MLB

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

In an era when you have nearly half the league on revenue sharing welfare that aren’t even attempting to win games and are profitable from TV money alone before the season even starts.
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22817
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: MLB

Post by Bammer »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:
Bammer wrote:
numbers wrote:I am growing more angry about this situation every day.
I am not. The money is insane. Hopefully this means it is coming back down to earth.
The money is not coming back down to earth, more of it is being shifted from the players the owners.
numbers gets it
:idea:
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
Biff Pocoroba
TIER 1 Essential Critical Infrastructure Worker
Posts: 4801
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:08 pm
Location: 5th floor, Bay 7, position 5740

Re: MLB

Post by Biff Pocoroba »

With pitchers & catchers starting to report have their been *any* major hot stove news? To echo what others are saying MLB is losing the off season.
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Electromatic »

Biff Pocoroba wrote:With pitchers & catchers starting to report have their been *any* major hot stove news? To echo what others are saying MLB is losing the off season.
They aren’t buying stadiums, they aren’t paying players.... ticket prices should come way down to reflect expenses right?
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21693
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: MLB

Post by Simple Torture »

McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15608
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

so there is a really good article in deadspin (i know, i typically hate it too) about how teams are treating the luxury tax as a hard cap, and how that is driving a lot of what we're seeing today. teams say that it's not a function of teams not being able to afford free agents, but rather teams being penalized for spending too much (which is an argument that they've been wanting to make since 1985 when they tried for the first time to get a hard cap).

https://deadspin.com/mlbs-luxury-tax-be ... 1832200596
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: MLB

Post by verb_to_trust »

The problem with signing the big name free agents in baseball is the teams almost always regret it in the end when the player is aging, and even at peak production it's not as if someone like Bryce Harper can single handedly win you games like an NBA star or elite NFL QB can. Baseball is different. And boring.
Dick/Balls
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

verb_to_trust wrote:The problem with signing the big name free agents in baseball is the teams almost always regret it in the end when the player is aging, and even at peak production it's not as if someone like Bryce Harper can single handedly win you games like an NBA star or elite NFL QB can. Baseball is different. And boring.
Then shorten the time a player is under team control before he hits free agency. They have a system designed to release most players into free agency after they have peaked, especially pitchers. They want to have their cake and eat it too, keep them from free agency in the peak earning years and then hold it against them when they reach it.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

They don’t want to pay for past performance while getting a discount on present performance.
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: MLB

Post by Coach »

PHATJ wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
Call them the Expos and lets play.
Yeah and put them in Boston (bad rumor from awhile ago) as an NL team.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21693
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: MLB

Post by Simple Torture »

numbers wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:The problem with signing the big name free agents in baseball is the teams almost always regret it in the end when the player is aging, and even at peak production it's not as if someone like Bryce Harper can single handedly win you games like an NBA star or elite NFL QB can. Baseball is different. And boring.
Then shorten the time a player is under team control before he hits free agency. They have a system designed to release most players into free agency after they have peaked, especially pitchers. They want to have their cake and eat it too, keep them from free agency in the peak earning years and then hold it against them when they reach it.
I saw someone on Twitter suggest restricted free agency, which also could be a good idea that the owners might be able to get behind. Maybe push arbitration back one year for everyone, and when players hit 4 years of service time, they can sign 2-year qualifying offer sheets.

I'd also like to see something like 1/2-service-time for all players on the 40-man roster playing in the minors to negate what's being called "service time manipulation."
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37466
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

numbers wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:The problem with signing the big name free agents in baseball is the teams almost always regret it in the end when the player is aging, and even at peak production it's not as if someone like Bryce Harper can single handedly win you games like an NBA star or elite NFL QB can. Baseball is different. And boring.
Then shorten the time a player is under team control before he hits free agency. They have a system designed to release most players into free agency after they have peaked, especially pitchers. They want to have their cake and eat it too, keep them from free agency in the peak earning years and then hold it against them when they reach it.
numbers gets it
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37466
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

numbers wrote:They don’t want to pay for past performance while getting a discount on present performance.
numbers gets it
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Electromatic »

numbers wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:The problem with signing the big name free agents in baseball is the teams almost always regret it in the end when the player is aging, and even at peak production it's not as if someone like Bryce Harper can single handedly win you games like an NBA star or elite NFL QB can. Baseball is different. And boring.
Then shorten the time a player is under team control before he hits free agency. They have a system designed to release most players into free agency after they have peaked, especially pitchers. They want to have their cake and eat it too, keep them from free agency in the peak earning years and then hold it against them when they reach it.
I would guess that will come up during the next strike.

You nailed it.
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: MLB

Post by Coach »

numbers wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:The problem with signing the big name free agents in baseball is the teams almost always regret it in the end when the player is aging, and even at peak production it's not as if someone like Bryce Harper can single handedly win you games like an NBA star or elite NFL QB can. Baseball is different. And boring.
Then shorten the time a player is under team control before he hits free agency. They have a system designed to release most players into free agency after they have peaked, especially pitchers. They want to have their cake and eat it too, keep them from free agency in the peak earning years and then hold it against them when they reach it.
That kind of punishes a team for drafting good young players, but agree it would work.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

Coach wrote:
numbers wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:The problem with signing the big name free agents in baseball is the teams almost always regret it in the end when the player is aging, and even at peak production it's not as if someone like Bryce Harper can single handedly win you games like an NBA star or elite NFL QB can. Baseball is different. And boring.
Then shorten the time a player is under team control before he hits free agency. They have a system designed to release most players into free agency after they have peaked, especially pitchers. They want to have their cake and eat it too, keep them from free agency in the peak earning years and then hold it against them when they reach it.
That kind of punishes a team for drafting good young players, but agree it would work.
It would be better than the current system in which they punish the good young players.

Regardless, the far more important issue is minor league salaries.
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15608
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

philpritchard wrote:
Coach wrote:
numbers wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:The problem with signing the big name free agents in baseball is the teams almost always regret it in the end when the player is aging, and even at peak production it's not as if someone like Bryce Harper can single handedly win you games like an NBA star or elite NFL QB can. Baseball is different. And boring.
Then shorten the time a player is under team control before he hits free agency. They have a system designed to release most players into free agency after they have peaked, especially pitchers. They want to have their cake and eat it too, keep them from free agency in the peak earning years and then hold it against them when they reach it.
That kind of punishes a team for drafting good young players, but agree it would work.
It would be better than the current system in which they punish the good young players.

Regardless, the far more important issue is minor league salaries.
what, you don't think players should earn less playing professional baseball than working a drive thru at a Taco Bell?
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

I think MLB sees the MLBPA right now with weak leadership and they are gearing up for a work stoppage where they try to break the union like football.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21693
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: MLB

Post by Simple Torture »

Good choice: whether is nice, beer is good.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: MLB

Post by PHATJ »

I’m so glad Machado chose the Padres because now I’ll never have to see him play again.
Post Reply