Boston Red Sox Thread

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by elliseamos »

Self wrote:Image
you think? i was expecting the royals to be tough considering how they've been playing of late.
User avatar
Self
Polluted
Posts: 4644
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
Location: PM me, I have everything.

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Self »

elliseamos wrote:you think? i was expecting the royals to be tough considering how they've been playing of late.
Nah, I was just being a dick. They've got 3 games on the Rays, and the schedule isn't daunting. But, dropping 3 out of 4 to KC, no matter how they're playing, is a bit underwhelming. Still, the year-to-year turnaround is enough for me.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by elliseamos »

Self wrote:
elliseamos wrote:you think? i was expecting the royals to be tough considering how they've been playing of late.
Nah, I was just being a dick. They've got 3 games on the Rays, and the schedule isn't daunting. But, dropping 3 out of 4 to KC, no matter how they're playing, is a bit underwhelming. Still, the year-to-year turnaround is enough for me.
KC did well to get Shields & Davis from TB. they're not the royals of recent past.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

elliseamos wrote:
Self wrote:
elliseamos wrote:you think? i was expecting the royals to be tough considering how they've been playing of late.
Nah, I was just being a dick. They've got 3 games on the Rays, and the schedule isn't daunting. But, dropping 3 out of 4 to KC, no matter how they're playing, is a bit underwhelming. Still, the year-to-year turnaround is enough for me.
KC did well to get Shields & Davis from TB. they're not the royals of recent past.
that trade was awful for KC. They are nowhere near the position you'd need to be in to justify a win-now trade like that.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by elliseamos »

numbers wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
Self wrote:
elliseamos wrote:you think? i was expecting the royals to be tough considering how they've been playing of late.
Nah, I was just being a dick. They've got 3 games on the Rays, and the schedule isn't daunting. But, dropping 3 out of 4 to KC, no matter how they're playing, is a bit underwhelming. Still, the year-to-year turnaround is enough for me.
KC did well to get Shields & Davis from TB. they're not the royals of recent past.
that trade was awful for KC. They are nowhere near the position you'd need to be in to justify a win-now trade like that.
i don't know if it was "win-now" as much as it was about getting 2 SP for 1 OF. Supposedly it would have been Lester, Doubront, plus others for the same thing that TB got in return. I'd take Wade Davis & James Shields over Lester & Doubront.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

The royals traded their top prospect, one of the top prospects in the game, for a poor mans ace(who's contract is up soon) and a back end starter. That's a trade you make when Shields and Davis are the final two pieces to make you a World Series contender.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by elliseamos »

numbers wrote:The royals traded their top prospect, one of the top prospects in the game, for a poor mans ace(who's contract is up soon) and a back end starter. That's a trade you make when Shields and Davis are the final two pieces to make you a World Series contender.
but having a top-prospect OF hasn't done much for the likes of LAA or WAS, no? you can't piece together a rotation (w/o spending top dollar) like you can a line-up/defense.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Norah »

numbers wrote:The royals traded their top prospect, one of the top prospects in the game, for a poor mans ace(who's contract is up soon) and a back end starter. That's a trade you make when Shields and Davis are the final two pieces to make you a World Series contender.
Yup. And we should have been the ones to rape them for Myers.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:The royals traded their top prospect, one of the top prospects in the game, for a poor mans ace(who's contract is up soon) and a back end starter. That's a trade you make when Shields and Davis are the final two pieces to make you a World Series contender.
Yup. And we should have been the ones to rape them for Myers.
Well the Rays were alot better positioned to make that trade, but yeah, I think in hindsight I would have. Doubront has been much better than I thought he would have been in the winter though.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by elliseamos »

VICTORINO!!!
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by philpritchard »

Shut up, guys. Just... shut up.
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Coach »

Wow.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by elliseamos »

good for Nap and Lester... but honestly, what the hell was that first run for Toronto? :shake:
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Mickey »

elliseamos wrote:
numbers wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
Self wrote:
elliseamos wrote:you think? i was expecting the royals to be tough considering how they've been playing of late.
Nah, I was just being a dick. They've got 3 games on the Rays, and the schedule isn't daunting. But, dropping 3 out of 4 to KC, no matter how they're playing, is a bit underwhelming. Still, the year-to-year turnaround is enough for me.
KC did well to get Shields & Davis from TB. they're not the royals of recent past.
that trade was awful for KC. They are nowhere near the position you'd need to be in to justify a win-now trade like that.
i don't know if it was "win-now" as much as it was about getting 2 SP for 1 OF. Supposedly it would have been Lester, Doubront, plus others for the same thing that TB got in return. I'd take Wade Davis & James Shields over Lester & Doubront.
Agreed with numbers--not a great trade for KC to make in their position (would have been an amazing trade for, say, Balitmore to really shore up their rotation). Also, don't forget there was another pitching prospect in with Myers--top 50 prospect who has now thrown a no-hitter in triple-A and looks more than poised to fill a Wade Davis role in the future. So...yeah, I pretty much love this trade for the Rays.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by elliseamos »

Mickey wrote:Also, don't forget yada yada yada
i forgot.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by philpritchard »

elliseamos wrote:good for Nap and Lester... but honestly, what the hell was that first run for Toronto? :shake:
Little league!

I'm not proud of this, but I went to bed with two out in the bottom of the ninth. I always regret it when I do that.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

Let the era of x begin
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Simple Torture »

numbers wrote:Let the era of x begin
:thumbsup:
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by elliseamos »

Simple Torture wrote:
numbers wrote:Let the era of x begin
:thumbsup:
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

Im legit excited about this game tonight and seeing him play.
Post Reply