RANK THE ALBUMS

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by Monkey_Driven »

liebzz wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
chewm wrote:S/T is good.
It is, yes.
I think S/T is an excellent album. I even enjoy Big Wave which I know is derided around here. I generally agree that the production wasn’t great but I enjoyed the songs. I also enjoy the studio version of Gone *gasp*.
I don't think Big Wave has that bad of a reputation. It's one of their better rocking "fun" songs.
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by PHATJ »

Monkey_Driven wrote:
liebzz wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
chewm wrote:S/T is good.
It is, yes.
I think S/T is an excellent album. I even enjoy Big Wave which I know is derided around here. I generally agree that the production wasn’t great but I enjoyed the songs. I also enjoy the studio version of Gone *gasp*.
I don't think Big Wave has that bad of a reputation. It's one of their better rocking "fun" songs.
I like Big Wave well enough. Gone too.
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10612
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by liebzz »

PHATJ wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
liebzz wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
chewm wrote:S/T is good.
It is, yes.
I think S/T is an excellent album. I even enjoy Big Wave which I know is derided around here. I generally agree that the production wasn’t great but I enjoyed the songs. I also enjoy the studio version of Gone *gasp*.
I don't think Big Wave has that bad of a reputation. It's one of their better rocking "fun" songs.
I like Big Wave well enough. Gone too.
Let the proper appreciation for the avocado album begin!!
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16296
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by Birds in Hell »

You all know how I feel about Big Wave.

:bammer:
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10612
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by liebzz »

I always thought of s/t as a reaction to Riot Act in Sound much the way Yield was a sort of reaction to No Code. Both No Code and Riot Act played around with sounds and textures. No Code is full of abstract contemplation and Riot Act is very dark sounding. Both Yield and s/t are sort of clean sounding rock records. They have their explorations here and there, and covers some of the same themes, but what defines those albums are the more straightforward Pearl Jam sounding songs. And while I personally prefer No Code and Yield, I also think both Riot Act and s/t are very strong albums in this similar vein.

Also, the run from Life Wasted through Marker in the Sand is just excellent hard rock.
Tuolumne
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 770
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 10:13 pm

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by Tuolumne »

Big Wave is awesome. It is a teaser for the Backspacer awesomeness that I would love later. The most Backspacer-y song on the album and a good representation of where they were about to go.

It's bouncy, concise, rockin, simple, and streamlined. It's one of those songs where I imagine they worked their butts off - not in a "let's add on more stuff" but working hard to skim all of the fat out and peeling away all excesses and stripping songs down to bare essentials. Their version of less is more.
Tuolumne
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 770
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 10:13 pm

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by Tuolumne »

durdencommatyler wrote:Hot Take: Pearl Jam has no bad albums.
Yep. Consistent batting average band. Like Tom Petty. Not a string of all-time singular great album followed by a bunch of junk, but a band where they always comes through with something worthwhile enough to sink your teeth into. That is the great benefit of having 5 songwriters in a band. It doesn't all fall on one person. The downside is it's hard to get that singular masterpiece coming from one person's unique vision - like a Pete Townshend or Cobain or Reznor or something.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37454
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by Norah »

oh honey
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85154
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by epilogue »

Tuolumne wrote:Not a string of all-time singular great album
wait, what?
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by Monkey_Driven »

I listened to Backspacer front to back last night with the windows rolled down. It's fun!
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10612
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by liebzz »

This doesn’t sound like the RM I’ve known and loved where the routine is to crap on all releases post Riot Act...
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by PHATJ »

I’ve got a crap
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16296
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by Birds in Hell »

Tuolumne wrote:Big Wave is awesome. It is a teaser for the Backspacer awesomeness that I would love later. The most Backspacer-y song on the album and a good representation of where they were about to go.

It's bouncy, concise, rockin, simple, and streamlined. It's one of those songs where I imagine they worked their butts off - not in a "let's add on more stuff" but working hard to skim all of the fat out and peeling away all excesses and stripping songs down to bare essentials. Their version of less is more.
This doesn’t ring true for me at all. There’s a lot more going on in Big Wave than is being acknowledged here, it’s musically quite complex. If anything, Backspacer seems like a repudiation of the kind of compositional nuance that's all over S/T, especially a song like Big Wave with its weird twists and turns.
Last edited by Birds in Hell on Wed July 11, 2018 10:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35418
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by Strat »

Birds in Hell wrote:
Tuolumne wrote:Big Wave is awesome. It is a teaser for the Backspacer awesomeness that I would love later. The most Backspacer-y song on the album and a good representation of where they were about to go.

It's bouncy, concise, rockin, simple, and streamlined. It's one of those songs where I imagine they worked their butts off - not in a "let's add on more stuff" but working hard to skim all of the fat out and peeling away all excesses and stripping songs down to bare essentials. Their version of less is more.
This doesn’t ring true for me at all. There’s a lot more going on in Big Wave than this acknowledges, it’s musically quite complex. Backspacer seems like a repudiation of this kind of material, if anything.
Musically speaking, other than than the matt cameron songs - yes.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36758
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by Jorge »

Birds in Hell wrote:it’s musically quite complex.
This is extremely generous
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16296
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by Birds in Hell »

theplatypus wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:it’s musically quite complex.
This is extremely generous
Well, this is contextual. It's pretty complex for Pearl Jam.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85154
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by epilogue »

IN ORDER OF REPLAY FREQUENCY:

1. Riot Act
2. Yeild
3. No Code
4. Vitalogy
5. Ten
6. VS
7. Binaural
8. Lightning Bolt
9. S/T
10. Backspacer
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29884
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by 96583UP »

IN ORDER OF VALUE TO ART AND SCIENCE:

1. BACKSPACER
2. LIGHTNING BOLT
3. THE MARRIAGE OF FIGARO
4. S/T
5. HAMMERKLAVIER
6. 2018 ANNUAL SINGLE
7. AVE MARIA
8. BASMATI BLUES SOUNDTRACK
9. NOCTURNES
10. BARACK AROUND THE CLOCK
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22296
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by bodysnatcher »

i can't believe we've spent 76 pages ranking these albums
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: RANK THE ALBUMS

Post by Monkey_Driven »

bodysnatcher wrote:i can't believe we've spent 76 pages ranking these albums

Never underestimate the internet.
Post Reply