The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
run2death
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5223
Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm
Location: A Dark Place

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by run2death »

--- wrote:
2) I'm sure you were as equally nonplussed when the Republicans employed a "the means justify the ends" approach to keep Merrick Garland off the bench, yeah?
Nice straw man.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

2) I'm sure you were as equally nonplussed when the Republicans employed a "the means justify the ends" approach to keep Merrick Garland off the bench, yeah?
If this is an attempt at drawing an equivalency, it’s pretty baseless. Republicans simply refused to allow any consideration of a replacement until such time that it could be their own. They were even openly debating if they could maintain that approach through an entire Clinton presidency.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
---
Future Drummer
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by --- »

It shouldn't surprise me that you two have missed the point, but it kind of does.
User avatar
run2death
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5223
Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm
Location: A Dark Place

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by run2death »

Great argument.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

The black knight always triumphs, I guess
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
---
Future Drummer
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by --- »

run2death wrote:Great argument.
Well, if you insist.

Strat mentioned that a particular end - "keeping a conservative judge off the court" - is what's of value, and the merit of the means employed in keeping said judge off the court almost certainly matter less (perhaps I've unfairly read too much into his post). It's to this sentiment I was responding.

Nowhere have I equated the particulars of the means involved in each of the two episodes (not least because these kinds of disagreements are boring and full of tired in-group/out-group rancor); Republicans railroading what appeared to be an imminently qualified judge from getting a fair hearing, and Democrats granting dispensation to "believe all victims" instead of "innocent until proven guilty" only because it is in the instant case politically expedient. That these means differ is not something I would deny. The equivalence is in the limiting political calculus that each side seems so unable to move beyond: my team has to win, at all costs. That those costs differ across time, place, and circumstance - and that it's almost impossible for one team to not run up a higher bill, to continue the analogy - is not in dispute.

You both read something into my post that wasn't there.
Last edited by --- on Fri September 21, 2018 7:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46234
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

From a tactical standpoint, the best thing republicans can do is go ahead as normal with the confirmation until some actual evidence appears. Delaying and letting democrats bitch for weeks while pushing emotional #believethewoman bullshit won't do them any favors. Learn to spend your political capital.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25047
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

BurtReynolds wrote:pushing emotional #believethewoman bullshit
:?
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25047
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

tragabigzanda wrote:Plowing right through is what these guys do best.
It's certainly Kavanaugh's modis operandi.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
washing machine
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15816
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Space City

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by washing machine »

I can’t help but think that Scalia and Breyer, if given the chance to debate this calmly in front of an audience, might have both at least acknowledged the potential for long term damage this is causing to both parties and the court itself in much the same way that thodoks just illustrated a few posts ago.
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46234
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

B wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:pushing emotional #believethewoman bullshit
:?
:?
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

BurtReynolds wrote:
B wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:pushing emotional #believethewoman bullshit
:?
:?
#whyIdidntreport
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46234
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

McParadigm wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
B wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:pushing emotional #believethewoman bullshit
:?
:?
#whyIdidntreport
thats a pretty stupid reason.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

BurtReynolds wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
B wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:pushing emotional #believethewoman bullshit
:?
:?
#whyIdidntreport
thats a pretty stupid reason.
#whyIdidntrevealthatIdidntreport
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 4/5 »

washing machine wrote:I can’t help but think that Scalia and Breyer, if given the chance to debate this calmly in front of an audience, might have both at least acknowledged the potential for long term damage this is causing to both parties and the court itself in much the same way that thodoks just illustrated a few posts ago.
I think Ruth Bader Ginsburg publicly lamented the politicization of the judicial nomination process just the other day.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
bart
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4197
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by bart »

I mean, justices used to usually just be straight up politicians, so
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46234
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

Who was under the delusion that the supreme court nomination process wasn't political before this?
RM's resident disinformation expert.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by digster »

This seems not awesome. I thought the Republicans were saying they had no idea who this person was until she went public.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

So this is an absurd fake claim that came out of nowhere...but also we anticipated the possibility of it like magic?
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

i just want this thing to be over

it's like watching your team having been down 24-0 at the start of the 4th quarter and you had accepted the loss but then thanks to two quick scores and a pick 6 it's 24-21 and there 2 minutes left but they have the ball and you have no timeouts and you just know it's just over

where's the fumbled snap recovery to save the U.S. judicial system?
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Post Reply