Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

May the force be with you
Post Reply
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by epilogue »

No gonna lie... I appreciated 3P0 & R2 in Rogue One. *shrugs*

And yes, dime, Solo would be better without things like "mining colonies are the worst" and "fair and square."
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4143
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by blueviper »

Let's take Empire for example. It's the sequel to the big blockbuster from 1977 that everyone is excited about.

Did they do any winks or callbacks to ANH? Off the top of my head I can't think of any. Besides Han needing to pay off Jabba the Hutt. That almost feels like a continuation of his smuggler ways that concludes in ROTJ, not fan service.
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by epilogue »

blueviper wrote:Let's take Empire for example. It's the sequel to the big blockbuster from 1977 that everyone is excited about.

Did they do any winks or callbacks to ANH? Off the top of my head I can't think of any. Besides Han needing to pay off Jabba the Hutt. That almost feels like a continuation of his smuggler ways that concludes in ROTJ, not fan service.
I mean... literally all of RotJ is fan service. But, that aside, I don't disagree with you. My point wasn't that all the Star Wars movies have inside baseball moments. Rather, that all the Star Wars movies are hokey and have moments that make us cringe or shake our heads.

We saw, most of us, the OT when we were younger. We're used to those movies and their humor and contrived moments and inconsistencies. Because as kids, we watch with open hearts and wide eyes.

More to your point, are there moments in TLJ that you think are on the nose, or fan service-y? I think TLJ lines up with Empire in what you're saying. Sequel to a huge blockbuster that everyone is excited about and doesn't do that kind of thing. It's still got hokey moments and weird plot holes and things that don't make sense, like all Star Wars movies. But it's not that same on-the-nose thing that Solo has.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

ROTJ is not “fan service.” What are you talking about
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4143
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by blueviper »

durdencommatyler wrote:
blueviper wrote:Let's take Empire for example. It's the sequel to the big blockbuster from 1977 that everyone is excited about.

Did they do any winks or callbacks to ANH? Off the top of my head I can't think of any. Besides Han needing to pay off Jabba the Hutt. That almost feels like a continuation of his smuggler ways that concludes in ROTJ, not fan service.
I mean... literally all of RotJ is fan service. But, that aside, I don't disagree with you. My point wasn't that all the Star Wars movies have inside baseball moments. Rather, that all the Star Wars movies are hokey and have moments that make us cringe or shake our heads.

We saw, most of us, the OT when we were younger. We're used to those movies and their humor and contrived moments and inconsistencies. Because as kids, we watch with open hearts and wide eyes.

More to your point, are there moments in TLJ that you think are on the nose, or fan service-y? I think TLJ lines up with Empire in what you're saying. Sequel to a huge blockbuster that everyone is excited about and doesn't do that kind of thing. It's still got hokey moments and weird plot holes and things that don't make sense, like all Star Wars movies. But it's not that same on-the-nose thing that Solo has.
Yeah, I get what you are saying. When I think about TLJ I don't necessarily see anything in the terms of fan service like we're discussing with Solo. I think I may be thinking of TFA in that regard.

Fan-service is a weird thing. I don't think it necessarily propels a character or storyline forward. It may even keep it stagnant or fall back, just because the writers are falling back on familiar sayings or catchphrases that while they were cool the first time, they don't necessarily resonate in subsequent usages.
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

Nothing in the OT makes me cringe or shake my head. This is a bad take
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4143
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by blueviper »

If you look at ANH as the first movie, and ESB and ROTJ follow, can you name all the fan servicing?

ESB: can't think of any.
ROTJ: the "I love you, I know" switcheroo?
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:ROTJ is not “fan service.” What are you talking about
It's literally a remake of ANH with teddy bears in it. There's another Death Star. Every beat comes from what came before. Bringing Han back is fan service. Harrison wanted out. They bribed him into coming back. Lando was supposed to be the new Han. There's nothing about that movie that isn't done to make fans happy and to make fans feel good.

I'm not saying "fan service" is a negative thing, by the way. There's not a negative connotation as far as I'm concerned. At least, not in this example.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:ROTJ is not “fan service.” What are you talking about
It's literally a remake of ANH with teddy bears in it. There's another Death Star. Every beat comes from what came before. Bringing Han back is fan service. Harrison wanted out. They bribed him into coming back. Lando was supposed to be the new Han. There's nothing about that movie that isn't done to make fans happy and to make fans feel good.

I'm not saying "fan service" is a negative thing, by the way. There's not a negative connotation as far as I'm concerned. At least, not in this example.
No. Sorry. This is completely off the mark.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43421
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by VinylGuy »

Yeah Joe.

Its a very different movie in tone and with lots of new elements.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:ROTJ is not “fan service.” What are you talking about
It's literally a remake of ANH with teddy bears in it. There's another Death Star. Every beat comes from what came before. Bringing Han back is fan service. Harrison wanted out. They bribed him into coming back. Lando was supposed to be the new Han. There's nothing about that movie that isn't done to make fans happy and to make fans feel good.

I'm not saying "fan service" is a negative thing, by the way. There's not a negative connotation as far as I'm concerned. At least, not in this example.
No. Sorry. This is completely off the mark.
No. Sorry. It isn't.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by epilogue »

VinylGuy wrote:Yeah Joe.

Its a very different movie in tone and with lots of new elements.
There's nothing new in the movie except creatures that aren't wookiees because they ran out of money. It's the final chapter of a complete trilogy. Again, I'm not saying it's a bad thing. It's Act III of a continuous story. It's a logical conclusion on the themes set up in Act I. I'm not denying that or complaining about it.

However, I'm not sure how anyone can view a new Death Star as anything but fan service in any aspect of the term.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43421
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by VinylGuy »

Basically every character´s arc is different. The movie tone is different.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by epilogue »

VinylGuy wrote:Basically every character´s arc is different. The movie tone is different.
I will grant you that the film as a different tone. Of course it does. And the arc's aren't different, they're just the end of what was begun elsewhere. Again, I'm not saying that RotJ is a bad movie or that the way it approached being the final chapter of a trilogy was off the mark. It was fan service in the best possible sense.

And looking at many fans who hated what Rian did with Luke in TLJ (#notmylukeskywalker) sure seems to support my point. Fans got the movie, the ending that they wanted. hat's fan service.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43421
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by VinylGuy »

durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:Basically every character´s arc is different. The movie tone is different.
I will grant you that the film as a different tone. Of course it does. And the arc's aren't different, they're just the end of what was begun elsewhere. Again, I'm not saying that RotJ is a bad movie or that the way it approached being the final chapter of a trilogy was off the mark. It was fan service in the best possible sense.
but whats the fan service? The death star? I would say its lazy but not fan service.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by epilogue »

VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:Basically every character´s arc is different. The movie tone is different.
I will grant you that the film as a different tone. Of course it does. And the arc's aren't different, they're just the end of what was begun elsewhere. Again, I'm not saying that RotJ is a bad movie or that the way it approached being the final chapter of a trilogy was off the mark. It was fan service in the best possible sense.
but whats the fan service? The death star? I would say its lazy but not fan service.
The whole thing is giving the fans what they want to see. Han and Leia. Luke as a Jedi Master with little to no explanation. Action set pieces that largely don't make sense. Teddy bears (I feel like you of all people, with your Lucasfilm only cares about marketing rhetoric would understand the fan service of Ewoks). The Death Star. The heroes victory. Lando in the Falcon just like Han in ANH. The reversal of the "I love you" "I know" dialogue. It was all in service of the fans and the fans expectations. Do I personally think a lot of it is lazy as hell? Sure, I do. But beyond my own personal feelings, the movie is clearly designed and packaged for maximum impact. There are no risks. Doesn't mean it isn't a beautiful or effective film.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43421
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by VinylGuy »

I would say the Ewoks are a very poor attempt to sell more toys. Pretty much everything this franchise does is with that in mind for sure.
The low points of Jedi are lazy writing, but i wouldnt call it fan service...for me, fan service is C3PO in Rogue One for example.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

The ewoks are maybe my favorite thing in all SW
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43421
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by VinylGuy »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:The ewoks are maybe my favorite thing in all SW
Ha.

Thats so weird man. So weird. Its like that dude that says Batman & Robins is the best mo...oh its you.

Makes sense then.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:The ewoks are maybe my favorite thing in all SW
I have absolutely zero beef with Ewoks. Just so we're clear.
Post Reply