ok AM probably weren't the best choice but it was what i was currently listening to. heavy riffs and dark atmosphere courtsey of josh homme, fuck yeah i love that shit. but yes there are better bands out there.harmless wrote:There is absolutely nothing original about even their most inventive songs. So in that sense, they're a good comparison with PJ.
Lightning Bolt: the official album thread
- lecherouslittlestump
- known prankster
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 10:39 am
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
"A man who doesn't spend time with the Jamily can never be a real man," - Don Corelone
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Well, it's not spot on until it's happened, but I can relate to his pessimism. All I'm saying is I hate the "PJ should be doing what (insert shitty band here) is doing" argument. It invalidates the whole post.Heathen wrote:They do suck but other than that his description of LB and its reception seems spot on.harmless wrote:Is that what that is? The problem is, they suck.lecherouslittlestump wrote:if you want interesting/challenging music, then listen to the endless younger bands out there that are making vital exciting music like vitalogy and no code. my pick? arctic monkeys, they're going through their "anti commercial experimental no code" phase.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- lecherouslittlestump
- known prankster
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 10:39 am
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
this entire thread is about what pj 'should' be doing. which would be some bizzare psychedelic space rock album written by stone gossardharmless wrote:Well, it's not spot on until it's happened, but I can relate to his pessimism. All I'm saying is I hate the "PJ should be doing what (insert shitty band here) is doing" argument. It invalidates the whole post.Heathen wrote:They do suck but other than that his description of LB and its reception seems spot on.harmless wrote:Is that what that is? The problem is, they suck.lecherouslittlestump wrote:if you want interesting/challenging music, then listen to the endless younger bands out there that are making vital exciting music like vitalogy and no code. my pick? arctic monkeys, they're going through their "anti commercial experimental no code" phase.
"A man who doesn't spend time with the Jamily can never be a real man," - Don Corelone
- Lament
- Commissioner
- Posts: 11792
- Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
I don't look at what young artists are doing and wish Pearl Jam were more like them. I do sometimes look at other older artists and wish Pearl Jam were in a similar place to said other acts, though.harmless wrote:All I'm saying is I hate the "PJ should be doing what (insert shitty band here) is doing" argument. It invalidates the whole post.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
I can agree with that. No, my issue isn't that you're talking about what PJ should be doing (that's one of my favourite things to do), just that you used a band I don't like to do it.lecherouslittlestump wrote:this entire thread is about what pj 'should' be doing. which would be some bizzare psychedelic space rock album written by stone gossardharmless wrote:Well, it's not spot on until it's happened, but I can relate to his pessimism. All I'm saying is I hate the "PJ should be doing what (insert shitty band here) is doing" argument. It invalidates the whole post.Heathen wrote:They do suck but other than that his description of LB and its reception seems spot on.harmless wrote:Is that what that is? The problem is, they suck.lecherouslittlestump wrote:if you want interesting/challenging music, then listen to the endless younger bands out there that are making vital exciting music like vitalogy and no code. my pick? arctic monkeys, they're going through their "anti commercial experimental no code" phase.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Me too. But I'll be honest; when they were a little younger, I looked at other bands of the same age and thought PJ could be cooler, like them. It's something I've always done and I'm still doing. When they released Yield, Binaural, Riot Act... I had the same feeling. Yeah, I really like it, but wow, they're different; they're kind of mature and 'classic rock' and shit, and that's not very cool. It's almost as if they're just doing what they always did, but because they're actually *old* now, it sucks. When it could be argued that what they are now is, in a way, a logical extension of what they were.Lament wrote:I don't look at what young artists are doing and wish Pearl Jam were more like them. I do sometimes look at other older artists and wish Pearl Jam were in a similar place to said other acts, though.harmless wrote:All I'm saying is I hate the "PJ should be doing what (insert shitty band here) is doing" argument. It invalidates the whole post.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Basically, take Tom Waits for example. Have PJ *ever* been Tom Waits? No way. They've never been that intelligent or inventive, even at their best moments.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- Lament
- Commissioner
- Posts: 11792
- Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
See, what's weird is that when Pearl Jam was younger, a lot of times I found myself looking at my other favorite acts and wishing they were more like Pearl Jam. It's very odd to me how much the tables have turned in the last decade.harmless wrote:Me too. But I'll be honest; when they were a little younger, I looked at other bands of the same age and thought PJ could be cooler, like them. It's something I've always done and I'm still doing. When they released Yield, Binaural, Riot Act... I had the same feeling. Yeah, I really like it, but wow, they're different; they're kind of mature and 'classic rock' and shit, and that's not very cool. It's almost as if they're just doing what they always did, but because they're actually *old* now, it sucks. When it could be argued that what they are now is, in a way, a logical extension of what they were.Lament wrote:I don't look at what young artists are doing and wish Pearl Jam were more like them. I do sometimes look at other older artists and wish Pearl Jam were in a similar place to said other acts, though.harmless wrote:All I'm saying is I hate the "PJ should be doing what (insert shitty band here) is doing" argument. It invalidates the whole post.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
It's not like I wanted PJ to be like other bands. I just recognised that they weren't. They did their own thing, and even then, it wasn't 'cool'. This band hasn't been 'cool' in the public eye since Vitalogy. They were always goofballs who admitted to worshipping The Who. They were a classic rock band trapped in a young 'hard rock' band's bodies.Lament wrote:See, what's weird is that when Pearl Jam was younger, a lot of times I found myself looking at my other favorite acts and wishing they were more like Pearl Jam. It's very odd to me how much the tables have turned in the last decade.harmless wrote:Me too. But I'll be honest; when they were a little younger, I looked at other bands of the same age and thought PJ could be cooler, like them. It's something I've always done and I'm still doing. When they released Yield, Binaural, Riot Act... I had the same feeling. Yeah, I really like it, but wow, they're different; they're kind of mature and 'classic rock' and shit, and that's not very cool. It's almost as if they're just doing what they always did, but because they're actually *old* now, it sucks. When it could be argued that what they are now is, in a way, a logical extension of what they were.Lament wrote:I don't look at what young artists are doing and wish Pearl Jam were more like them. I do sometimes look at other older artists and wish Pearl Jam were in a similar place to said other acts, though.harmless wrote:All I'm saying is I hate the "PJ should be doing what (insert shitty band here) is doing" argument. It invalidates the whole post.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- Lament
- Commissioner
- Posts: 11792
- Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
At the time I appreciated that, though. They seemed to conduct their career with a heavy consideration of how certain things would look in retrospect, and as a kid who loved rock mythology, I really admired this. But now that, as you put it earlier, they ARE old men, playing the role of old men has really painted them into a corner. There weren't enough stark departures along the way to put them in a spot where they could REALLY make any kind of album they want. That's great for some people, and I can't knock Pearl Jam for wanting to make Pearl Jam records, but at the same time I can't help but wonder if they'd forced themselves out of their comfort zone a bit more when they were younger if they'd feel like they were able to do more now as an older band.harmless wrote:It's not like I wanted PJ to be like other bands. I just recognised that they weren't. They did their own thing, and even then, it wasn't 'cool'. This band hasn't been 'cool' in the public eye since Vitalogy. They were always goofballs who admitted to worshipping The Who. They were a classic rock band trapped in a young 'hard rock' band's bodies.
Then again, I'm not sure they'd even want to. Stip talked earlier about older bands lacking a singular vision, and I think that's true. That's something I wish Pearl Jam had now, but probably never actually did, even when they were younger. Regardless of what you think of the quality of their music, bands like U2 or R.E.M. at the very least seem to still be able to operate behind a single vision. When that vision was strong made for some excellent late career work (in my opinion).
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
- pnjguy
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 5:02 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Whoever's heading the official Pearl Jam twitter account, please stop.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
I agree with everything you say here. Collapse into Now is the best record a band could hope to end on, I think.Lament wrote:At the time I appreciated that, though. They seemed to conduct their career with a heavy consideration of how certain things would look in retrospect, and as a kid who loved rock mythology, I really admired this. But now that, as you put it earlier, they ARE old men, playing the role of old men has really painted them into a corner. There weren't enough stark departures along the way to put them in a spot where they could REALLY make any kind of album they want. That's great for some people, and I can't knock Pearl Jam for wanting to make Pearl Jam records, but at the same time I can't help but wonder if they'd forced themselves out of their comfort zone a bit more when they were younger if they'd feel like they were able to do more now as an older band.harmless wrote:It's not like I wanted PJ to be like other bands. I just recognised that they weren't. They did their own thing, and even then, it wasn't 'cool'. This band hasn't been 'cool' in the public eye since Vitalogy. They were always goofballs who admitted to worshipping The Who. They were a classic rock band trapped in a young 'hard rock' band's bodies.
Then again, I'm not sure they'd even want to. Stip talked earlier about older bands lacking a singular vision, and I think that's true. That's something I wish Pearl Jam had now, but probably never actually did, even when they were younger. Regardless of what you think of the quality of their music, bands like U2 or R.E.M. at the very least seem to still be able to operate behind a single vision. When that vision was strong made for some excellent late career work (in my opinion).
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- evenslow
- Stone's Bitch
- Posts: 9164
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
- Location: unnamed mental hospital
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
harmless wrote:I agree with everything you say here. Collapse into Now is the best record a band could hope to end on, I think.Lament wrote:At the time I appreciated that, though. They seemed to conduct their career with a heavy consideration of how certain things would look in retrospect, and as a kid who loved rock mythology, I really admired this. But now that, as you put it earlier, they ARE old men, playing the role of old men has really painted them into a corner. There weren't enough stark departures along the way to put them in a spot where they could REALLY make any kind of album they want. That's great for some people, and I can't knock Pearl Jam for wanting to make Pearl Jam records, but at the same time I can't help but wonder if they'd forced themselves out of their comfort zone a bit more when they were younger if they'd feel like they were able to do more now as an older band.harmless wrote:It's not like I wanted PJ to be like other bands. I just recognised that they weren't. They did their own thing, and even then, it wasn't 'cool'. This band hasn't been 'cool' in the public eye since Vitalogy. They were always goofballs who admitted to worshipping The Who. They were a classic rock band trapped in a young 'hard rock' band's bodies.
Then again, I'm not sure they'd even want to. Stip talked earlier about older bands lacking a singular vision, and I think that's true. That's something I wish Pearl Jam had now, but probably never actually did, even when they were younger. Regardless of what you think of the quality of their music, bands like U2 or R.E.M. at the very least seem to still be able to operate behind a single vision. When that vision was strong made for some excellent late career work (in my opinion).
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43458
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- WaitingForBluey
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2647
- Joined: Thu March 21, 2013 1:08 am
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/homeforbed
- Location: Pennsyltucky
- Contact:
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
So does the "official" LB promo blitz begin tomorrow with the release of the video?
theplatypus wrote:A solo is when the guitar goes twiddly diddly
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Quick, someone adjust the countdown clock to factor that in.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
bluestate wrote:So does the "official" LB promo blitz begin tomorrow with the release of the video?
Interesting idea. Could well be.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43458
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
bluestate wrote:So does the "official" LB promo blitz begin tomorrow with the release of the video?
the LB video followed by a stone video talking about it.
" well, its a video from us, classic pearl jam"
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
"Well, you know when I said 'Sounds like Pearl Jam?' Well this video, it looks like Lightning Bolt."
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.