Walmart is a fucking homo

[dkfan9]

I don't know anything about their employee relations

[NaiveAndTrue]

I don't know anything about their employee relations

The cashiers are given stools, which while small, is pretty awesome, and even would allow for someone unable to stand for 4+ hour shift the ability to do the job. We have a few Aldi's here. We don't shop regularly but will if it's a 'tight week', and I usually go there first for baking basics (flour, sugar, etc) at Christmas time.

[vegman]

One thing about living in Buffalo that I love is the variety of places to shop. We split our shopping beyween Bjs, Aldis, Wegmans, our local co-op and farmers markets. We also have a Trader Joes opening outside the city soon. I never shop at WalMart and still feel like I get the best I can for my money by being really picky about what I buy in each store.

[Green Habit]

One thing about living in Buffalo that I love is the variety of places to shop. We split our shopping beyween Bjs, Aldis, Wegmans, our local co-op and farmers markets. We also have a Trader Joes opening outside the city soon. I never shop at WalMart and still feel like I get the best I can for my money by being really picky about what I buy in each store.

I would say the same about Boise. Lots of choices between Albertson's, WinCo, Fred Meyer, and our local co-op and farmers markets. Even better is how evenly distributed the stores are across the metro area. I remember illustrating once (to B, I think) on how Boise really doesn't have the problem of food deserts.

[vegman]

One thing about living in Buffalo that I love is the variety of places to shop. We split our shopping beyween Bjs, Aldis, Wegmans, our local co-op and farmers markets. We also have a Trader Joes opening outside the city soon. I never shop at WalMart and still feel like I get the best I can for my money by being really picky about what I buy in each store.

I would say the same about Boise. Lots of choices between Albertson's, WinCo, Fred Meyer, and our local co-op and farmers markets. Even better is how evenly distributed the stores are across the metro area. I remember illustrating once (to B, I think) on how Boise really doesn't have the problem of food deserts.

Unfortunately, Buffalo does. Its improving, thanks in part to Aldis, but the East side is pretty bodega dependent.

[bada]

We have an ALDI in my town my wife loves it. You are basically buying generic. Instead of Cheerios you get Crispy Oats in the same box design. It's good for kids meals. They don't care. We belong to BJ's too. It's worth it just for the price of milk.

[Man in Black]

Some Boise pride has inspired me to bring back one of RM's all time great thread titles.

http://business.time.com/2013/08/07/mee ... nightmare/

Retail
Meet the Low-Key, Low-Cost Grocery Chain Being Called ‘Walmart’s Worst Nightmare’
By Brad Tuttle @bradrtuttle
Aug. 07, 2013

Retail analysts say that the world’s biggest retailer has reason to fear a small grocery chain that’s based in Idaho and boasts a business model that allows it to undercut Walmart on prices.

So about that eye-catching Walmart quote. Those are the words of Burt Flickinger III, a widely respected supermarket retailing industry expert who works for the Strategic Resource Group. Flickinger was quoted in a recent Idaho Statesman story about WinCo, a chain of roughly 100 supermarkets in the western U.S., based in Boise.

“WinCo arguably may be the best retailer in the Western U.S.,” Flickinger says while touring a WinCo store. “WinCo is really unstoppable at this point,” he goes on. “They’re Walmart’s worst nightmare.”

Flickinger isn’t the only industry insider discussing WinCo and Walmart in the same breath. “While many supermarkets strive to keep within a few percentage points of Walmart Stores’ prices, WinCo Foods often undersells the massive discount chain,” the industry publication Supermarket News explained last spring.

How does WinCo manage to undercut Walmart on prices? And why should the world’s largest retailer have any reason to fear a small regional grocer chain that most Americans have never heard of?

First off, the reason you probably haven’t heard of WinCo is partly because at this point its stores are limited to a handful of states in the West. But WinCo is a little-known player also because the company is a privately held enterprise that seems to take its privacy seriously, preferring a low-key, low-profile approach—which is extremely rare in a world of retailers boisterously begging for shoppers’ attention.

Simply put, WinCo “communicates low prices by delivering low prices,” Jon Hauptman, a partner at Willard Bishop, a retail consulting firm, told Supermarket News. “WinCo doesn’t do much to communicate price and value. It convinces shoppers of value based on the shopping experience, rather than relying on smoke and mirrors to convince them.”

As for how WinCo can deliver such low prices, the Statesman story details the company’s history and business model. It all began, interestingly enough, when two Idaho businessmen opened a warehouse-type discount store with a name that could have been pulled from a movie slyly spoofing Walmart. Waremart, it was called. The company became employee-owned in 1985, and changed its name to WinCo (short for “Winning Company”) in 1999.

Prices are kept low through a variety of strategies, the main one being that it often cuts out distributors and other middle men and buys many goods directly from farms and factories. WinCo also trims costs by not accepting credit cards and by asking customers to bag their own groceries. Similarly to warehouse membership stores like Sam’s Club and Costco, and also to successful discount grocers with small stores like Trader Joe’s and Aldi, WinCo stores are organized and minimalist, without many frills, and without the tremendous variety of merchandise that’s become standard at most supermarkets. “Everything is neat and clean, but basic,” Hauptman told Supermarket News. “Though the stores are very large, with a lot of categories, they lack depth or breadth of variety.”

While all of these factors help WinCo compete with Walmart on price, what really might scare the world’s largest retailer is how WinCo treats its employees. In sharp contrast to Walmart, which regularly comes under fire for practices like understaffing stores to keep costs down and hiring tons of temporary workers as a means to avoid paying full-time worker benefits, WinCo has a reputation for doing right by employees. It provides health benefits to all staffers who work at least 24 hours per week. The company also has a pension, with employees getting an amount equal to 20% of their annual salary put in a plan that’s paid for by WinCo; a company spokesperson told the Idaho Statesman that more than 400 nonexecutive workers (cashiers, produce clerks, and such) currently have pensions worth over $1 million apiece.

Generally speaking, shoppers tolerate Walmart’s empty shelves and subpar customer service because the prices are so good. The fact that another retailer—even a small regional one—is able to compete and sometimes beat Walmart on prices, while also operating well-organized stores staffed by workers who enjoy their jobs, like their employer, and genuinely want the company to be successful? Well, that’s got to alarm the world’s biggest retailer, if not keep executives up at night.

While WinCo does keep its business quiet, we do know one thing: The company is in the process of expanding to new states, with two locations opening in north Texas next year, for example. Flickinger anticipates rapid growth in the near future, with WinCo doubling in size every five to seven years going forward.

This is a good company, no doubt about it, this article misses one key reason for their success: Expand, but don't over-expand.

WinCo looks for sites that will yield stores that produce million a week sales, which is a huge number for grocery only retail. Industry average is probably 300,000 to 400,000 a week. Profitability is ensured before the ground is even leveled. That being said, I'm kind of doubting the the growth projected in this article. In 2012, for instance, they opened 4 new stores.

Also, don't kid yourself, their wage scale is only slightly better than Wal-Mart's. Some would say the pension plan makes the difference; if you don't plan on staying long term it's kind of irrelevant.

[stip]

the existence of a pension plan is remarkable, however, and suggests an interest in conceptualizing the employee as a stakeholder.

[mookie]

I love this thread title.

[Green Habit]

that's a nice story. It's amazing how much better you can treat your employees when you aren't answerable to shareholders.

I, too, feel conflicted about that concept. I'll try to see if I can find another story years ago on how Costco was getting harassed by stockbrokers for giving "too much" revenue to its employees and "not enough" to its shareholders. That could fit in well with our discussion about force in the other thread.

I also felt distressed when I read that Facebook essentially had to go public because of rules that the SEC has in place once a firm exceeds a certain number of private shareholders.

I'm not sure if I (or you?) agree with the lede, but this was an interesting read about the decline of the publicly traded company:

http://www.bus.umich.edu/NewsRoom/Artic ... s_id=25862

[nyquillyn]

Not a fan of this thread title.

[Green Habit]

I love this thread title.

Not a fan of this thread title.

Here's a clear RM generation gap.

[nyquillyn]

I love this thread title.

Not a fan of this thread title.

Here's a clear RM generation gap.

px and I are about the same age.

[stip]

that's a nice story. It's amazing how much better you can treat your employees when you aren't answerable to shareholders.

I, too, feel conflicted about that concept. I'll try to see if I can find another story years ago on how Costco was getting harassed by stockbrokers for giving "too much" revenue to its employees and "not enough" to its shareholders. That could fit in well with our discussion about force in the other thread.

I also felt distressed when I read that Facebook essentially had to go public because of rules that the SEC has in place once a firm exceeds a certain number of private shareholders.

I'm not sure if I (or you?) agree with the lede, but this was an interesting read about the decline of the publicly traded company:

http://www.bus.umich.edu/NewsRoom/Artic ... s_id=25862

i agree with the argument given the way he is defining what a publically traded company is, although that seems like a narrow definition. His point about shareholders being the only stakeholders being a big problem I am in complete agreement with

[verb_to_trust]

Aldi's has really good salsa, among other things. I wish there was an iphone app or something to keep track of how much money I save by shopping there as compared to a big chain.

[stip]

the occupy point at the start was silly

[Green Habit]

that's a nice story. It's amazing how much better you can treat your employees when you aren't answerable to shareholders.

I, too, feel conflicted about that concept. I'll try to see if I can find another story years ago on how Costco was getting harassed by stockbrokers for giving "too much" revenue to its employees and "not enough" to its shareholders. That could fit in well with our discussion about force in the other thread.

I also felt distressed when I read that Facebook essentially had to go public because of rules that the SEC has in place once a firm exceeds a certain number of private shareholders.

I'm not sure if I (or you?) agree with the lede, but this was an interesting read about the decline of the publicly traded company:

http://www.bus.umich.edu/NewsRoom/Artic ... s_id=25862

i agree with the argument given the way he is defining what a publically traded company is, although that seems like a narrow definition. His point about shareholders being the only stakeholders being a big problem I am in complete agreement with

You know, I reread the article, and while I thought it would be the second paragraph where we might disagree with him, if he's defining "traditional" as "pre-1980", then I may retract that statement.

Regardless, I think it's fascinating that in only 15 years the number of publicly traded companies has been more than halved.

[stip]

that was news to me as well.

[mookie]

I love this thread title.

Not a fan of this thread title.

Here's a clear RM generation gap.

px and I are about the same age.

It was a lazy and mindlessly cynical comment laced with dripping sarcasm. I'm sorry if it offended anyone because I hadn't noted the sarcasm. It just struck me as something Jeselnik would say.

I'm still trying to figure Walmart out, even though I certainly wouldn't run my business the way they do. Put very simply, I think Walmart is just too big anymore.

[Self]

I love this thread title.

Not a fan of this thread title.

Here's a clear RM generation gap.

px and I are about the same age.

Here's a clear RM generation gap.