The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by @SkitchP »

Harris really seemed to be grandstanding. I don't want this guy confirmed, but totally understood his viewpoint to her attempts to get him to admit to something he really wasn't sure of.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12536
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by bada »

McParadigm wrote:I’m not clear what Booker’s intentions are.

He's running for president.
User avatar
logan5ive
A Return To Form
Posts: 151
Joined: Tue March 19, 2013 1:11 pm
Location: TX

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by logan5ive »

So they're releasing (confidential) documents after the hearing started?
80 shows...
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

logan5ive wrote:So they're releasing (confidential) documents after the hearing started?
It’s Fox News, so we should wait for a separate confirmation but it sounds like the markings were changed to allow public disclosure vs committee only per direct request from Bookers office. So if that’s what you meant, yes.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
---
Future Drummer
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by --- »

Bi_3 wrote:you may want to sit down for this, but:
Fox News wrote:“We cleared the documents last night shortly after Senator Booker’s staff asked us to,” said Bill Burck, a lawyer for Bush involved in the release of documents. “We were surprised to learn about Senator Booker’s histrionics this morning because we had already told him he could use the documents publicly."

"Apparently, some just wanted to break the rules and make a scene, but didn’t check their email," a spokesman for committee Republicans said in a statement. The committee posted the same documents.
Huh. It's almost like they're manufacturing outrage, or engaging in cheap political theater.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

“settled law” not “settled law” what relevance do these things have when vetting the single individual holding the swing vote that will dramatically fundamentally alter the future biological course of hundreds of millions of people
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

hm lying is not a good feature of a JUDGE
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

96583UP wrote:hm lying is not a good feature of a JUDGE
Which lies in particular?
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21687
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Simple Torture »

Bi_3 wrote:
96583UP wrote:hm lying is not a good feature of a JUDGE
Which lies in particular?
What time did he say he'd be on stage?
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46229
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

I seriously doubt Kavanaugh cares about any of this. It's a foregone conclusion that he will be confirmed, regardless of what they dig up (which up to this point has been nothing).
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

Bi_3 wrote:
96583UP wrote:hm lying is not a good feature of a JUDGE
Which lies in particular?
Kavanaugh says he never received documents that even **appeared** to have been drafted or prepared by Democratic staff. Then documents are leaked showing he discussed receiving them, that they were flatly labeled as such, and that he was aware. He changes his story to “I thought it was ok.”

Kavanaugh says he was not in any way involved in Bill Pryor’s nomination, then documents leak showing he was directly involved.

Kavanaugh to the panel: R v W is settled. Kavanaugh in documents: not really tho lol.

Kavanaugh is then, after all of this, asked a question about another sensitive topic, and gives an answer (basically “I’m happy to be reminded what I have said”) that is more or less “tell me what you know I have said first so I don’t get caught in a lie.” He also spent almost all of the afternoon refusing to answer questions, which was a big shift from before the doc dump started.

I do agree with Burt that there’s no stopping his approval though.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

You forgot the time he lied during his background investigation when he failed to disclose that in 2004 he did a rolling stop leaving Hollywood Video with a used Seabiscut DVD in hand
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

Yeah what’s a little lying under oath after all
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by bune »

Bi_3 wrote:
ABNorman wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:So much for private conversations between government officials.
Oh no.
Laugh all you want, this is going to have serious long term effects on how officials communicate.
That's the same thing they said after the first wikileaks release of the diplomatic cables. Didn't happen.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

Simple Torture wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
96583UP wrote:hm lying is not a good feature of a JUDGE
Which lies in particular?
What time did he say he'd be on stage?
at least we got to buy a lot of MAGA merch while we waited
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21687
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Simple Torture »

96583UP wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
96583UP wrote:hm lying is not a good feature of a JUDGE
Which lies in particular?
What time did he say he'd be on stage?
at least we got to buy a lot of MAGA merch while we waited
:nice:
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46229
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

The perfect woman does not exis-- Image
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40664
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by wease »

Who is that lady?
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
Post Reply