Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Rate S/T

5 Stars
11
19%
4 Stars
19
33%
3 Stars
26
46%
2 Stars
0
No votes
1 Star
1
2%
 
Total votes: 57

User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Kevin Davis »

Blaine Ryan wrote:Maybe I just don't have an ear for this kind of stuff...
You're not alone.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

Maybe we’re hard of hearing?

I know I was after first listening to it. ST is so harsh on the old ears
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
Brett
AnalLog
Posts: 1606
Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 5:30 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Brett »

dimejinky99 wrote:Whey can’t everything sound like no code? Or vitalogy?

And it’s the same producer even!


Bloody Brendan O Brien. Can’t even remember his good settings on a board.
Brendan didn't produce it, though. It was engineered by Adam Kasper, and produced by him with assistance from the band. Or are you referring to the remix?
Huell
A Return To Form
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon September 16, 2013 10:51 am

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Huell »

Always think that is so strange when Riot Act is so sweetly produced and engineered. It’s everything Avocado isn’t... the 2017 mix is a big improvement, not just adding bass back in
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37328
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Norah »

It's all The Woods fault.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

cutuphalfdead wrote:It's all The Woods fault.
true.
Ed wanted to be as loud as SK was in the first song from TW.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by bodysnatcher »

Huell wrote:Always think that is so strange when Riot Act is so sweetly produced and engineered. It’s everything Avocado isn’t... the 2017 mix is a big improvement, not just adding bass back in

it kind of makes sense in the context of the time it was released. we were smack-dab in the middle of the iPod revolution. Sure, Riot Act was released during the iPod-period too, but the devices weren't nearly as ubiquitous as they were in 2005-2006. a tidal shift was happening with how people consumed music... on tiny little earbuds that sounded like shit. not only that, but you're dealing with music files that look completely different than how they looked even in the 90s (even MORE compressed!). producers were wrapping their heads around how to make music sound better on these. there was no tried-and-true, objective method. especially older producers, like B'oB who had been around for a while and used more traditional methods of making a record. producers, bands, and labels were chasing the money. obviously people were still listening to physical music, but it wasn't the carrot they were still chasing. they could see the future, and it wasn't physical.

i liken it to a how traditional photographer might have adapted to the digital photography revolution. they were used to film and a very manual process of developing it. they knew how manipulate film in the development process to get the exact results they wanted. they were masters. then, suddenly, digital photography takes off. no longer were they in pitch black rooms developing film, then moving to manually printing on paper. their techniques, in a large sense, were no longer needed. they had to learn a whole new system to stay modern. of course, now, there are still old-school traditional photographers, just like there are still old-school analog producers. you now have earbuds that sound incredible. headphones that sound incredible. uncompressed digital audio is a bigger thing. and this is where a client or artist gets to make their decisions based on the results they are after.
Huell
A Return To Form
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon September 16, 2013 10:51 am

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Huell »

Definitely agree with everything you said but I also think you start to hear where songs are no longer jammed out. They write alone and the hammer out an idea. Avocado songs don’t have a feel that the band are bouncing off each other except for something like Severed Hand. That’s why Marker in the Sand isn’t quite the rock and roll song they pulled off with ease. A bit off topic but the best example of an album changing like this is the KOL album with Sex on Fire etc, the band dynamic is gone and it’s short burst of making do with what you have.

For whatever reason Backspacer is an anomaly in their catalogue for me, the bass and drums click for so many of those songs. It’s peculia because it doesn’t sound jammy
User avatar
Fuzzcharger
Jeff's Infallible Pendulum
Posts: 1919
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 2:06 am
Location: Australia

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Fuzzcharger »

VinylGuy wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:It's all The Woods fault.
true.
Ed wanted to be as loud as SK was in the first song from TW.

Oh really? I mean I love the woods but that was a bit more lofi vibe push with performance volume not so much mastering the shit out of it. I'll have to try find a link with this info.

Also #teamspotifymix

Because I have such shit hearing problems I've significantly noticed the 2017 mix/master is a lot less harsh than the original.
Lament wrote: Like I always say, "Anyone who thinks getting kicked in the nuts by one person sucks has never gotten kicked in the nuts by two people at the same time."
User avatar
Hatfield
AnalLog
Posts: 1512
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 8:54 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Hatfield »

Been listening to a lot of the 2006 tour lately and it reminds me how much I love this record. I'm all in agreement with the sound (and the remix is awesome), but just wanted to state how much I love this group of songs. ie. A song like Army Reserve coming on the heels of Betterman at the Gorge is so perfect. Those songs brought a lot to that tour.
User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

Blaine Ryan wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
Blaine Ryan wrote:Maybe this belongs in the "unpopular Pearl Jam opinions" thread, but I've never really had a problem with how this album sounds...
Blaine!
I mean, it doesn't sound great, but if everyone didn't make such a big fuss about it I would never have guessed there was an issue. People say the same thing about Accelerate and I also think that album sounds fine.

Maybe I just don't have an ear for this kind of stuff...
Well previous to that, the albums all has dynamics, space and guts. Avocado is loud, compressed and congested. It's flat and limp-dicked. All you have to do is compare them.

Of course, it doesn't make any difference to me anyway because the songs suck and I never listen to it.
User avatar
Superblood Wolfmoon
AnalLog
Posts: 1867
Joined: Thu November 21, 2013 10:01 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Superblood Wolfmoon »

Been a while since I've listened to this one...goddamn what a good album. The band is loose and groovy, Eddie's in top form, and McCready rips. Great batch of tunes.
I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd.
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Coach »

I still very much enjoy WWS, Severed Hand, Marker and Life Wasted.

Still think SH is one of the band's most underrated songs
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

yeah, i like avocado a lot.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Superblood Wolfmoon
AnalLog
Posts: 1867
Joined: Thu November 21, 2013 10:01 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Superblood Wolfmoon »

Severed Hand is easily top 5 PJ for me.
I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84855
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by epilogue »

Severed Hand is so great.
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Bammer »

bodysnatcher wrote:
Huell wrote:Always think that is so strange when Riot Act is so sweetly produced and engineered. It’s everything Avocado isn’t... the 2017 mix is a big improvement, not just adding bass back in

it kind of makes sense in the context of the time it was released. we were smack-dab in the middle of the iPod revolution. Sure, Riot Act was released during the iPod-period too, but the devices weren't nearly as ubiquitous as they were in 2005-2006. a tidal shift was happening with how people consumed music... on tiny little earbuds that sounded like shit. not only that, but you're dealing with music files that look completely different than how they looked even in the 90s (even MORE compressed!). producers were wrapping their heads around how to make music sound better on these. there was no tried-and-true, objective method. especially older producers, like B'oB who had been around for a while and used more traditional methods of making a record. producers, bands, and labels were chasing the money. obviously people were still listening to physical music, but it wasn't the carrot they were still chasing. they could see the future, and it wasn't physical.

i liken it to a how traditional photographer might have adapted to the digital photography revolution. they were used to film and a very manual process of developing it. they knew how manipulate film in the development process to get the exact results they wanted. they were masters. then, suddenly, digital photography takes off. no longer were they in pitch black rooms developing film, then moving to manually printing on paper. their techniques, in a large sense, were no longer needed. they had to learn a whole new system to stay modern. of course, now, there are still old-school traditional photographers, just like there are still old-school analog producers. you now have earbuds that sound incredible. headphones that sound incredible. uncompressed digital audio is a bigger thing. and this is where a client or artist gets to make their decisions based on the results they are after.
Your analogy is lacking any mention of wet plate.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

Listening to Army Reserve live now...and Inside Job.

Mike :heartbeat: :heartbeat: :heartbeat:
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 4:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16265
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread

Post by Birds in Hell »

BO'B's remix of S/T managed the unbelievable, making an already-bad sounding record sound somehow even worse. I'm convinced his ears are completely shot. If it's not that, he's definitely lost his touch in the digital world.

The only good sounding version of S/T is the dynamic mastering of the (superior) original mix which somehow wound up on Spotify.
Post Reply