The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by bune »

McParadigm wrote:
bune wrote:
McParadigm wrote:Yeah, this guy is gonna do fine under investigation.
OK, what does this actually mean though.
They had to sideline the outside prosecutor they selected, because Kav almost immediately put her in the position of being professionally required to point out that he lied.
That's what I thought it meant but I'm on a lot of cold medicine this morning.
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by bune »

I just don't get the political calculus of the general attitude of the country right now vs. party line votes, especially for the people who want to go Presidential.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

McParadigm wrote:Flake is having his usual last minute waffling anxiety attack.
Still ongoing
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Simple Torture »

McParadigm wrote:
McParadigm wrote:Flake is having his usual last minute waffling anxiety attack.
Still ongoing
Maybe a delay in the vote? Wants to call more witnesses?
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

Everyone is in the anteroom. No one is left in the chamber. Ten minutes past scheduled vote time.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29884
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

BurtReynolds wrote:This is your daily reminder that there isn't a shred of proof to back up any of these claims,
sworn testimony from the accuser, Brett's calendar and yearbook which support the claim that he was a blackout party drunk (something he lied to when asked under oath initially) and that he engaged in threesomes ('devil's triangle') constitute more than a 'shred'
most of the allegations aren't credible in the slightest,
not according to the POTUS
belief of guilt based on accusation alone is morally repugnant
correct, fortunately that isn't the case here
, and political showmanship and gamesmanship are rife in both parties.
correct, and far worse by the GOP
Have a good day, angry white males.
you too, pot

- kettle
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29884
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

can a supreme court justice be impeached?

thinking that after this vote passes and women / individuals with self-respect who may have voted republican previously either don't vote or vote democrat in the midterms and the Dems take both houses maybe they do a 2-for-1 and take down Trump for treason and Kavanaugh for perjure
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46239
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

96583UP wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:This is your daily reminder that there isn't a shred of proof to back up any of these claims,
sworn testimony from the accuser, Brett's calendar and yearbook which support the claim that he was a blackout party drunk (something he lied to when asked under oath initially) and that he engaged in threesomes ('devil's triangle') constitute more than a 'shred'
No that very much constitutes a "shred", and that's being charitable.

Let's not forget that he was also alive at the time the crime allegedly occurred, so that's some more proof right there.

Although we're apparently not even sure about the when.
Last edited by BurtReynolds on Fri September 28, 2018 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

So does McConnell honor this last minute deal? If not, does Jeff Flake have the gumption to oh never mind.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29884
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

BurtReynolds wrote:
96583UP wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:This is your daily reminder that there isn't a shred of proof to back up any of these claims,
sworn testimony from the accuser, Brett's calendar and yearbook which support the claim that he was a blackout party drunk (something he lied to when asked under oath initially) and that he engaged in threesomes ('devil's triangle') constitute more than a 'shred'
No that very much constitutes a "shred", and that's being charitable.

Let's not forget that he was also alive at the time the crime allegedly occurred, so that's some more proof right there.

Although we're apparently not even sure about the when.
Fortunately, best friend of the nominee Mark Judge wrote a book about it all
Wasted describes in detail the author's secondary education memories, particularly those involving heavy alcohol usage by his peers and himself at Georgetown Preparatory School.[2][6][27] The author writes that the social environment of his peers at the school was, "positively swimming in alcohol".[10][9][11] Judge recounts a hookup culture involving binge drinking, especially during a period of time at the school known as "Beach Week".[6][7][8] Judge defined "Beach Week" at Georgetown Preparatory School as a "week-long bacchanalia of drinking and sex, or at least attempts at sex".[8][28][29] The author discusses a phrase, "100 Kegs Or Bust", in relation to excessive alcohol drinking during his times at Georgetown Preparartory School.[30][27][31] Judge remembers a student he refers to as Bart O'Kavanaugh who passed out and threw up in a car.[32][33][34] The author recounts going to drink alcohol with his friends at bars for many evenings in a row.[2] He presents in-depth memories of orgies and attempts to have sex fueled with alcohol at residences along the beach shoreline.[2][35]
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
washing machine
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15816
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Space City

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by washing machine »

Two-hour rule? This is chaos today, right?
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

Every day
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 4/5 »

96583UP wrote:can a supreme court justice be impeached?

thinking that after this vote passes and women / individuals with self-respect who may have voted republican previously either don't vote or vote democrat in the midterms and the Dems take both houses maybe they do a 2-for-1 and take down Trump for treason and Kavanaugh for perjure
Yes, but removal requires 2/3 of the Senate, so...
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36758
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Jorge »

--- wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
--- wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
--- wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:I didn't watch much of yesterday's hearing/coverage but I'm not really sure how someone on the fence could walk away from those hearings thinking "yes, absolutely yes".
"I have no basis for this claim I'm about to make, but I'm going to make it anyway."
It was long ago read it in the movements of interstellar bodies, by those seeking such universal truths as can only be found when living by the one true celestial calendar and using both stars and nonsense to seek out those qualities that make us all unique.
If I'm picking up what you're laying down here, the joke is most definitely not on me.
Yeah but only like 4 people know that! You play a dangerous game when you engage in archival copypaste
I am fine with this, and will continue to risk being misunderstood - pilloried even! - in the name of decent posting.
A truly Argonautian approach
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Simple Torture »

Could we get one fucking normal day.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46239
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

Simple Torture wrote:Could we get one fucking normal day.
Haha the amazing thing is that it's only gonna get weirder from here on out.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
---
Future Drummer
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by --- »

bottom page
User avatar
---
Future Drummer
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by --- »

bottom page
Post Reply