I wonder what the bookmakers will say.Simple Torture wrote:I have long argued that it shouldn't be counted as one, but most setlist trackers do.cutuphalfdead wrote:Is Crazy Mary a cover?Simple Torture wrote:How high would the over/under on covers have to be for you to stay away? If it were 6.5 I would still put action on it.Simple Torture wrote:Parlay that with the over on number of covers played and there's your kids' college funds.Bi_3 wrote:Lukin -> Not for You 3:1cutuphalfdead wrote:It's gonna be great when I can sit at Fenway Park, open up an app, and place a legal prop bet mid game.
The Supreme Court
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37446
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: The Supreme Court
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21685
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: The Supreme Court
Other scenarios:cutuphalfdead wrote:I wonder what the bookmakers will say.Simple Torture wrote:I have long argued that it shouldn't be counted as one, but most setlist trackers do.cutuphalfdead wrote:Is Crazy Mary a cover?Simple Torture wrote:How high would the over/under on covers have to be for you to stay away? If it were 6.5 I would still put action on it.Simple Torture wrote:Parlay that with the over on number of covers played and there's your kids' college funds.Bi_3 wrote:Lukin -> Not for You 3:1cutuphalfdead wrote:It's gonna be great when I can sit at Fenway Park, open up an app, and place a legal prop bet mid game.
Are songs from Ed's solo albums covers? (my take: no)
Are tags covers if it's not the complete song? (no)
Are tags covers if they play the whole song? I.e., The Star Spangled on YL (maybe?)
McParadigm wrote:lol
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37446
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: The Supreme Court
In that case, at 6.5 I'm taking the under.Simple Torture wrote:Other scenarios:cutuphalfdead wrote:I wonder what the bookmakers will say.Simple Torture wrote:I have long argued that it shouldn't be counted as one, but most setlist trackers do.cutuphalfdead wrote:Is Crazy Mary a cover?Simple Torture wrote:How high would the over/under on covers have to be for you to stay away? If it were 6.5 I would still put action on it.Simple Torture wrote:Parlay that with the over on number of covers played and there's your kids' college funds.Bi_3 wrote:Lukin -> Not for You 3:1cutuphalfdead wrote:It's gonna be great when I can sit at Fenway Park, open up an app, and place a legal prop bet mid game.
Are songs from Ed's solo albums covers? (my take: no)
Are tags covers if it's not the complete song? (no)
Are tags covers if they play the whole song? I.e., The Star Spangled on YL (maybe?)
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21685
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: The Supreme Court
Last four stadium shows have included this many cover songs:cutuphalfdead wrote:In that case, at 6.5 I'm taking the under.Simple Torture wrote:Other scenarios:cutuphalfdead wrote:I wonder what the bookmakers will say.Simple Torture wrote:I have long argued that it shouldn't be counted as one, but most setlist trackers do.cutuphalfdead wrote:Is Crazy Mary a cover?Simple Torture wrote:How high would the over/under on covers have to be for you to stay away? If it were 6.5 I would still put action on it.Simple Torture wrote:Parlay that with the over on number of covers played and there's your kids' college funds.Bi_3 wrote:Lukin -> Not for You 3:1cutuphalfdead wrote:It's gonna be great when I can sit at Fenway Park, open up an app, and place a legal prop bet mid game.
Are songs from Ed's solo albums covers? (my take: no)
Are tags covers if it's not the complete song? (no)
Are tags covers if they play the whole song? I.e., The Star Spangled on YL (maybe?)
Wrigley 2 - 7
Wrigley 1 - 7
Boston 2 - 4
Boston 1 - 6
Remind me to make a book for these come the summer time.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
I once went to a show (Missoula 2005) with zero covers. How rare is that?
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28128
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: The Supreme Court
Pretty rare.Green Habit wrote:I once went to a show (Missoula 2005) with zero covers. How rare is that?
- washing machine
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15815
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
- Location: Space City
Re: The Supreme Court
What are the actual odds though?
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
- Biff Pocoroba
- TIER 1 Essential Critical Infrastructure Worker
- Posts: 4801
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:08 pm
- Location: 5th floor, Bay 7, position 5740
Re: The Supreme Court
Never tell me the odds.
Sorry, wrong thread.
Sorry, wrong thread.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40646
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: The Supreme Court
Agreed. Pearl Jam’s version came out first.Simple Torture wrote:I have long argued that it shouldn't be counted as one, but most setlist trackers do.cutuphalfdead wrote:Is Crazy Mary a cover?Simple Torture wrote:How high would the over/under on covers have to be for you to stay away? If it were 6.5 I would still put action on it.Simple Torture wrote:Parlay that with the over on number of covers played and there's your kids' college funds.Bi_3 wrote:Lukin -> Not for You 3:1cutuphalfdead wrote:It's gonna be great when I can sit at Fenway Park, open up an app, and place a legal prop bet mid game.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
- ---
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Ginsburg is almost beyond parody at this point.Green Habit wrote:Masterpiece Cakeshop opinion is out:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/1 ... 1_j4el.pdf
- run2death
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 5223
- Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm
- Location: A Dark Place
Re: The Supreme Court
I'd rather be a devout baker and expert Christian than an expert baker and devout Christian.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
This seems to be what killed the case for the commission. Experts are saying it's thus a narrow ruling, I hope that's the case.


- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Geez. Make a damn decision you p***ies. Does a private business have a right to decline a commercial transaction based on sincerely held religious beliefs? WHY IS THAT SO HARD?!?!?!?Green Habit wrote:This seems to be what killed the case for the commission. Experts are saying it's thus a narrow ruling, I hope that's the case.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
- ---
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
This seems easy.Bi_3 wrote:Geez. Make a damn decision you p***ies. Does a private business have a right to decline a commercial transaction based on sincerely held religious beliefs? WHY IS THAT SO HARD?!?!?!?Green Habit wrote:This seems to be what killed the case for the commission. Experts are saying it's thus a narrow ruling, I hope that's the case.
Failure to acknowledge and protect exactly that right - to refuse to engage in a particular behavior (in this case is situated in a commercial context), regardless of its (a)political or (a)religious motivation - amounts to compelling behavior. This seems like a dangerous precedent to set.
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
We already compel behavior to eliminate (or pretend to eliminate) discrimination against protected classes. I don't think it's that easy.--- wrote:This seems easy.Bi_3 wrote:Geez. Make a damn decision you p***ies. Does a private business have a right to decline a commercial transaction based on sincerely held religious beliefs? WHY IS THAT SO HARD?!?!?!?Green Habit wrote:This seems to be what killed the case for the commission. Experts are saying it's thus a narrow ruling, I hope that's the case.
Failure to acknowledge and protect exactly that right - to refuse to engage in a particular behavior (in this case is situated in a commercial context), regardless of its (a)political or (a)religious motivation - amounts to compelling behavior. This seems like a dangerous precedent to set.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Smart legal scholars are suggesting that today's ruling should make the case against Trump's travel ban even stronger.
http://reason.com/volokh/2018/06/04/how ... ecision-st
https://takecareblog.com/blog/masterpie ... -entry-ban
http://reason.com/volokh/2018/06/04/how ... ecision-st
https://takecareblog.com/blog/masterpie ... -entry-ban
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37446
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: The Supreme Court
Do we know what the cake was supposed to look like? Like, how gay was it?
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29870
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: The Supreme Court
it was the shape of a man's ass shitting out rainbow-colored c*m on the floor of a san francisco bath house
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21685
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: The Supreme Court
So in Obama's America, a 3/10?96583UP wrote:it was the shape of a man's ass shitting out rainbow-colored c*m on the floor of a san francisco bath house
McParadigm wrote:lol