Lightning Bolt: the official album thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Rank Lightning Bolt

5 stars
1
1%
4 stars
4
5%
3 stars
29
37%
2 stars
30
38%
1 star
14
18%
 
Total votes: 78

User avatar
Lounge Lizard
AnalLog
Posts: 1843
Joined: Tue July 23, 2013 6:51 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Lounge Lizard »

harmless wrote:Also, I just spotted this in the BO'B interview that I didn't notice before.

I think we mixed everything in Seattle. They wanted to mix up there because they all wanted to be around. It takes a little longer when everybody is around. I say a "little longer," but It probably took 10 days. That's not a long time for some people, but that seems like a long time to me.

Where they not around for all the mixing last time? That's what this seems to imply (and also that it took longer than BO'B might've hoped...). If they weren't present during the mixing of Backspacer, and they insisted that they should be present this time, maybe it's because they were relatively unhappy with the pop sound. It's only mindless speculation but it's possible, no?
If this is proven wrong in the end, I still like your thinking
Image Image
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

Maybe Backspacer sounded like it did because BO'B got to mix it on his own, with no one around. I'm not sure the actual recording influences the pop sheen / gloss all over the album too much; it will establish stuff like guitar and drum tone, but it's in the mixing where the textures of everything are decided, and I guess they can add more or less of the harmonies, background sounds etc.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Lounge Lizard
AnalLog
Posts: 1843
Joined: Tue July 23, 2013 6:51 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Lounge Lizard »

harmless wrote:Maybe Backspacer sounded like it did because BO'B got to mix it on his own, with no one around. I'm not sure the actual recording influences the pop sheen / gloss all over the album too much; it will establish stuff like guitar and drum tone, but it's in the mixing where the textures of everything are decided, and I guess they can add more or less of the harmonies, background sounds etc.
Even the essentially poppy song Unemployed sounds less poppy than the hardest stuff on Backspacer. I like Backspacer in general but I have to agree its production is terribly poppy.

Is poppy even a word?
Image Image
User avatar
Cleverman
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 317
Joined: Tue July 16, 2013 8:49 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Cleverman »

Two things -

BO'B did five albums with the band, right? Of those five, the consensus is that only one (BS) wasn't well-received. Why the hate? Are people under the impression that if someone like Tchad Blake had produced it, it would have made some major difference? Not being a smart ass, just curious.

Also, I suddenly have this fear that the Ontario soundcheck tune won't even be on the new album! I mighta missed it, but has there been confirmation that song is indeed Sirens or will be on the album?
Satisfaction is the death of desire.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

Lounge Lizard wrote:
harmless wrote:Maybe Backspacer sounded like it did because BO'B got to mix it on his own, with no one around. I'm not sure the actual recording influences the pop sheen / gloss all over the album too much; it will establish stuff like guitar and drum tone, but it's in the mixing where the textures of everything are decided, and I guess they can add more or less of the harmonies, background sounds etc.
Even the essentially poppy song Unemployed sounds less poppy than the hardest stuff on Backspacer. I like Backspacer in general but I have to agree its production is terribly poppy.

Is poppy even a word?
Well, traditionally it's this:

Image

But in the sense of 'sounds like pop' it's used in conversation a lot, so yes.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

Cleverman wrote:Two things -

BO'B did five albums with the band, right? Of those five, the consensus is that only one (BS) wasn't well-received. Why the hate? Are people under the impression that if someone like Tchad Blake had produced it, it would have made some major difference? Not being a smart ass, just curious.
Yes, there would've been a major difference. I mean, a few of the songs are really lacking lyrically but the overall pop production made it sound even worse imo. Sure, it could've been fucked up if it had been produced by someone else (I'm not a fan of S/T's production for other reasons). But for more reasons to dislike BO'B, including his production values, go to the BO'B scapegoat thread.
Cleverman wrote:Also, I suddenly have this fear that the Ontario soundcheck tune won't even be on the new album! I mighta missed it, but has there been confirmation that song is indeed Sirens or will be on the album?
It's just a guess that the soundcheck song is 'Sirens', but BO'B has said that a song called 'Sirens' will be on there. Was it a soundchecked live song, or a studio version played on loud speakers, we don't know, but no one recognises it so there's reason to believe it's a song by Pearl Jam. Why the 'sudden fear' it won't be on there?
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

Lounge Lizard wrote:
harmless wrote:positive speculation
If this is proven wrong in the end, I still like your thinking
I like that thought as well
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by stupidmop »

harmless wrote:Is it just me or has Rolling Stone changed the intro about BO'B being the 6th member of the band? Maybe they had a slew of complaints.

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/ ... t-20130731
That's hilarious, they totally did.
User avatar
Cleverman
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 317
Joined: Tue July 16, 2013 8:49 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Cleverman »

harmless wrote:
Cleverman wrote:Two things -

BO'B did five albums with the band, right? Of those five, the consensus is that only one (BS) wasn't well-received. Why the hate? Are people under the impression that if someone like Tchad Blake had produced it, it would have made some major difference? Not being a smart ass, just curious.
Yes, there would've been a major difference. I mean, a few of the songs are really lacking lyrically but the overall pop production made it sound even worse imo. Sure, it could've been fucked up if it had been produced by someone else (I'm not a fan of S/T's production for other reasons). But for more reasons to dislike BO'B, including his production values, go to the BO'B scapegoat thread.
Cleverman wrote:Also, I suddenly have this fear that the Ontario soundcheck tune won't even be on the new album! I mighta missed it, but has there been confirmation that song is indeed Sirens or will be on the album?
It's just a guess that the soundcheck song is 'Sirens', but BO'B has said that a song called 'Sirens' will be on there. Was it a soundchecked live song, or a studio version played on loud speakers, we don't know, but no one recognises it so there's reason to believe it's a song by Pearl Jam. Why the 'sudden fear' it won't be on there?
Okay, fair enough. I'll have to look through that thread because I always look at a rock producer like how people have the old saying about an NFL quarterback (paraphrasing): Too much credit when the team wins, too much blame when the team loses. Now a hip hop or boy band producer, they're way more involved in the sound of a record, and anyway i quite like the sound of BO'B's other PJ records (No Code and Yield specifically).

As for the sudden fear, I don't know, but of the three new songs we know (or are at least pretty sure) will be on the new album, I really like one (MYM), think one is pretty good (LB) and am really ugh, meh on the other (FD), but the soundcheck song seemed to be more in line (granted, it's not a good recording) with my selfish needs as a fan (big fan of NAIS, Sleight of Hand, PT, etc) and I guess it would figure that it wouldn't be on Lightning Bolt.
Satisfaction is the death of desire.
iceagecoming
A Return To Form
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:13 am
Location: Saint Petersburg

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by iceagecoming »

RE: BO'B, the shiny production of Backspacer seems in-keeping with the feel of those tunes. Tchad Blake is a great producer, but do you really think he would've saved something like Supersonic or Amongst The Waves? The problems with Backspacer aren't first and foremost production issues.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

Cleverman wrote:
harmless wrote:
Cleverman wrote:Two things -

BO'B did five albums with the band, right? Of those five, the consensus is that only one (BS) wasn't well-received. Why the hate? Are people under the impression that if someone like Tchad Blake had produced it, it would have made some major difference? Not being a smart ass, just curious.
Yes, there would've been a major difference. I mean, a few of the songs are really lacking lyrically but the overall pop production made it sound even worse imo. Sure, it could've been fucked up if it had been produced by someone else (I'm not a fan of S/T's production for other reasons). But for more reasons to dislike BO'B, including his production values, go to the BO'B scapegoat thread.
Cleverman wrote:Also, I suddenly have this fear that the Ontario soundcheck tune won't even be on the new album! I mighta missed it, but has there been confirmation that song is indeed Sirens or will be on the album?
It's just a guess that the soundcheck song is 'Sirens', but BO'B has said that a song called 'Sirens' will be on there. Was it a soundchecked live song, or a studio version played on loud speakers, we don't know, but no one recognises it so there's reason to believe it's a song by Pearl Jam. Why the 'sudden fear' it won't be on there?
Okay, fair enough. I'll have to look through that thread because I always look at a rock producer like how people have the old saying about an NFL quarterback (paraphrasing): Too much credit when the team wins, too much blame when the team loses. Now a hip hop or boy band producer, they're way more involved in the sound of a record, and anyway i quite like the sound of BO'B's other PJ records (No Code and Yield specifically).

As for the sudden fear, I don't know, but of the three new songs we know (or are at least pretty sure) will be on the new album, I really like one (MYM), think one is pretty good (LB) and am really ugh, meh on the other (FD), but the soundcheck song seemed to be more in line (granted, it's not a good recording) with my selfish needs as a fan (big fan of NAIS, Sleight of Hand, PT, etc) and I guess it would figure that it wouldn't be on Lightning Bolt.
The short story: a lot has been said about BO'B's tastes and techniques as a producer changing as he's got older, as well as how 'hands on' he is in recording, not only in his producer role but also in the fact that he wants to be part of the process of songwriting and arrangement as well. That clearly was detrimental to Backspacer. We also have quotes from the band (well, Ed) about how they didn't used to listen to a lot of what he said, whereas now (during Backspacer) they've chosen to. Again, the evidence is there to be heard, where several of PJ's tendencies were chopped and neutered and the songs were transformed into a more 'palatable' pop-orientated version of themselves. So many of us here think that all of BO'B-mixed albums you like (and we all do) were created in spite of BO'B's 'hands on' tendencies, not because of them, because PJ didn't used to go with all of his ideas. The reason I'm clutching at straws is that it's possible PJ got a bit miffed about O'Brien's 'managerial' direction again for the new album, and didn't want a Backspacer II follow up, so they abandoned recording, wrote new songs, and wanted to be present for the mixing.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
iceagecoming
A Return To Form
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:13 am
Location: Saint Petersburg

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by iceagecoming »

What exact evidence do we have of him influencing songwriting on Backspacer? The only two I can think of are on Unthought Known and Just Breathe where he gave both songs a double chorus (or peak in the case of UK). Both of those are legit suggestions that the band easily could've refused.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

I don't want to really go fishing through four years of evidence, sorry. Ed gave an interview saying that they didn't want to refuse BO'B's suggestions anymore. So yeah, could have, but didn't.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

I don't really know any of this for a fact; if we did, there'd be no point in me positing any of it. Mindless speculation is what it is.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Cleverman
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 317
Joined: Tue July 16, 2013 8:49 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Cleverman »

Okay, I do recall the Ed quote. Yeah, here's hoping that LB isn't BS 2. I didn't love it, but if stands as their lone attempt at a bright, poppy album, and LB is something else entirely, I will be a little more at peace with it.

Moreover, if the band actually released b-sides like they used to, we could get a better feel for that particular era. Like, can you imagine Vs without Crazy Mary or Yield without Leatherman?
Satisfaction is the death of desire.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by @SkitchP »

Cleverman wrote:Okay, I do recall the Ed quote. Yeah, here's hoping that LB isn't BS 2. I didn't love it, but if stands as their lone attempt at a bright, poppy album, and LB is something else entirely, I will be a little more at peace with it.

Moreover, if the band actually released b-sides like they used to, we could get a better feel for that particular era. Like, can you imagine Vs without Crazy Mary or Yield without Leatherman?

Both eras would be a little bit better?
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

:lol:

But I like Crazy Mary and Leatherman. The line "Take a bottle drink it down, pass it around" represents the last year I was really passionate about PJ (2006).
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Lament »

harmless wrote:Also, I just spotted this in the BO'B interview that I didn't notice before.

I think we mixed everything in Seattle. They wanted to mix up there because they all wanted to be around. It takes a little longer when everybody is around. I say a "little longer," but It probably took 10 days. That's not a long time for some people, but that seems like a long time to me.

Where they not around for all the mixing last time? That's what this seems to imply (and also that it took longer than BO'B might've hoped...). If they weren't present during the mixing of Backspacer, and they insisted that they should be present this time, maybe it's because they were relatively unhappy with the pop sound. It's only mindless speculation but it's possible, no?
To be fair, he just says they ALL wanted to be around. I highly doubt BO'B mixed Backspacer alone (I'm sure Ed was present at the very least). Also, it's not like when he finished mixing it they weren't able to ask him to make changes before it was mastered.

(And if they did let him mix it and then send it off to be mastered without listening to it? Well then they care even less than even the most cynical posters claim they do...)
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by @SkitchP »

harmless wrote::lol:

But I like Crazy Mary and Leatherman. The line "Take a bottle drink it down, pass it around" represents the last year I was really passionate about PJ (2006).
I like leatherman, and crazy mary is okay live occasionally. I really dislike the studio crazy mary.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46251
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by BurtReynolds »

wasn't it just him and ed last time?
RM's resident disinformation expert.
Post Reply