The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

Bi_3 wrote:
4/5 wrote:This snub will probably play better for Democrats than anything in his papers would.
What do you think would have happened if he did it?
Jake Tapper would devote 5 tweets and a quarter of his show to what a great moment it was for revealing the humanity behind all the political madness
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37453
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Norah »

Bi_3 wrote:
4/5 wrote:This snub will probably play better for Democrats than anything in his papers would.
What do you think would have happened if he did it?
He'd look like a decent man.
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
4/5 wrote:This snub will probably play better for Democrats than anything in his papers would.
What do you think would have happened if he did it?
He'd look like a decent man.
You get this was a setup, right?
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

4/5 wrote:This snub will probably play better for Democrats than anything in his papers would.
It should. Given the political efforts undertaken by the families and survivors, this crass rejection of basic kindness was a naked statement of fealty to the president. His refusal to shake hands was for an audience of one.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

Bi_3 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
4/5 wrote:This snub will probably play better for Democrats than anything in his papers would.
What do you think would have happened if he did it?
He'd look like a decent man.
You get this was a setup, right?
You saw the hand buzzer too didn’t you?
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
---
Future Drummer
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by --- »

outrage is manufacturing
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

--- wrote:outrage is manufacturing
Exactly

Shakes Hand: gives activist opportunity to attack, embarrass, berate, and attempt to extract political points from him in a meeting beset by protests and screaming.

No Shake: Confirms heartlessness of red team and shows his lack of empathy
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 4/5 »

Is there a chance he had no idea who this guy was, or is this something that he would have definitely known?
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by @SkitchP »

Bi_3 wrote:
--- wrote:outrage is manufacturing
Exactly

Shakes Hand: gives activist opportunity to attack, embarrass, berate, and attempt to extract political points from him in a meeting beset by protests and screaming.

No Shake: Confirms heartlessness of red team and shows his lack of empathy

Why... would shaking his hand be bad at all? I don't get it. Whether he knew who it was or not?
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

4/5 wrote:Is there a chance he had no idea who this guy was, or is this something that he would have definitely known?
He introduced himself and explained that his daughter was killed in the shooting. It was at that point that Kavanugh turned and walked away.
Shakes Hand: gives activist opportunity to attack, embarrass, berate, and attempt to extract political points from him in a meeting beset by protests and screaming
What
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Orpheus
Future Drummer
Posts: 2874
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:08 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Orpheus »

Y'all will bend over backwards to avoid calling these cowards and crooks what they really are. Unbelievable.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37453
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Norah »

Orpheus wrote:Y'all will bend over backwards to avoid calling these cowards and crooks what they really are. Unbelievable.
For real.
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

@SkitchP wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
--- wrote:outrage is manufacturing
Exactly

Shakes Hand: gives activist opportunity to attack, embarrass, berate, and attempt to extract political points from him in a meeting beset by protests and screaming.

No Shake: Confirms heartlessness of red team and shows his lack of empathy

Why... would shaking his hand be bad at all? I don't get it. Whether he knew who it was or not?
Because he has no idea what the person is about to say or do and it was already a threatening situation with multiple activists having been forcibly removed by cops. The ground rules are simple: don’t engage or you risk escalation.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37453
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Norah »

guys, we're talking about shaking a man's hand
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 8:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Orpheus
Future Drummer
Posts: 2874
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:08 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Orpheus »

cutuphalfdead wrote:guys, we're talking about shaking a man's hand
No, no Chud, these are grown men beholden to very important and sacred special interests. Showing basic common decency and human behavior is far beneath them.
User avatar
---
Future Drummer
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by --- »

Orpheus wrote:Y'all will bend over backwards to avoid calling these cowards and crooks what they really are. Unbelievable.
And y'all will bend over backwards to avoid keeping your eye on the ball and according these distractions exactly as much attention as they're worth: zero.

It really would be something if this hearing could be used as an opportunity to discuss constitutional philosophy or judicial interpretation or the consequences of federalism's erosion on the tension between democracy and the judiciary or any number of ideas worth spending time and energy on.

But no. Cheap political theater is enough.
User avatar
Orpheus
Future Drummer
Posts: 2874
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:08 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Orpheus »

I am one of the few Americans acually watching the hearing. I have the mental capacity to "keep my eye on the ball" and recognize that these men are also the modern scum of the Earth.
User avatar
---
Future Drummer
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by --- »

Orpheus wrote:I am one of the few Americans acually watching the hearing. I have the mental capacity to "keep my eye on the ball" and recognize that these men are also the modern scum of the Earth.
That you think "keeping your eye on the ball" means passing judgement on the character of the individuals involved - subject to an extraordinary amount of incomplete information, and with the particulars of what is known selectively passed through the highly politicized lenses of each side's ideological water carriers - rather than considering the ideas that motivate literally any of the substantive objections to Kavanaugh's nomination means that no, you have not kept your eye on the ball at all.
Last edited by --- on Tue September 04, 2018 8:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46229
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

At least we have decades of of increasingly vicious media attacks on the supreme court to look forward to.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
Post Reply