe they just don't think it sounds like shit.

Just ducking in for my periodic reminder that outside of Red Mosquito this was actually a pretty well received album. Not a classic, by any means, but it was well reviewed, sold well, had a huge hit. So this conversation won't happen until an album falls flat.
this kind of reasoned analysis has no place here stip.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36758
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by Jorge »

Deferring to consensus isn't analysis
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by stip »

That wasn't me to consensus. That was the citing of evidence to undercut a deeply held religious conviction by a narrow circle of people.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46239
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by BurtReynolds »

Stip the Eternal Appeal to Authority.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36758
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by Jorge »

stip wrote:That wasn't me to consensus. That was the citing of evidence to undercut a deeply held religious conviction by a narrow circle of people.
Evidence against what? Was someone making the argument that Backspacer had received bad reviews and sold poorly?
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36758
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by Jorge »

Because it sounds like you're using "it received good reviews and it sold well" as an argument against people saying "this sucks" and I'm pretty sure you can see the problem with that
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

I cannot contribute to PJ threads in other forums because it's always full of people who hate the middle period and totally buy into the "return to form with S/T" bullshit. I guess people want commercialism rather than creativity. It's sad.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by stip »

theplatypus wrote:
stip wrote:That wasn't me to consensus. That was the citing of evidence to undercut a deeply held religious conviction by a narrow circle of people.
Evidence against what? Was someone making the argument that Backspacer had received bad reviews and sold poorly?
No, but there was a whole discussion about how terrible the recent albums were and how someone has an obligation to finally tell them that everything they do is awful so they could go back to making good albums. It is the dominant narrative about the last decade of the band (followed by the potentially more irritating PRAMG), and I am pointing out that this narrative probably doesn't hold up outside of this forum (or, more accurately, the disgruntled elements of the fan community). Also, that Eddie's wife, or the producer, or the band, or whoever, probably has no reason to tell Eddie or the band that everything they do sucks because their wider audience evidently doesn't see things that way.

Because it sounds like you're using "it received good reviews and it sold well" as an argument against people saying "this sucks" and I'm pretty sure you can see the problem with that
Yeah, that obviously doesn't work if the point is to tell someone that they're wrong to dislike something because other people like it. But it is, I think, a rebuttal against the idea that Pearl Jam keeps 'failing', and a reminder that RM is an echo chamber
User avatar
WtOB?
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 7:03 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/humdinger_dman
Location: by the ocean
Contact:

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by WtOB? »

it's not only RM that thinks backspacer aint no good, brah.
Dev wrote:i love listening to the leaked pj song "last word".
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by stip »

RM plus a few guys that WTOB? knows
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by stip »

BurtReynolds wrote:Stip the Eternal Appeal to Authority.
Yes, but at least I'm appealing to TWO gods
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by evenslow »

stip wrote:RM plus a few guys that WTOB? knows
:lol:
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25049
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by B »

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:I cannot contribute to PJ threads in other forums because it's always full of people who hate the middle period and totally buy into the "return to form with S/T" bullshit. I guess people want commercialism rather than creativity. It's sad.
Return to form? Really? People say that.

At best, I figured they found a comfortable autopilot.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

B wrote:
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:I cannot contribute to PJ threads in other forums because it's always full of people who hate the middle period and totally buy into the "return to form with S/T" bullshit. I guess people want commercialism rather than creativity. It's sad.
Return to form? Really? People say that.

At best, I figured they found a comfortable autopilot.
Someone was arguing with me that they weren't truly "creative" until S/T, and people were agreeing. I wanted to puke. I don't know if people truly see things this way or if they are just buying into marketing hype, but it makes no sense.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by stip »

That's a pretty tough sell, but there is something to the 'return to form' argument insofar as the last few albums are more immediate, accessible, outward facing albums compared to the Vitalogy - Riot Act run (with the exception of Yield). If that's what you're looking for in pearl jam, that's the approach they've adopted. How more of less 'creative' it is, how good the songs are, etc. is obviously debatable.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25049
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Can't Deny Me (2017 Christmas Single)

Post by B »

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:
B wrote:
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:I cannot contribute to PJ threads in other forums because it's always full of people who hate the middle period and totally buy into the "return to form with S/T" bullshit. I guess people want commercialism rather than creativity. It's sad.
Return to form? Really? People say that.

At best, I figured they found a comfortable autopilot.
Someone was arguing with me that they weren't truly "creative" until S/T, and people were agreeing. I wanted to puke. I don't know if people truly see things this way or if they are just buying into marketing hype, but it makes no sense.
I'm glad people find joy in Pearl Jam. It doesn't make me sick to hear those opinions, but I can't agree with the last 3 albums being "truly creative."
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
Post Reply