The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46239
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

McParadigm wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:I know we're moving on to the "ok, he didn't rape anybody, but he lied about drinking and he has a bad attitude" portion of the inquisition
I know we’re moving on to the “ok, he flagrantly lied about drinking and yearbook stuff, but he should still be believed about everything else because otherwise we can’t own the libs,” portion of the tribal meltdown, but why do you feel the need to also completely misrepresent non-conservatives as “moving on,” doubting the allegations of sexual assault that are currently under investigation?
I can own the libs either way. Either they are dumb enough to believe he's a rapist because he supposedly lied about drinking when there is no actual evidence of a crime, or they know there is no proof and have switched to technicalities to throw off his nomination. which would you prefer?

How is that the case against him has actually gotten worse in less than a week? We started from a place of no witnesses, proof, or even dates, yet somehow they look even more clueless.

He shouldn't be believed. She shouldn't be believed. The evidence should be believed. There is none.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46239
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

Image
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

Uh, Burt...the injustice in that book occurs because a bunch of dumb white conservatives side with the person they want to be right, even though that person is repeatedly caught lying.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46239
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

McParadigm wrote:Uh, Burt...the injustice in that book occurs because a bunch of dumb white conservatives side with the person they want to be right, even though that person is repeatedly caught lying.
And now we have a bunch of dumb white liberals siding with a person they want to be right, even though that person has offered no proof whatsoever.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by digster »

I feel like it might be easier to find proof one way or the other regarding Ford's allegations about Kavanaugh if the FBI is allowed to talk to Ford. Or Kavanaugh. That seems pretty straightforward.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 9:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46239
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

Oh I think waiting to the last minute to drop an assault allegation has been an amazingly effective strategy, and might still work. People are creatures of their emotions. The democrats don't even need facts to pull it off.

As far as hail mary's go, its an powerful (if slimy) one.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Superblood Wolfmoon
AnalLog
Posts: 1867
Joined: Thu November 21, 2013 10:01 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Superblood Wolfmoon »

NBC is reporting that a mutual friend of BK and Deborah Ramirez has turned over text messages to the FBI that indicate BK was contacting friends directly and through reps as far back as July to provide cover on a potential Ramirez story. So at the very least that would be another instance of lying to the Judiciary Committee as he told Orrin Hatch the first time he heard of Ramirez's claim was September 24.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/suprem ... ce-n915566
I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 9:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by verb_to_trust »

tragabigzanda wrote:is there any real recourse for lying to the committee? he wasn't under oath, so...?
Not getting the job.
Dick/Balls
User avatar
Superblood Wolfmoon
AnalLog
Posts: 1867
Joined: Thu November 21, 2013 10:01 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Superblood Wolfmoon »

tragabigzanda wrote:is there any real recourse for lying to the committee? he wasn't under oath, so...?
He was absolutely under oath.
I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd.
User avatar
Superblood Wolfmoon
AnalLog
Posts: 1867
Joined: Thu November 21, 2013 10:01 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Superblood Wolfmoon »

verb_to_trust wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:is there any real recourse for lying to the committee? he wasn't under oath, so...?
Not getting the job.
Disbarment?
I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 9:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

tragabigzanda wrote:is there any real recourse for lying to the committee? he wasn't under oath, so...?
If this is the end of it, possibly nothing. Depends on Flake, Collins, and Murkowski.

But it’s only Monday.

It’s worth remembering that at the start of all this, the reporting was that Grassley and McConnell wanted to get him passed expeditiously. Their concern was said to be that, over time, they’d lose control of the narrative. Then Ford stepped forward, and the reporting was that they wanted to deal with her expeditiously, so they would be done before “other accusations“ could surface. Then other accusations appeared, and they tried to push through anyway. And when they couldn’t, they worked to limit the scope of the investigation because etc.

And now you have text messages from his friends, talking about a supposedly made up accusation two months before it was supposedly made up...and well before he claimed to have learned of it. And you have former classmates issuing statements to the press or going on camera to accuse him of lying about his drinking habits.

And, again, it’s only Monday.

There’s clearly been a lot of work going on behind the scenes to limit the potential risk to the nomination, and he still has decent odds on surviving. But none of these behaviors at the party level are indicative of any kind of confidence that there’s no there, there.
It’s only Monday...
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35418
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Strat »

McParadigm wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:is there any real recourse for lying to the committee? he wasn't under oath, so...?
If this is the end of it, possibly nothing. Depends on Flake, Collins, and Murkowski.

But it’s only Monday.

It’s worth remembering that at the start of all this, the reporting was that Grassley and McConnell wanted to get him passed expeditiously. Their concern was said to be that, over time, they’d lose control of the narrative. Then Ford stepped forward, and the reporting was that they wanted to deal with her expeditiously, so they would be done before “other accusations“ could surface. Then other accusations appeared, and they tried to push through anyway. And when they couldn’t, they worked to limit the scope of the investigation because etc.

And now you have text messages from his friends, talking about a supposedly made up accusation two months before it was supposedly made up...and well before he claimed to have learned of it. And you have former classmates issuing statements to the press or going on camera to accuse him of lying about his drinking habits.

And, again, it’s only Monday.

There’s clearly been a lot of work going on behind the scenes to limit the potential risk to the nomination, and he still has decent odds on surviving. But none of these behaviors at the party level are indicative of any kind of confidence that there’s no there, there.
It’s only Monday...
Hmm. Guy was probably causing BK to be late for church. That’d piss off any good catholic
User avatar
bart
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4198
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by bart »

"Throwing ice" should be slang for being decked out in jewelry.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

The “due process is in terrible peril” crowd is chanting “lock her up” right now at the rally.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29884
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

BurtReynolds wrote:A literal swamp monster.
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25049
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

BurtReynolds wrote:
McParadigm wrote:Uh, Burt...the injustice in that book occurs because a bunch of dumb white conservatives side with the person they want to be right, even though that person is repeatedly caught lying.
And now we have a bunch of dumb white liberals siding with a person they want to be right, even though that person has offered no proof whatsoever.
That's not the same thing.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29884
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

:nice: enough of this :nice: white-bashing

:nice:
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Post Reply