Brexit
- bune
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9359
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
- Location: Washington State
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
- LetMeSleep
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 17987
- Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Scooby Doo
Re: Brexit
Theresa May gives us a glimpse of what it'd be like to be a tofu salesperson.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Brexit
There's a great article in the Guardian today by Fintan O'Toole who argues that Brexit is about the continuing fragmentation of the United Kingdom which has manifested itself in Brexit:
[Quoute]For all of this is the afterlife of dead things. One of them is Brexit itself. When did Brextinction occur? On 24 June 2016. The project was driven by decades of camped-up mendacity about the tyranny of the EU, and sold in the referendum as a fantasy of national liberation. It simply could not survive contact with reality. It died the moment it became real. You cannot free yourself from imaginary oppression. Even if May were a political genius – and let us concede that she is not – Brexit was always going to come down to a choice between two evils: the heroic but catastrophic failure of crashing out; or the unheroic but less damaging failure of swapping first-class for second-class EU membership. These are the real afterlives of a departed reverie.
If the choice between shooting oneself in the head or in the foot is the answer to Britain’s long-term problems, surely the wrong question is being asked. It is becoming ever clearer that Brexit is not about its ostensible subject: Britain’s relationship with the EU. The very word Brexit contains a literally unspoken truth. It does not include or even allude to Europe. It is British exit that is the point, not what it is exiting from. The tautologous slogan Leave Means Leave is similarly (if unintentionally) honest: the meaning is in the leaving, not in what is being left or how.....
It may seem strange to call this slow collapse invisible since so much of it is obvious: the deep uncertainties about the union after the Good Friday agreement of 1998 and the establishment of the Scottish parliament the following year; the consequent rise of English nationalism; the profound regional inequalities within England itself; the generational divergence of values and aspirations; the undermining of the welfare state and its promise of shared citizenship; the contempt for the poor and vulnerable expressed through austerity; the rise of a sensationally self-indulgent and clownish ruling class. But the collective effects of these interrelated developments do seem to have been barely visible within the political mainstream until David Cameron accidentally took the lid off by calling a referendum and asking people to endorse the status quo.[/Quote]
I think he's bang on with his assessment here. In the short term, Brexit needs to be cancelled but the underlying causes must also be dealt with. And that will never happen in face it’ll come to a violent head unless this whole shambles is called off somehow.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... or-purpose
[Quoute]For all of this is the afterlife of dead things. One of them is Brexit itself. When did Brextinction occur? On 24 June 2016. The project was driven by decades of camped-up mendacity about the tyranny of the EU, and sold in the referendum as a fantasy of national liberation. It simply could not survive contact with reality. It died the moment it became real. You cannot free yourself from imaginary oppression. Even if May were a political genius – and let us concede that she is not – Brexit was always going to come down to a choice between two evils: the heroic but catastrophic failure of crashing out; or the unheroic but less damaging failure of swapping first-class for second-class EU membership. These are the real afterlives of a departed reverie.
If the choice between shooting oneself in the head or in the foot is the answer to Britain’s long-term problems, surely the wrong question is being asked. It is becoming ever clearer that Brexit is not about its ostensible subject: Britain’s relationship with the EU. The very word Brexit contains a literally unspoken truth. It does not include or even allude to Europe. It is British exit that is the point, not what it is exiting from. The tautologous slogan Leave Means Leave is similarly (if unintentionally) honest: the meaning is in the leaving, not in what is being left or how.....
It may seem strange to call this slow collapse invisible since so much of it is obvious: the deep uncertainties about the union after the Good Friday agreement of 1998 and the establishment of the Scottish parliament the following year; the consequent rise of English nationalism; the profound regional inequalities within England itself; the generational divergence of values and aspirations; the undermining of the welfare state and its promise of shared citizenship; the contempt for the poor and vulnerable expressed through austerity; the rise of a sensationally self-indulgent and clownish ruling class. But the collective effects of these interrelated developments do seem to have been barely visible within the political mainstream until David Cameron accidentally took the lid off by calling a referendum and asking people to endorse the status quo.[/Quote]
I think he's bang on with his assessment here. In the short term, Brexit needs to be cancelled but the underlying causes must also be dealt with. And that will never happen in face it’ll come to a violent head unless this whole shambles is called off somehow.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... or-purpose
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Brexit
Yeah I’m not sure May cares, Mary Lou, but waving Irish unity at her isn’t helping either.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- surfndestroy
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2870
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:21 am
Re: Brexit
The Brexit process has been an unmitigated disaster but I so don't agree with this assessment. Canada, part of the Commonwealth but not EU in no way thinks their trade agreements with EU or any other country or group makes Canada second-class anything.dimejinky99 wrote:"Brexit was always going to come down to a choice between two evils: the heroic but catastrophic failure of crashing out; or the unheroic but less damaging failure of swapping first-class for second-class EU membership."
It's like telling a person who wants a divorce but also to maintain a good relationship with their ex for child raising reasons, that they will only be a second-class person. Pfft.
Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Brexit
The commonwealth is just a ragged threadbare label for former glories and countries under their dominion. There’s no social or economic interaction or process among the commonwealth in fact the name is utterly misleading.
Being from a commonwealth country doesn’t give you access or a free green card into England.
*im wrong on the social aspect. Its celebrated as a sports event every four years. The commonwealth games. But that’s it.
Being from a commonwealth country doesn’t give you access or a free green card into England.
*im wrong on the social aspect. Its celebrated as a sports event every four years. The commonwealth games. But that’s it.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29574
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Brexit
the queen occasionally visits canada
she is their head of state
constitutional monarchy
canadians can work in the UK
she is their head of state
constitutional monarchy
canadians can work in the UK
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16264
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: Brexit
96583UP wrote:constitutional monarchy
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Brexit
One of the richest people in the world who lives off and costs tens of millions in benefits provided by the British tax payer each year. Yeah she’s a real treasure 
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- doone
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 3404
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:17 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: right there
Re: Brexit
dimejinky99 wrote:One of the richest people in the world who lives off and costs tens of millions in benefits provided by the British tax payer each year. Yeah she’s a real treasure
Lol, she's not even one of the richest people in her country.Media reports have estimated the Queen's personal fortune is worth up to £360 million ($470 million). That's a nice chunk of change, but over 320 Brits are richer, according to the Sunday Times.
bada wrote:Cause the two girls on the board voted for the rapey song.
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29574
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Brexit
the other 320 are just Russia and Chinese money-launderers with British passportsdoone wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:One of the richest people in the world who lives off and costs tens of millions in benefits provided by the British tax payer each year. Yeah she’s a real treasureLol, she's not even one of the richest people in her country.Media reports have estimated the Queen's personal fortune is worth up to £360 million ($470 million). That's a nice chunk of change, but over 320 Brits are richer, according to the Sunday Times.
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- Anders
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 23453
- Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
- Location: Oslo, Norway
Re: Brexit
Still, she lives for free, woth a huge income every year. And:
The Crown Estate has 263,000 farmed acres; billions of dollars in industrial, office, and retail properties; about half of the U.K.’s shoreline, and almost all the seabed to the 12-mile territorial limit. The total value is about $16.5 billion. Queen Elizabeth and family receive 15% of all the money — $363 million annually — made from the rents, lumber, agricultural products, minerals, renewable energy production, licensing of rights to run undersea cables, and more.
The Crown Estate has 263,000 farmed acres; billions of dollars in industrial, office, and retail properties; about half of the U.K.’s shoreline, and almost all the seabed to the 12-mile territorial limit. The total value is about $16.5 billion. Queen Elizabeth and family receive 15% of all the money — $363 million annually — made from the rents, lumber, agricultural products, minerals, renewable energy production, licensing of rights to run undersea cables, and more.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Brexit
doone wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:One of the richest people in the world who lives off and costs tens of millions in benefits provided by the British tax payer each year. Yeah she’s a real treasureLol, she's not even one of the richest people in her country.Media reports have estimated the Queen's personal fortune is worth up to £360 million ($470 million). That's a nice chunk of change, but over 320 Brits are richer, according to the Sunday Times.
Vast and truly vast amounts of money involved in all sorts of other things and off shore for the most part as Anders pointed out. None of it officially declared.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: Brexit
dimejinky99 wrote:Brexit needs to be cancelled
Didn't the EU say they wouldn't allow Britain to back out right after the vote passed or is that not enforceable?
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37328
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Brexit
i might be wrong but i think the original rules said britain couldn't back out unless the rest of the eu ok'd it, but later they waved that rule and now britain can decide on their own to cancelbada wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:Brexit needs to be cancelled
Didn't the EU say they wouldn't allow Britain to back out right after the vote passed or is that not enforceable?
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Brexit
Any sensible leader would cancel it. May is barrelling ahead and only last night called all EU leaders and it seems they’re all flummoxed as she seems to have hardened to go ahead with it no matter what. She knows the EU won’t budge. She therefore can’t appease the endless demands and complaints from within her own party and the others.
It’s looking like a hard brexit right now.
No time left for a second referendum. A deal within Britain impossible.
She could possibly cancel A50 but looks like she’s charging ahead. Simply to keep her party together. Which is pointless given there’s going to be huge splits and upheavel across all parties and strands after it happens.
No clear idea what she thinks she’s doing.
It’s looking like a hard brexit right now.
No time left for a second referendum. A deal within Britain impossible.
She could possibly cancel A50 but looks like she’s charging ahead. Simply to keep her party together. Which is pointless given there’s going to be huge splits and upheavel across all parties and strands after it happens.
No clear idea what she thinks she’s doing.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: Brexit
cutuphalfdead wrote:i might be wrong but i think the original rules said britain couldn't back out unless the rest of the eu ok'd it, but later they waved that rule and now britain can decide on their own to cancelbada wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:Brexit needs to be cancelled
Didn't the EU say they wouldn't allow Britain to back out right after the vote passed or is that not enforceable?
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Brexit
Wow. So Mays plan b is to try negotiate a separate deal with Ireland on customs and the border. EU member states can’t negotiate on these and why would they?
She’s away with the fairies completely.
She’s away with the fairies completely.
Calibrate your enthusiasm