Republicans have to be aware that Democrats are going to be more eager to pack the court if they do plow it through.tragabigzanda wrote:Plowing right through is what these guys do best.
The Supreme Court
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29881
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: The Supreme Court
I just read an article that made light of the fact that it wasn't until 1984 that states started changing the drinking age from 18 to 21. 1986 was the cutoff date.
the 2nd half of Bart O'Kavanaugh's senior year he was 18 and legally allowed to buy and consume
hence the treasurer of the keg club
attempted rape aside, should someone be shat on for buying kegs and drinking them when it was legal to do so?
the answer is clearly yes
the 2nd half of Bart O'Kavanaugh's senior year he was 18 and legally allowed to buy and consume
hence the treasurer of the keg club
attempted rape aside, should someone be shat on for buying kegs and drinking them when it was legal to do so?
the answer is clearly yes
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46234
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: The Supreme Court
You’ll see on my calendar here from when I was 17 that I did not attend an underage drinking party and also that I definitely did not go to see Titanic twice while it was in the theaters.
(patriotic choking noises)
- run2death
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 5223
- Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm
- Location: A Dark Place
- bart
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4197
- Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Who's on deck?
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51690
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51690
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
BurtReynolds wrote:

- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51690
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29881
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: The Supreme Court
GOP either did not do their due diligence on this guy or they did and Trump really wanted him because he is mas puervo as well
https://variety.com/2018/politics/news/ ... 202954080/“I wasn’t going to touch a penis until I was married,” Ramirez said of the incident. “I was embarrassed and ashamed and humiliated.” She told the New Yorker that she remembers Kavanaugh standing to her right and laughing, pulling up his pants. “Brett was laughing,” she said. “I can still see his face, and his hips coming forward, like when you pull up your pants.”
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29881
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: The Supreme Court
wait - what's this one? link?tragabigzanda wrote: *3. Mark Ford's ex-girlfriend's account of a gangbang style assault on a drunken woman (Kavanaugh is one of the perpetrators)
always cite your sources.
- Spoiler: show
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- bart
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4197
- Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
It's in the New Yorker story.
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29881
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: The Supreme Court
yeah i see it now
gross
gross
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- run2death
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 5223
- Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm
- Location: A Dark Place
Re: The Supreme Court
We mustn't succumb to these accounts only because it is politically expedient, trag.tragabigzanda wrote:So there's:
1. Dr. Ford
2. Deborah Ramirez
*3. Mark Ford's ex-girlfriend's account of a gangbang style assault on a drunken woman (Kavanaugh is one of the perpetrators)
*4. Michael Avenatti's as-yet unnamed client
*Avenatti has clarified that his client is not Deborah Ramirez, but it's unclear if his client is the same woman as #3.
So that's 3 or 4 accusations now. Surely that's enough to sink this guy, right?
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29881
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: The Supreme Court
the GOP are dumb af for nominating this guy
they should have just found some nerd
they should have just found some nerd
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29881
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: The Supreme Court
these women the GOP are attempting to delegitimize - these aren't porn stars or playmates or whatever
these are upper class / ivy league women
not the same impact as disparaging the Trump's entertainment industry tramps
these are the children of 'landed elites'. you can't just shit on these people and not experience backlash from the upper rings of society
they have a socio-economic network, credentials, degrees, etc
GOP stepped in shit bigtime with this one
these are upper class / ivy league women
not the same impact as disparaging the Trump's entertainment industry tramps
these are the children of 'landed elites'. you can't just shit on these people and not experience backlash from the upper rings of society
they have a socio-economic network, credentials, degrees, etc
GOP stepped in shit bigtime with this one
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51690
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- run2death
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 5223
- Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm
- Location: A Dark Place
Re: The Supreme Court
Yeah, I was kidding. It was a reference to a previous post.