Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequel)

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
darth_vedder
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6467
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by darth_vedder »

Birds in Hell wrote:
darth_vedder wrote:Are there any ‘98 versions of No Way?
Only audience recordings.
Ah, bummer. Hopefully a few more ‘98 vault shows surface someday, particularly one with No Way.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37328
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by Norah »

No Way has never been very good live.
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28035
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by Monkey_Driven »

cutuphalfdead wrote:No Way has never been very good live.
Nope, probably why they rarely play it.
User avatar
ridleybradout
Future Drummer
Posts: 2551
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
Location: Rand McNally

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by ridleybradout »

darth_vedder wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:
darth_vedder wrote:Are there any ‘98 versions of No Way?
Only audience recordings.
Ah, bummer. Hopefully a few more ‘98 vault shows surface someday, particularly one with No Way.
I'm praying for a Pacific 1998 show (anything besides Melbourne 1998-03-05 obviously). Unfortunately they didn't play No Way until the US tour with Matt. The only time No Way with Jack was captured is a short clip on Single Video Theory.
User avatar
mray10
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 434
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:54 pm

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by mray10 »

I like that Low Light from Halifax, but have no issue with the Benaroya version either. Big no on the Wrigley version, though.
User avatar
darth_vedder
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6467
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by darth_vedder »

Monkey_Driven wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:No Way has never been very good live.
Nope, probably why they rarely play it.
This doesn't sound bad (performance, not actual sound):
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by bada »

darth_vedder wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:No Way has never been very good live.
Nope, probably why they rarely play it.
This doesn't sound bad (performance, not actual sound):

That's the band I remember.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by bodysnatcher »

hey i was there, woot
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37328
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by Norah »

I want a vault release of that show just so we can get a high quality recording of No Way from before the band started to suck.
User avatar
ridleybradout
Future Drummer
Posts: 2551
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
Location: Rand McNally

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by ridleybradout »

ducko wrote: Untitled
- Camden 2000-09-02
- Global Citizens 2015-09-26
- West Palm Beach 2003-04-11

I don't believe this should be in the main mix as it wasn't on the original album. Perhaps a B-side list? The Lo2L version is the one for me.
This raises a good point. On the one hand, Untitled is undoubtedly linked to MFC as an intro, and I've always kind of considered it a stand-in for Red dot.

But on the other it was not part of Yield, and so could be considered a B-side to put at the end with Leatherman and U.

I think if I end up choosing Untitled and MFC from the same show they should probably go together, but even if I don't I could easily make them sound nice next to each other with some quick fades (so that they also serve as standalone tracks).

Thoughts?...
User avatar
mray10
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 434
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:54 pm

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by mray10 »

ridleybradout wrote:
ducko wrote: Untitled
- Camden 2000-09-02
- Global Citizens 2015-09-26
- West Palm Beach 2003-04-11

I don't believe this should be in the main mix as it wasn't on the original album. Perhaps a B-side list? The Lo2L version is the one for me.
This raises a good point. On the one hand, Untitled is undoubtedly linked to MFC as an intro, and I've always kind of considered it a stand-in for Red dot.

But on the other it was not part of Yield, and so could be considered a B-side to put at the end with Leatherman and U.

I think if I end up choosing Untitled and MFC from the same show they should probably go together, but even if I don't I could easily make them sound nice next to each other with some quick fades (so that they also serve as standalone tracks).

Thoughts?...
I love them together, but it's not a strong opinion. Untitled by itself at the end (or leading into Leatherman) would feel odd, though.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37328
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by Norah »

ridleybradout wrote:
ducko wrote: Untitled
- Camden 2000-09-02
- Global Citizens 2015-09-26
- West Palm Beach 2003-04-11

I don't believe this should be in the main mix as it wasn't on the original album. Perhaps a B-side list? The Lo2L version is the one for me.
This raises a good point. On the one hand, Untitled is undoubtedly linked to MFC as an intro, and I've always kind of considered it a stand-in for Red dot.

But on the other it was not part of Yield, and so could be considered a B-side to put at the end with Leatherman and U.

I think if I end up choosing Untitled and MFC from the same show they should probably go together, but even if I don't I could easily make them sound nice next to each other with some quick fades (so that they also serve as standalone tracks).

Thoughts?...
I think you should link them if possible. It's the live stand in for Red Dot.

Also, if you can use L2L Untitled into Melbourne 98 MFC that would be best.
rimb
A Return To Form
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 11:09 am

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by rimb »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
ridleybradout wrote:
ducko wrote: Untitled
- Camden 2000-09-02
- Global Citizens 2015-09-26
- West Palm Beach 2003-04-11

I don't believe this should be in the main mix as it wasn't on the original album. Perhaps a B-side list? The Lo2L version is the one for me.
This raises a good point. On the one hand, Untitled is undoubtedly linked to MFC as an intro, and I've always kind of considered it a stand-in for Red dot.

But on the other it was not part of Yield, and so could be considered a B-side to put at the end with Leatherman and U.

I think if I end up choosing Untitled and MFC from the same show they should probably go together, but even if I don't I could easily make them sound nice next to each other with some quick fades (so that they also serve as standalone tracks).

Thoughts?...
I think you should link them if possible. It's the live stand in for Red Dot.

Also, if you can use L2L Untitled into Melbourne 98 MFC that would be best.

Yeah, definitely in favour of linking them - it's how they're presented live most of the time (all of the time for Untitled).
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by PHATJ »

bada wrote:
darth_vedder wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:No Way has never been very good live.
Nope, probably why they rarely play it.
This doesn't sound bad (performance, not actual sound):

That's the band I remember.
:heartbeat:
User avatar
ridleybradout
Future Drummer
Posts: 2551
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
Location: Rand McNally

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by ridleybradout »

rimb wrote: Yeah, definitely in favour of linking them - it's how they're presented live most of the time (all of the time for Untitled).
Not quite true actually ;)

rimb
A Return To Form
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 11:09 am

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by rimb »

ridleybradout wrote:
rimb wrote: Yeah, definitely in favour of linking them - it's how they're presented live most of the time (all of the time for Untitled).
Not quite true actually ;)
Sorry - barely listened to a bootleg post-2006 ;)
User avatar
ridleybradout
Future Drummer
Posts: 2551
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
Location: Rand McNally

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by ridleybradout »

rimb wrote:
ridleybradout wrote:
rimb wrote: Yeah, definitely in favour of linking them - it's how they're presented live most of the time (all of the time for Untitled).
Not quite true actually ;)
Sorry - barely listened to a bootleg post-2006 ;)
A perfectly reasonable year to draw the line :thumbsup:


Have a listen to Pilate from San Diego 2000 guys.

It sounds a lot more confident than the two best Europe 2000 versions (Prague and Cardiff), plus it sounds better in comparison with Jeff turned up.

It has a minor lyrical error (drawing in, drawing circles down), but Prague has the same error and Cardiff has a different one (walking up the south marking ground)...
User avatar
ridleybradout
Future Drummer
Posts: 2551
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
Location: Rand McNally

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by ridleybradout »

cutuphalfdead wrote: Also, if you can use L2L Untitled into Melbourne 98 MFC that would be best.
Now that might be difficult.

I'm not sure about the Melb 98 MFC - sure it's got Jack, but Ed mangles the first word and Stone's effects in the intro are a bit annoying...

Anyone else besides Chud think this should be chosen over the almighty Camden 2000-09-01 version?
User avatar
doone
Future Drummer
Posts: 3404
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:17 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: right there

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by doone »

ridleybradout wrote:
rimb wrote:
ridleybradout wrote:
rimb wrote: Yeah, definitely in favour of linking them - it's how they're presented live most of the time (all of the time for Untitled).
Not quite true actually ;)
Sorry - barely listened to a bootleg post-2006 ;)
A perfectly reasonable year to draw the line :thumbsup:


Have a listen to Pilate from San Diego 2000 guys.
this is good :thumbsup:
bada wrote:Cause the two girls on the board voted for the rapey song.
User avatar
ridleybradout
Future Drummer
Posts: 2551
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
Location: Rand McNally

Re: Pearl Jam - Definitive Live Versions (a Green Habit sequ

Post by ridleybradout »

mray10 wrote:I like that Low Light from Halifax, but have no issue with the Benaroya version either. Big no on the Wrigley version, though.
Halifax is pretty great, though Jeff's voice is a bit too loud for my liking.

Benaroya feels a bit slow and flat to me - not sure.

Columbia 2016-04-21 is actually really good - pretty much flawless musically and vocally, no "fucking calm", and a quieter Jeff :P

Actually, Bern 2006-09-13 might be the happy medium between earlier and later versions.
Post Reply