The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

tragabigzanda wrote:Plowing right through is what these guys do best.
Republicans have to be aware that Democrats are going to be more eager to pack the court if they do plow it through.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

I just read an article that made light of the fact that it wasn't until 1984 that states started changing the drinking age from 18 to 21. 1986 was the cutoff date.

the 2nd half of Bart O'Kavanaugh's senior year he was 18 and legally allowed to buy and consume

hence the treasurer of the keg club

attempted rape aside, should someone be shat on for buying kegs and drinking them when it was legal to do so?

the answer is clearly yes
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46234
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

You’ll see on my calendar here from when I was 17 that I did not attend an underage drinking party and also that I definitely did not go to see Titanic twice while it was in the theaters.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
run2death
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5223
Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm
Location: A Dark Place

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by run2death »

welp
User avatar
bart
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4197
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by bart »

Who's on deck?
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

BurtReynolds wrote:
Image
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

GOP either did not do their due diligence on this guy or they did and Trump really wanted him because he is mas puervo as well
“I wasn’t going to touch a penis until I was married,” Ramirez said of the incident. “I was embarrassed and ashamed and humiliated.” She told the New Yorker that she remembers Kavanaugh standing to her right and laughing, pulling up his pants. “Brett was laughing,” she said. “I can still see his face, and his hips coming forward, like when you pull up your pants.”
https://variety.com/2018/politics/news/ ... 202954080/
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

tragabigzanda wrote: *3. Mark Ford's ex-girlfriend's account of a gangbang style assault on a drunken woman (Kavanaugh is one of the perpetrators)
wait - what's this one? link?

always cite your sources.
Spoiler: show
it's the backbone of the Pete T. internet research method
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
bart
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4197
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by bart »

It's in the New Yorker story.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

yeah i see it now

gross
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
run2death
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5223
Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm
Location: A Dark Place

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by run2death »

tragabigzanda wrote:So there's:

1. Dr. Ford
2. Deborah Ramirez
*3. Mark Ford's ex-girlfriend's account of a gangbang style assault on a drunken woman (Kavanaugh is one of the perpetrators)
*4. Michael Avenatti's as-yet unnamed client

*Avenatti has clarified that his client is not Deborah Ramirez, but it's unclear if his client is the same woman as #3.

So that's 3 or 4 accusations now. Surely that's enough to sink this guy, right?
We mustn't succumb to these accounts only because it is politically expedient, trag.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

the GOP are dumb af for nominating this guy

they should have just found some nerd
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

these women the GOP are attempting to delegitimize - these aren't porn stars or playmates or whatever

these are upper class / ivy league women

not the same impact as disparaging the Trump's entertainment industry tramps

these are the children of 'landed elites'. you can't just shit on these people and not experience backlash from the upper rings of society

they have a socio-economic network, credentials, degrees, etc

GOP stepped in shit bigtime with this one
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

Well this is going well
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
run2death
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5223
Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm
Location: A Dark Place

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by run2death »

Yeah, I was kidding. It was a reference to a previous post.
Post Reply