NHL Thread

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: NHL Thread

Post by philpritchard »

elliseamos wrote:Yeah, I haven't looked up the details, but I'm thinking it's safe to say Toronto got the worse end of both trades involving Kessel.

And the Tuukka trade is comical.
The second Kessel trade was almost entirely about dumping his long-term salary. They got Kasperi Kapenen (who I think is going to be a really good player) and flipped the first round pick for Frederik Anderson, who has been their first reliable goalie since Belfour. Hell, even the first Kessel trade was more about mis-judging the calibre of the team (and ultimately the quality of the picks) than any issue with trading for Kessel.

I mean... all of this could have been avoided by just not making the first Kessel trade and keeping Rask instead of Pogge and instead building the team around Seguin, Hamilton, and Rask... but trading Kessel was just fine.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: NHL Thread

Post by elliseamos »

philpritchard wrote:
elliseamos wrote:Yeah, I haven't looked up the details, but I'm thinking it's safe to say Toronto got the worse end of both trades involving Kessel.

And the Tuukka trade is comical.
The second Kessel trade was almost entirely about dumping his long-term salary. They got Kasperi Kapenen (who I think is going to be a really good player) and flipped the first round pick for Frederik Anderson, who has been their first reliable goalie since Belfour. Hell, even the first Kessel trade was more about mis-judging the calibre of the team (and ultimately the quality of the picks) than any issue with trading for Kessel.

I mean... all of this could have been avoided by just not making the first Kessel trade and keeping Rask instead of Pogge and instead building the team around Seguin, Hamilton, and Rask... but trading Kessel was just fine.
Thanks. And don't forget Jared Knight was taken with TOR's 2nd round pick the same year Seguin was #2 overall. Maybe TOR would have picked Justin Faulk or Tyler Toffoli instead of Knight in that round. John Klingberg was pick in the 5th round that year, so every team can kick themselves for not taking him.

Now that I had the chance to look things up and although I'll agree that Anderson & Kapenen is a good haul for Kessel, TOR traded Kessel just before his age 27-32 seasons (he's still so young). And, although he's still costing them $1.2M against the cap, he's still not as big an anchor as Tim Gleason. WTF happened there?
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: NHL Thread

Post by philpritchard »

elliseamos wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
elliseamos wrote:Yeah, I haven't looked up the details, but I'm thinking it's safe to say Toronto got the worse end of both trades involving Kessel.

And the Tuukka trade is comical.
The second Kessel trade was almost entirely about dumping his long-term salary. They got Kasperi Kapenen (who I think is going to be a really good player) and flipped the first round pick for Frederik Anderson, who has been their first reliable goalie since Belfour. Hell, even the first Kessel trade was more about mis-judging the calibre of the team (and ultimately the quality of the picks) than any issue with trading for Kessel.

I mean... all of this could have been avoided by just not making the first Kessel trade and keeping Rask instead of Pogge and instead building the team around Seguin, Hamilton, and Rask... but trading Kessel was just fine.
Thanks. And don't forget Jared Knight was taken with TOR's 2nd round pick the same year Seguin was #2 overall. Maybe TOR would have picked Justin Faulk or Tyler Toffoli instead of Knight in that round. John Klingberg was pick in the 5th round that year, so every team can kick themselves for not taking him.

Now that I had the chance to look things up and although I'll agree that Anderson & Kapenen is a good haul for Kessel, TOR traded Kessel just before his age 27-32 seasons (he's still so young). And, although he's still costing them $1.2M against the cap, he's still not as big an anchor as Tim Gleason. WTF happened there?
Dave Nonis happened.
User avatar
scrub12
AnalLog
Posts: 1958
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 4:56 am

Re: NHL Thread

Post by scrub12 »

My Avs. Holy crap.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: NHL Thread

Post by elliseamos »

philpritchard wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
elliseamos wrote:Yeah, I haven't looked up the details, but I'm thinking it's safe to say Toronto got the worse end of both trades involving Kessel.

And the Tuukka trade is comical.
The second Kessel trade was almost entirely about dumping his long-term salary. They got Kasperi Kapenen (who I think is going to be a really good player) and flipped the first round pick for Frederik Anderson, who has been their first reliable goalie since Belfour. Hell, even the first Kessel trade was more about mis-judging the calibre of the team (and ultimately the quality of the picks) than any issue with trading for Kessel.

I mean... all of this could have been avoided by just not making the first Kessel trade and keeping Rask instead of Pogge and instead building the team around Seguin, Hamilton, and Rask... but trading Kessel was just fine.
Thanks. And don't forget Jared Knight was taken with TOR's 2nd round pick the same year Seguin was #2 overall. Maybe TOR would have picked Justin Faulk or Tyler Toffoli instead of Knight in that round. John Klingberg was pick in the 5th round that year, so every team can kick themselves for not taking him.

Now that I had the chance to look things up and although I'll agree that Anderson & Kapenen is a good haul for Kessel, TOR traded Kessel just before his age 27-32 seasons (he's still so young). And, although he's still costing them $1.2M against the cap, he's still not as big an anchor as Tim Gleason. WTF happened there?
Dave Nonis happened.
:lol:
scrub12 wrote:My Avs. Holy crap.
They live another day!
User avatar
Dev
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7665
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:46 pm

Re: NHL Thread

Post by Dev »

go Avs
AMAB
User avatar
Peeps
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7387
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm

Re: NHL Thread

Post by Peeps »

all those beer cans being thrown and phil is just looking to see if anyone throws a hotdog
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35418
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: NHL Thread

Post by Strat »

Wild just let their GM go. Thank heavens. Sure, i appreciate making it to the playoffs on a regular basis but geezes....enough with the 1st/second round exits.

Super excited for change. he has made so many awful trades and signings.
User avatar
daft twat
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5429
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:23 am
Location: The In Between

Re: NHL Thread

Post by daft twat »

Strat wrote:Wild just let their GM go. Thank heavens. Sure, i appreciate making it to the playoffs on a regular basis but geezes....enough with the 1st/second round exits.

Super excited for change. he has made so many awful trades and signings.
Yeah, but the owner thinks we’re just a tweek away from contending and made it clear he will only hire a gm who feels the same. 6 lame playoff appearances in a row means we need to start over.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: NHL Thread

Post by elliseamos »

Kudos to the leafs and their efforts, but this smells of HOFer Jacobs manufactoring more home games (somehow).
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: NHL Thread

Post by PHATJ »

daft twat wrote:
Strat wrote:Wild just let their GM go. Thank heavens. Sure, i appreciate making it to the playoffs on a regular basis but geezes....enough with the 1st/second round exits.

Super excited for change. he has made so many awful trades and signings.
Yeah, but the owner thinks we’re just a tweek away from contending and made it clear he will only hire a gm who feels the same. 6 lame playoff appearances in a row means we need to start over.
Bleh
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37454
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: NHL Thread

Post by Norah »

Game 7 against the Leafs? I've seen this before.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: NHL Thread

Post by elliseamos »

cutuphalfdead wrote:Game 7 against the Leafs? I've seen this before.
I'd prefer it go easier for the Bs this time around.
MattA75
AnalLog
Posts: 1504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: NHL Thread

Post by MattA75 »

All those icings proved to be a solid strategy for the Leafs...any team that does that in a game 7 should get what Toronto got tonight...especially given the offensive firepower they have
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: NHL Thread

Post by elliseamos »

MattA75 wrote:All those icings proved to be a solid strategy for the Leafs...any team that does that in a game 7 should get what Toronto got tonight...especially given the offensive firepower they have
Yeah, odd strategy, but fun game and series. Bring on the bolts!
User avatar
darth_vedder
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6467
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm

Re: NHL Thread

Post by darth_vedder »

The Capitals better beat the Penguins this year, or I swear to God.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52023
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: NHL Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

darth_vedder wrote:The Capitals better beat the Penguins this year, or I swear to God.
I can't take it. I know they won't but I'll still be stressing over it
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: NHL Thread

Post by philpritchard »

MattA75 wrote:All those icings proved to be a solid strategy for the Leafs...any team that does that in a game 7 should get what Toronto got tonight...especially given the offensive firepower they have
Wait... the Bruins went through a stretch where they iced the puck over and over and over again, too.
MattA75
AnalLog
Posts: 1504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: NHL Thread

Post by MattA75 »

philpritchard wrote:
MattA75 wrote:All those icings proved to be a solid strategy for the Leafs...any team that does that in a game 7 should get what Toronto got tonight...especially given the offensive firepower they have
Wait... the Bruins went through a stretch where they iced the puck over and over and over again, too.
Aside from the final few minutes where the Leafs had pulled their goalie and the Bruins iced it 2 or 3 times (which is an entirely different animal than doing it with a 1 goal lead late in the second/early in the third period), I don't remember the Bruins consistently icing the puck, though the second half of the third period I was much more in and out of the game due to a sick kid, so maybe I just missed it.

I mean, if you're last year's Ottawa team, and you're riding the fluke of all flukes, and you actually suck, I get that strategy...if you're Toronto, and it's a 1 goal game, and you have the sort of offensive talent they do, I can't understand trying to ride it out by icing the puck...I dunno, just expected more out of that team and shocked that Babcock would make that sort of call

I expect the Bruins to get steamrolled by Tampa...Chara is looking old/tired for the first time all year, McAvoy is hurt (and his confidence is dwindling by the game because of how his injury has affected his game), and Rask aside from the one game he stole was shaky all series

In the end, I guess I'm rooting for the Nashville/Winnipeg winner to go all the way, and Saturday I'll be rooting for the Canucks to win the Dahlin sweepstakes
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: NHL Thread

Post by philpritchard »

MattA75 wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
MattA75 wrote:All those icings proved to be a solid strategy for the Leafs...any team that does that in a game 7 should get what Toronto got tonight...especially given the offensive firepower they have
Wait... the Bruins went through a stretch where they iced the puck over and over and over again, too.
Aside from the final few minutes where the Leafs had pulled their goalie and the Bruins iced it 2 or 3 times (which is an entirely different animal than doing it with a 1 goal lead late in the second/early in the third period), I don't remember the Bruins consistently icing the puck, though the second half of the third period I was much more in and out of the game due to a sick kid, so maybe I just missed it.

I mean, if you're last year's Ottawa team, and you're riding the fluke of all flukes, and you actually suck, I get that strategy...if you're Toronto, and it's a 1 goal game, and you have the sort of offensive talent they do, I can't understand trying to ride it out by icing the puck...I dunno, just expected more out of that team and shocked that Babcock would make that sort of call
It wasn't at the end of the game, it was... I want to say in the second period when it was tied/after the Leafs had taken the lead.

I don't think it was a Babcock issue, I think it was a combination of crappy players doing dumb things and good players making mistakes. Other than the third period in Game 6, where they were almost flawless in that respect, getting the puck out of the zone was an issue for the Leafs the entire series. When you struggle to make simple plays to use the boards and get it out and can't hit your teammates with a ten foot pass to open up space, you end up icing the puck out of desperation whether it's intentional or not.
Post Reply