The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29871
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

Simple Torture wrote:
96583UP wrote:it was the shape of a man's ass shitting out rainbow-colored c*m on the floor of a san francisco bath house
So in Obama's America, a 3/10?
only because it was a registered republican ass
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

Get ready to pay sales tax on more online purchases.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/1 ... 4_j4el.pdf
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

Green Habit wrote:Get ready to pay sales tax on more online purchases.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/1 ... 4_j4el.pdf

What’s your take on the gerrymandering decision?
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25034
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Well. Fuck.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

Partyline vote gives the travel ban a Supreme Court victory.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25034
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Well. Fuck.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

McParadigm wrote:Partyline vote gives the travel ban a Supreme Court victory.
Kennedy's concurrence is a real WTF.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

Bi_3 wrote:
Green Habit wrote:Get ready to pay sales tax on more online purchases.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/1 ... 4_j4el.pdf
What’s your take on the gerrymandering decision?
Disappointing. Between this and the travel ban case Kennedy's really being cowardly to end this term.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37446
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Norah »

So what's next, ban on immigration from central America?
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by digster »

digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by digster »

Although that doesn't really seem like someone who would want to retire with Trump choosing his replacement.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

digster wrote:Although that doesn't really seem like someone who would want to retire with Trump choosing his replacement.
Several others have been speculating that. Reasonable guess, but only Kennedy himself knows.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by digster »

Also, there is zero mechanism for Democrats to pull a Garland until 2020, correct? If they win the House (which seems more likely) but don't win the Senate (which seems more likely), Democrats will still be out in the cold until Trump is voted out or they turn the Senate two years later. The House isn't involved in Supreme Court nominations at all, correct?
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

digster wrote:Also, there is zero mechanism for Democrats to pull a Garland until 2020, correct? If they win the House (which seems more likely) but don't win the Senate (which seems more likely), Democrats will still be out in the cold until Trump is voted out or they turn the Senate two years later. The House isn't involved in Supreme Court nominations at all, correct?
Correct.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29871
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

Judd Apatow: The Supreme Court are Nazis
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

I can think of a few of you that may :thumbsup: this, but this gets a huge :thumbsdown: from me.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/1 ... 6_2b3j.pdf
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25034
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Green Habit wrote:I can think of a few of you that may :thumbsup: this, but this gets a huge :thumbsdown: from me.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/1 ... 6_2b3j.pdf
I'm fine with it, as long as people who refuse to pay the dues are stripped of any pay raises negotiated by the union, overtime pay, health insurance, holiday leave, and grievance procedures.

Unions have been giving workers benefits for so long, people don't see how much better off they are b/c of them.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
---
Future Drummer
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by --- »

User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by @SkitchP »

B wrote:
Green Habit wrote:I can think of a few of you that may :thumbsup: this, but this gets a huge :thumbsdown: from me.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/1 ... 6_2b3j.pdf
I'm fine with it, as long as people who refuse to pay the dues are stripped of any pay raises negotiated by the union, overtime pay, health insurance, holiday leave, and grievance procedures.

Unions have been giving workers benefits for so long, people don't see how much better off they are b/c of them.

That would backfire immediately. All the employer would have to do is give disproportionate raises and leave to the people who opt out and then the union likely goes away entirely.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

@SkitchP wrote:
B wrote:
Green Habit wrote:I can think of a few of you that may :thumbsup: this, but this gets a huge :thumbsdown: from me.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/1 ... 6_2b3j.pdf
I'm fine with it, as long as people who refuse to pay the dues are stripped of any pay raises negotiated by the union, overtime pay, health insurance, holiday leave, and grievance procedures.

Unions have been giving workers benefits for so long, people don't see how much better off they are b/c of them.
That would backfire immediately. All the employer would have to do is give disproportionate raises and leave to the people who opt out and then the union likely goes away entirely.
Bingo.
Post Reply