96583UP wrote:read an article today that her and her lawyers haven't yet responded as to whether she will attend on Monday
also
In Hiding
She has. She doesn’t want public testimony without an FBI investigation, due to the committees’s desire to avoid calling others and essentially make it a “he said she said.”
can the FBI investigate? isn't there a statute of limitations on this stuff?
I believe they do background checks on potential nominees. So not a criminal investigation, but basically character interviews and such.
ok
so he's going to be nominated
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Yeah, the whole point of scheduling a hearing with no other witnesses or investigation was to make it upsetting enough to get her to back out. I have zero doubt that they are thrilled by this development.
cutuphalfdead wrote:who among us hasn't held a woman down to the point she was afraid she'd be strangled and tried to rip off her clothes only to be stopped by someone tackling them?
cutuphalfdead wrote:who among us hasn't held a woman down to the point she was afraid she'd be strangled and tried to rip off her clothes only to be stopped by someone tackling them?
Very, very good post
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
i wonder if even, all she'd need to do is show up and say nothing and the GOP loses
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
cutuphalfdead wrote:who among us hasn't held a woman down to the point she was afraid she'd be strangled and tried to rip off her clothes only to be stopped by someone tackling them?
so what inalienable right will BK dismantle first?
13th amendment?
Roe v Wade?
$5 footlongs?
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
A reminder that intimidating Ford into silence, besides being a bad look going into the elections, also has the potential for long lasting repercussions as well.
