Nice straw man.--- wrote:
2) I'm sure you were as equally nonplussed when the Republicans employed a "the means justify the ends" approach to keep Merrick Garland off the bench, yeah?
The Supreme Court
- run2death
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 5223
- Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm
- Location: A Dark Place
Re: The Supreme Court
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: The Supreme Court
If this is an attempt at drawing an equivalency, it’s pretty baseless. Republicans simply refused to allow any consideration of a replacement until such time that it could be their own. They were even openly debating if they could maintain that approach through an entire Clinton presidency.2) I'm sure you were as equally nonplussed when the Republicans employed a "the means justify the ends" approach to keep Merrick Garland off the bench, yeah?
(patriotic choking noises)
- ---
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
It shouldn't surprise me that you two have missed the point, but it kind of does.
- run2death
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 5223
- Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm
- Location: A Dark Place
Re: The Supreme Court
Great argument.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
- ---
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Well, if you insist.run2death wrote:Great argument.
Strat mentioned that a particular end - "keeping a conservative judge off the court" - is what's of value, and the merit of the means employed in keeping said judge off the court almost certainly matter less (perhaps I've unfairly read too much into his post). It's to this sentiment I was responding.
Nowhere have I equated the particulars of the means involved in each of the two episodes (not least because these kinds of disagreements are boring and full of tired in-group/out-group rancor); Republicans railroading what appeared to be an imminently qualified judge from getting a fair hearing, and Democrats granting dispensation to "believe all victims" instead of "innocent until proven guilty" only because it is in the instant case politically expedient. That these means differ is not something I would deny. The equivalence is in the limiting political calculus that each side seems so unable to move beyond: my team has to win, at all costs. That those costs differ across time, place, and circumstance - and that it's almost impossible for one team to not run up a higher bill, to continue the analogy - is not in dispute.
You both read something into my post that wasn't there.
Last edited by --- on Fri September 21, 2018 7:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46234
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: The Supreme Court
From a tactical standpoint, the best thing republicans can do is go ahead as normal with the confirmation until some actual evidence appears. Delaying and letting democrats bitch for weeks while pushing emotional #believethewoman bullshit won't do them any favors. Learn to spend your political capital.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 25047
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court
BurtReynolds wrote:pushing emotional #believethewoman bullshit
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 25047
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court
It's certainly Kavanaugh's modis operandi.tragabigzanda wrote:Plowing right through is what these guys do best.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- washing machine
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15816
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
- Location: Space City
Re: The Supreme Court
I can’t help but think that Scalia and Breyer, if given the chance to debate this calmly in front of an audience, might have both at least acknowledged the potential for long term damage this is causing to both parties and the court itself in much the same way that thodoks just illustrated a few posts ago.
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46234
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: The Supreme Court
B wrote:BurtReynolds wrote:pushing emotional #believethewoman bullshit
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: The Supreme Court
#whyIdidntreportBurtReynolds wrote:B wrote:BurtReynolds wrote:pushing emotional #believethewoman bullshit
(patriotic choking noises)
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46234
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: The Supreme Court
thats a pretty stupid reason.McParadigm wrote:#whyIdidntreportBurtReynolds wrote:B wrote:BurtReynolds wrote:pushing emotional #believethewoman bullshit
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: The Supreme Court
#whyIdidntrevealthatIdidntreportBurtReynolds wrote:thats a pretty stupid reason.McParadigm wrote:#whyIdidntreportBurtReynolds wrote:B wrote:BurtReynolds wrote:pushing emotional #believethewoman bullshit
(patriotic choking noises)
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6989
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
I think Ruth Bader Ginsburg publicly lamented the politicization of the judicial nomination process just the other day.washing machine wrote:I can’t help but think that Scalia and Breyer, if given the chance to debate this calmly in front of an audience, might have both at least acknowledged the potential for long term damage this is causing to both parties and the court itself in much the same way that thodoks just illustrated a few posts ago.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- bart
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4197
- Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
I mean, justices used to usually just be straight up politicians, so
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46234
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: The Supreme Court
Who was under the delusion that the supreme court nomination process wasn't political before this?
RM's resident disinformation expert.
-
digster
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am
Re: The Supreme Court
This seems not awesome. I thought the Republicans were saying they had no idea who this person was until she went public.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: The Supreme Court
So this is an absurd fake claim that came out of nowhere...but also we anticipated the possibility of it like magic?
(patriotic choking noises)
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29881
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: The Supreme Court
i just want this thing to be over
it's like watching your team having been down 24-0 at the start of the 4th quarter and you had accepted the loss but then thanks to two quick scores and a pick 6 it's 24-21 and there 2 minutes left but they have the ball and you have no timeouts and you just know it's just over
where's the fumbled snap recovery to save the U.S. judicial system?
it's like watching your team having been down 24-0 at the start of the 4th quarter and you had accepted the loss but then thanks to two quick scores and a pick 6 it's 24-21 and there 2 minutes left but they have the ball and you have no timeouts and you just know it's just over
where's the fumbled snap recovery to save the U.S. judicial system?
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone