MLB

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

rick malone wrote:More batters swinging for the fences rather than just making solid contact and going with the pitch also contributes to more foul balls.

This doesn't appear to be changing any time soon. It seems most coaches in their 30's and 40's are teaching their hitters to "swing big or go home".
Yeah, that's generally a more productive approach, so it makes sense. Velocity increases are probably a factor, too. I bet if you look into the data more the most significant change is in foul balls the other way (and maybe more straight back, too, since pitchers work up in the zone when looking for strikeouts).
User avatar
rick malone
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 900
Joined: Sun February 24, 2013 1:56 pm
Location: serious thinking laboratory

Re: MLB

Post by rick malone »

I still say put pressure on the defense and try to make contact with 2 strikes if you're not a power guy. But everyone is or thinks they are a power guy now.
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15608
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22817
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: MLB

Post by Bammer »

Does anyone have a clear favorite as far as Cactus League stadium to visit? I am going to a game this weekend but don’t really care which.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

rick malone wrote:I still say put pressure on the defense and try to make contact with 2 strikes if you're not a power guy. But everyone is or thinks they are a power guy now.
You are punished for small ball in free agency, so guys swing away.
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Electromatic »

Harper is signed in Philadelphia (per John Heyman)
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21692
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: MLB

Post by Simple Torture »

Electromatic wrote:Harper is signed in Philadelphia (per John Heyman)
13 years, 330m with no opt-outs
McParadigm wrote:lol
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Electromatic »

Simple Torture wrote:
Electromatic wrote:Harper is signed in Philadelphia (per John Heyman)
13 years, 330m with no opt-outs

Should be interesting if Mike Trout wants to go there in 2 years.
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: MLB

Post by verb_to_trust »

Giants CEO went Kraft
Dick/Balls
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22817
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: MLB

Post by Bammer »

Dude how much would Griffey make if signing a contract in his prime right now? A billion?
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21692
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: MLB

Post by Simple Torture »

Bammer wrote:Dude how much would Griffey make if signing a contract in his prime right now? A billion?
In the current market, I have to imagine it would be higher than anything we've seen so far.

In the past four seasons:

---Machado has had an average WAR of 5.8 (good for $300m over 10 years)

---Harper has had an average WAR of 4.4 (good for $330m over 13 years)

In his last four seasons in Seattle, Griffey had an average WAR of 7.6. However, he was 29 when he was traded over (was it a sign-and-trade? I can't remember), whereas Harper and Machado are both 26. Still, I think Griffey today would be looking at 8-10 years, $35m per year, easy.

Of course, they there's Trout. He's averaged a 9.2 WAR over the past four years and is 27. If the Angels were looking to offer him a market-value extension, it'd have to be more than $350m for 10, I think. Closer to $400m. There are rumors out there that the Angels might offer him a $350m extension, and I say he'd be crazy to take it.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22817
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: MLB

Post by Bammer »

Simple Torture wrote:
Bammer wrote:Dude how much would Griffey make if signing a contract in his prime right now? A billion?
In the current market, I have to imagine it would be higher than anything we've seen so far.

In the past four seasons:

---Machado has had an average WAR of 5.8 (good for $300m over 10 years)

---Harper has had an average WAR of 4.4 (good for $330m over 13 years)

In his last four seasons in Seattle, Griffey had an average WAR of 7.6. However, he was 29 when he was traded over (was it a sign-and-trade? I can't remember), whereas Harper and Machado are both 26. Still, I think Griffey today would be looking at 8-10 years, $35m per year, easy.

Of course, they there's Trout. He's averaged a 9.2 WAR over the past four years and is 27. If the Angels were looking to offer him a market-value extension, it'd have to be more than $350m for 10, I think. Closer to $400m. There are rumors out there that the Angels might offer him a $350m extension, and I say he'd be crazy to take it.
Maybe I am biased as an M’s fan, but I cannot think of another baseball who has ever had - or ever will have again - Griffey’s marketability. Let alone his on field play.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
MadTIGERmaN
AnalLog
Posts: 1646
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:12 am
Location: The Jungle

Re: MLB

Post by MadTIGERmaN »

Bammer wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
Bammer wrote:Dude how much would Griffey make if signing a contract in his prime right now? A billion?
In the current market, I have to imagine it would be higher than anything we've seen so far.

In the past four seasons:

---Machado has had an average WAR of 5.8 (good for $300m over 10 years)

---Harper has had an average WAR of 4.4 (good for $330m over 13 years)

In his last four seasons in Seattle, Griffey had an average WAR of 7.6. However, he was 29 when he was traded over (was it a sign-and-trade? I can't remember), whereas Harper and Machado are both 26. Still, I think Griffey today would be looking at 8-10 years, $35m per year, easy.

Of course, they there's Trout. He's averaged a 9.2 WAR over the past four years and is 27. If the Angels were looking to offer him a market-value extension, it'd have to be more than $350m for 10, I think. Closer to $400m. There are rumors out there that the Angels might offer him a $350m extension, and I say he'd be crazy to take it.
Maybe I am biased as an M’s fan, but I cannot think of another baseball who has ever had - or ever will have again - Griffey’s marketability. Let alone his on field play.
as an M's fan... you should be able to name 1 other guy. Just think if Ichiro came up a Mariner, and hit his free agent season here, instead of going through the posting system and coming over from Japan. Now think if he was hitting that in todays game. I think both Grif and Ichiro would dwarf Manny and Harper
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

Bammer wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
Bammer wrote:Dude how much would Griffey make if signing a contract in his prime right now? A billion?
In the current market, I have to imagine it would be higher than anything we've seen so far.

In the past four seasons:

---Machado has had an average WAR of 5.8 (good for $300m over 10 years)

---Harper has had an average WAR of 4.4 (good for $330m over 13 years)

In his last four seasons in Seattle, Griffey had an average WAR of 7.6. However, he was 29 when he was traded over (was it a sign-and-trade? I can't remember), whereas Harper and Machado are both 26. Still, I think Griffey today would be looking at 8-10 years, $35m per year, easy.

Of course, they there's Trout. He's averaged a 9.2 WAR over the past four years and is 27. If the Angels were looking to offer him a market-value extension, it'd have to be more than $350m for 10, I think. Closer to $400m. There are rumors out there that the Angels might offer him a $350m extension, and I say he'd be crazy to take it.
Maybe I am biased as an M’s fan, but I cannot think of another baseball who has ever had - or ever will have again - Griffey’s marketability. Let alone his on field play.
I don't know if Trout is as marketable as Griffey was, but the league does a terrible job of marketing its star players these days, so it's kind of hard to compare.

As a player, though, Griffey was a superstar, and he was still nowhere remotely close to as good as Trout.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

Yeah, Trout isn’t Griffey, but MLB should at least be able to make him as famous as Jared Goff.
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: MLB

Post by verb_to_trust »

What about Jay Buhner?
Dick/Balls
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21692
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: MLB

Post by Simple Torture »

I've only scratched the surface of this one, but an interesting read incoming: some writers at The Ringer got a hold of the Reds' scouting reports from 1991-2003 (over 70,000 individual reports) and are working on a series detailing how scouting was conducted on the eve of the sabermetrics era. It starts where you might expect: Reds scouts were giddy at the prospect of trading for Griffey (interesting considering the convo we just had in here about his value), and many were down on Votto when they drafted him. Excited to read more of this.

https://www.theringer.com/mlb/2019/3/4/ ... a-findings
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 48535
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: MLB

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

not sure where to post this, but pretty cool:

https://www.sbnation.com/lookit/2019/2/ ... ycle-video
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15608
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:not sure where to post this, but pretty cool:

https://www.sbnation.com/lookit/2019/2/ ... ycle-video
take it to the suburu thread
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 48535
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: MLB

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:not sure where to post this, but pretty cool:

https://www.sbnation.com/lookit/2019/2/ ... ycle-video
take it to the suburu thread
please stop harassing me
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
Post Reply