Star Trek Awesomeness

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by bada »

Image
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by bada »

Image
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by bada »

Image
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by bada »

Image
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by bune »

wild.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by McParadigm »

bune wrote: wild.
Image
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by bada »

Berman is a notorious sexist. He's almost single-handedly responsible for driving off Terry Farrell from DS9. He'd repeatedly tell her that her breasts weren't big enough for TV, etc. He's a monster.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by bada »

Wow there is a ton of stuff out there about what a ass Berman is...its great.
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by bune »

bada wrote:
Berman is a notorious sexist. He's almost single-handedly responsible for driving off Terry Farrell from DS9. He'd repeatedly tell her that her breasts weren't big enough for TV, etc. He's a monster.
How is that even a statement. She's basically the reason I watched the show.
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by bune »

Image
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by bada »

Image
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40175
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by wease »

bada wrote:Image
Pod Wil Wheaton. Always the bridesmaid, never the bride.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by McParadigm »

Say yes to the Wes
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by McParadigm »

I’ll show myself out
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by bada »

Image
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by dimejinky99 »

Did not know this. I love Lucy


Lucille Ball saved Star Trek not once, but twice. She owned the production company Desilu Productions which was then bought by CBS.

She approved the production and development of the first Star Trek pilot, even though her board of directors rejected it. After it got very negative reviews, she helped finance the second pilot with her own money!
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45826
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by BurtReynolds »

thread:
wow...
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by bune »

yeah, I'm on board with that.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by McParadigm »

That’s dumb as hell.

One of the biggest constraints they had early in the show, and one of the reasons they struggled in the first two seasons, was that Roddenberry in his old age had decided that interpersonal conflict wouldn’t exist by this point in the future. He didn’t want them to fight with each other...ever. They cut him out of the movies after the first one because every note he sent was “they shouldn’t be arguing etc.” They couldn’t cut him out of the tv show.

He wanted Wesley crusher to exist because in his mind, Wesley was him as a young man. Smart, a little bit socially alone, but getting to live young Gene’s fantasy of being in space. Wesley is HIS creation, his casting choice, his idealized creation of himself, and he wanted the captain to be played by...Yaphet Kotto

Image
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Star Trek Awesomeness

Post by McParadigm »

I think it’s far more likely that Picard was supposed to leave or die after the first couple of seasons, and Riker would take over the ship. He more fits the traditional Star Trek captain mold, and all the way back when phase 2 was in development they planned on doing exactly that. Kirk would run the ship for a while, Will Drecker would be his second in command, and then Kirk would leave and become an admiral who guest stars from time to time.
(patriotic choking noises)
Post Reply