Ha! What a douche.B wrote:Well, Renate Schroeder, one of the 65 women who signed a letter of support for Kavanaugh found out this week that he was secretly calling her a slut behind her back when they released his yearbook of evidence of his high moral character.BurtReynolds wrote:can we get an official list going? Because I'm pretty sure people are just counting the same ones over and over.run2death wrote:Are we in double digits yet?
I have :
1. Ford: sexual assault in high school. no evidence. no witnesses. passed a lie detector test in which she was asked only two pertinent questions. 4 people swore she told them her story decades later, and this qualifies as proof somehow.
2. Ramirez: his dick was in her face at a party in college. won't testify without an investigation. no evidence. no witnesses.
3. Swetnick: saw him in line at a gang rape party in college, which apparently she frequented quite often, yet no one has ever heard of her or any of this. Has about as much credibility as pizzagate for a few reasons.
4. Some loon who called for a coup and accused Trump of manslaughter. later recanted, but #believesurvivors, right? (incredibly, this was considered to be a serious accusation, as CNN and others apparently considered it to have merit)
5. I think one more? some anonymous one. no date, place, names. but yeah I'm sure this is the one that will do him in.
Are we done with this bullshit now?
The Supreme Court
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40669
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: The Supreme Court
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- run2death
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 5223
- Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm
- Location: A Dark Place
-
Electromatic
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
The due date for being done is November 6th or so.... until then, probably one a week.BurtReynolds wrote:can we get an official list going? Because I'm pretty sure people are just counting the same ones over and over.run2death wrote:Are we in double digits yet?
I have :
1. Ford: sexual assault in high school. no evidence. no witnesses. passed a lie detector test in which she was asked only two pertinent questions. 4 people swore she told them her story decades later, and this qualifies as proof somehow.
2. Ramirez: his dick was in her face at a party in college. won't testify without an investigation. no evidence. no witnesses.
3. Swetnick: saw him in line at a gang rape party in college, which apparently she frequented quite often, yet no one has ever heard of her or any of this. Has about as much credibility as pizzagate for a few reasons.
4. Some loon who called for a coup and accused Trump of manslaughter. later recanted, but #believesurvivors, right? (incredibly, this was considered to be a serious accusation, as CNN and others apparently considered it to have merit)
5. I think one more? some anonymous one. no date, place, names. but yeah I'm sure this is the one that will do him in.
Are we done with this bullshit now?
- ---
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Thought of this post after reading something about the history of confirmations and confirmation hearings the other day.BurtReynolds wrote:Who was under the delusion that the supreme court nomination process wasn't political before this?
Antonin Scalia was confirmed 98-0, Ruth Bader Ginsburg was confirmed 96-3, and Clarence Thomas was confirmed by a Democratic-majority Senate. The process might have always been political, but it's never been this partisan. I'm not optimistic we'll ever get back to the point where this process - any political process, really - isn't hopelessly compromised by partisan fatuousness.
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21688
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: The Supreme Court
There's a lot going on, but I don't want the day to move on much further before we acknowledge that Grassley cannot pronounce the name "Ramirez" (and it's the first "r" that gives him trouble)
McParadigm wrote:lol
-
digster
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am
Re: The Supreme Court
This setup is absolutely bizarre. I know why the Republicans did it, but it's still asinine.
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35418
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: The Supreme Court
This is actually quite heartbreaking
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15599
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: The Supreme Court
i know you meant nothing by it, but in case you did, why the use of the word "actually?"Strat wrote:This is actually quite heartbreaking
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
- Superblood Wolfmoon
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Thu November 21, 2013 10:01 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Boy, Chuck Grassley doesn't come off like an angry old grandpa at all.
I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35418
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: The Supreme Court
He's an awful human being.meatwad wrote:Boy, Chuck Grassley doesn't come off like an angry old grandpa at all.
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: The Supreme Court
This is such a shit show. These breaks every 5 minutes so that this God awful panel can interject their political ramblings is really distracting. We just need linear questioning from the bull dyke lawyer lady uninterrupted.
Dick/Balls
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: The Supreme Court
Former political director for the RNC and still working GOP campaign strategist:meatwad wrote:Boy, Chuck Grassley doesn't come off like an angry old grandpa at all.
(patriotic choking noises)
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
- Superblood Wolfmoon
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Thu November 21, 2013 10:01 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
I can't believe Republicans let this move forward. I can't understand why Kavanaugh is their man until the bitter end, but I think by the end of the day it's going to be clear he won't be confirmed. And what a disaster that is a month before the midterms.
I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: The Supreme Court
If the White House wont pull him and he won’t step aside, their only real options are “investigate the claims properly, and risk running out of time to get a replacement lined up,” or “rush the defense and then let him fail in a full vote.”meatwad wrote:I can't believe Republicans let this move forward. I can't understand why Kavanaugh is their man until the bitter end, but I think by the end of the day it's going to be clear he won't be confirmed. And what a disaster that is a month before the midterms.
(patriotic choking noises)
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12537
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Ugh Blumenthal.
- Superblood Wolfmoon
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Thu November 21, 2013 10:01 pm
