The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

THE PICK HAS BEEN LEAKED!
Spoiler: show
Image
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46229
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

Please be Barron Trump please be Barron Trump...
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

IT'S A WHITE GUY HE MUST BE EVIL
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21687
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Simple Torture »

96583UP wrote:oh shit his intro music is also metamorphosis
1. Of The Girl's Right To Choose
2. Do The Evolution Must Be Taught Alongside Creationism In Schools
3. Jeremy Vs. Board of Education
4. W.M.A.s Can Also Be Discriminated Against

And then the Periscope feed cut out.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

<insert right-wing stereotype here>
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46229
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

A literal swamp monster.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

Wow the guy who thinks it shouldn’t be possible to investigate presidents no way
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

bow to your owner
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25045
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

So, how bad is this guy?
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

Hmmmm, let's see:

1. He is not a trans
2. He is not a woman
3. He is not gay
4. He is not black

SO HE'S OBVIOUSLY NOT QUALIFIED
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25045
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

96583UP wrote:Hmmmm, let's see:

1. He is not a trans
2. He is not a woman
3. He is not gay
4. He is not black

SO HE'S OBVIOUSLY NOT QUALIFIED
He doesn't have to BE those things as long as he doesn't shit on gay, trans, black women.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by elliseamos »

McParadigm wrote:Wow the guy who thinks it shouldn’t be possible to investigate presidents no way
Yet made his name/career writing the Starr report?
User avatar
Jammer XCI
Future Drummer
Posts: 3251
Joined: Sun May 31, 2015 12:11 am
Location: The 216
Contact:

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Jammer XCI »

96583UP wrote:Hmmmm, let's see:

1. He is not a trans
2. He is not a woman
3. He is not gay
4. He is not black

SO HE'S OBVIOUSLY NOT QUALIFIED
Shut up, the adults are talking now.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46229
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

Shocking upset!

Image
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16296
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Birds in Hell »

BurtReynolds wrote:Shocking upset!

Image
:hooray:
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

Green Habit wrote:
Yeetus that fetus!
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

Any thoughts from our resident Court followers about the fact that this future Supreme Court Justice introduced himself to the public with a blatant lie whose only purpose was to sycophantically flatter the president’s ego?

Coming out of the gate with a propaganda-level falsehood on your way to the highest court in the land seems....not great?
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
---
Future Drummer
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by --- »

McParadigm wrote:Any thoughts from our resident Court followers about the fact that this future Supreme Court Justice introduced himself to the public with a blatant lie whose only purpose was to sycophantically flatter the president’s ego?

Coming out of the gate with a propaganda-level falsehood on your way to the highest court in the land seems....not great?
Maybe it's just me, but the 300+ opinions he authored during his fifteen years on the appeals court seem more likely to be instructive about what to expect than anything uttered during an introductory exercise whose whole point is to flatter and wheedle and deliver exactly nothing of substance.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

--- wrote:
McParadigm wrote:Any thoughts from our resident Court followers about the fact that this future Supreme Court Justice introduced himself to the public with a blatant lie whose only purpose was to sycophantically flatter the president’s ego?

Coming out of the gate with a propaganda-level falsehood on your way to the highest court in the land seems....not great?
Maybe it's just me, but the 300+ opinions he authored during his fifteen years on the appeals court seem more likely to be instructive about what to expect than anything uttered during an introductory exercise whose whole point is to flatter and wheedle and deliver exactly nothing of substance.
Maybe it’s just me, but they aren’t mutually exclusive, it is a revealing behavior, and we don’t have limited space to discuss.
(patriotic choking noises)
Post Reply