Lightning Bolt: the official album thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Rank Lightning Bolt

5 stars
1
1%
4 stars
4
5%
3 stars
29
37%
2 stars
30
38%
1 star
14
18%
 
Total votes: 78

User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by McParadigm »

Wow.

They sure suck at David Tennant and Bill Murray, though.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by stip »

digster wrote:I think if two of the three songs we heard hadn't fallen relatively flat here, there might be more excitement about it. People who may not be fans of the new material are probably feeling like they'd wait and see, rather than go all in on the new record.
no doubt.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by dimejinky99 »

Are PJ songs not usually better live? Or is it vice versa?

It's been a while since I've listened
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85161
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by epilogue »

dimejinky99 wrote:Are PJ songs not usually better live? Or is it vice versa?

It's been a while since I've listened
I prefer studio, typically.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

durdencommatyler wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:Are PJ songs not usually better live? Or is it vice versa?

It's been a while since I've listened
I prefer studio, typically.
Same for me, but live versions used to be a lot closer
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Thejambi »

Is there a better capture of LB & FD apart from videogremmie on youtube?
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

Thejambi wrote:Is there a better capture of LB & FD apart from videogremmie on youtube?
Those are the best I've come across, but I've also tried not to listen too much so i haven't hunted for anything better
User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

It's funny how people seem to think that "Future Days" will magically become a better song once a better recording is available.
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Thejambi »

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:It's funny how people seem to think that "Future Days" will magically become a better song once a better recording is available.
I think it will be more enjoyable .
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85161
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by epilogue »

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:It's funny how people seem to think that "Future Days" will magically become a better song once a better recording is available.
It depends on how different the arrangement is. Maybe not at all. But maybe it's more than just Ed and a guitar or whatever on the album. I'm not saying it'll magically become better, but there could be a lot more to like about a studio version, depending on what they've done with it.

But maybe it'll be the exact same thing, just compressed.
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Coach »

durdencommatyler wrote:
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:It's funny how people seem to think that "Future Days" will magically become a better song once a better recording is available.
It depends on how different the arrangement is. Maybe not at all. But maybe it's more than just Ed and a guitar or whatever on the album. I'm not saying it'll magically become better, but there could be a lot more to like about a studio version, depending on what they've done with it.

But maybe it'll be the exact same thing, just compressed.
I think a proper studio recording could bump this up by .5 a star, especially if they add a real piano to it, and maybe let Mike or Stone chime in with some nifty guitar sounds.
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Coach »

This might be unpopular here, but if I was BoB for a day and was allowed to eliminate either Lightning Bolt or Future Days from the new record, I'd strike LB.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85161
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by epilogue »

Coach wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:It's funny how people seem to think that "Future Days" will magically become a better song once a better recording is available.
It depends on how different the arrangement is. Maybe not at all. But maybe it's more than just Ed and a guitar or whatever on the album. I'm not saying it'll magically become better, but there could be a lot more to like about a studio version, depending on what they've done with it.

But maybe it'll be the exact same thing, just compressed.
I think a proper studio recording could bump this up by .5 a star, especially if they add a real piano to it, and maybe let Mike or Stone chime in with some nifty guitar sounds.
Exactly. Or maybe there's a brass section or something. Or if the lyrics are slightly different. I don't know. I'm just saying I think it's possible for the studio version to improve opinions about the song.
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Thejambi »

Coach wrote:This might be unpopular here, but if I was BoB for a day and was allowed to eliminate either Lightning Bolt or Future Days from the new record, I'd strike LB.
This almost makes me want to agree with you.
Last edited by Thejambi on Fri August 09, 2013 3:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85161
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by epilogue »

Coach wrote:This might be unpopular here, but if I was BoB for a day and was allowed to eliminate either Lightning Bolt or Future Days from the new record, I'd strike LB.
I'd need to hear the whole album before I could make a call like that. So much of it will be context, I think.
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Coach »

Thejambi wrote:
Coach wrote:This might be unpopular here, but if I was BoB for a day and was allowed to eliminate either Lightning Bolt or Future Days from the new record, I'd strike LB.
This almost makes me want to agree with you.
Oh man, I didn't even mean to do that. :D
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

I know im in the minority, but i think future days is good, not overly exciting, but its a good song, and im sure they could add some touches to the studio version to bump it up a bit like coach said, but if you totally hate the live version then you most likely won't like the studio version either
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Coach »

durdencommatyler wrote:
Coach wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:It's funny how people seem to think that "Future Days" will magically become a better song once a better recording is available.
It depends on how different the arrangement is. Maybe not at all. But maybe it's more than just Ed and a guitar or whatever on the album. I'm not saying it'll magically become better, but there could be a lot more to like about a studio version, depending on what they've done with it.

But maybe it'll be the exact same thing, just compressed.
I think a proper studio recording could bump this up by .5 a star, especially if they add a real piano to it, and maybe let Mike or Stone chime in with some nifty guitar sounds.
Exactly. Or maybe there's a brass section or something. Or if the lyrics are slightly different. I don't know. I'm just saying I think it's possible for the studio version to improve opinions about the song.
If they had the clapping to Future Days, then I take back what I wrote!
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Coach »

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:I know im in the minority, but i think future days is good, not overly exciting, but its a good song, and im sure they could add some touches to the studio version to bump it up a bit like coach said, but if you totally hate the live version then you most likely won't like the studio version either
I agree with you. I like Future Days. My fear is that like most recent Ed solo songs, I will grow tired of it. Still, I have been humming it over the last few weeks.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

Coach wrote:
Thejambi wrote:
Coach wrote:This might be unpopular here, but if I was BoB for a day and was allowed to eliminate either Lightning Bolt or Future Days from the new record, I'd strike LB.
This almost makes me want to agree with you.
Oh man, I didn't even mean to do that. :D
That makes it even better
Post Reply