Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

May the force be with you
Post Reply

So what did you think (DcT edition)?

Best of all the films
8
9%
Better than A New Hope, Empire, the prequels, But not Jedi
2
2%
Better than A New Hope, Jedi, the prequels, but not Empire
6
7%
Better than Empire, Jedi, the Prequels, but not A New Hope
2
2%
Better than A New Hope and the prequels, but not Empire or Jedi
2
2%
Better than Empire and the prequels, but not A New Hope or Jedi
1
1%
Better than Jedi and the prequels, but not a New Hope or Empire
23
26%
As good as Empire, Jedi, and A New Hope, and better than the prequels
15
17%
Better than the prequels, but not the originals
15
17%
As good as some of the prequels
7
8%
As good as all of the prequels
2
2%
Worse than the prequels
5
6%
 
Total votes: 88

User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23452
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by Anders »

It’s not one or the other. Where a) all the old characters dominate all the new movies, and b) we get TFA and TLJ.

There are a million ways they could have chosen to make these sequels. Plenty of those options could have dealt with the OT characters in a better way. It wouldn’t be difficult.
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4133
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by blueviper »

Strat wrote:I know you and everyone wanted to see them. I know we all wanted it to be about them. Im sorry that didnt happen. But its not about them. They are there to service the new storyline and new characters. Thats it.
I'm pretty sure a lot of people in 1983 after ROTJ came out were wondering what the further adventures of Luke, Leia and Han would be.

Even discussing movies before ANH, it was what Anakin/Darth and Obi-Wan would be doing (still OT characters)


You can listen to the three hundred reasons GL had going forward with how he wanted his SW saga to work out. Standalone film. No it's three movies. No it's actually 12. No it's 9. It doesn't matter. He stated he filmed this particular time span of this saga because 1) it was doable and 2) it was the most interesting.

Star Wars is Star Wars because of what we got with the first three movies. You can expand all you want into the universe and bring dozens of new characters into the mix, but it can't hold a candle to the original adventures put forth from 77 - 83. That is Star Wars. That escapism can never be recaptured, but money talks so here we are.

We have gotten a ton of SW content but it's so bland and boring and there's nothing there but fan-fiction type junk that just happens to be under official LFL logos now.


If we go by your rules, then episodes X - XII should have Rey, Poe, Finn in secondary roles and not be "about them" . But people are wanting films or tv shows centered on these new characters. Decisions, decisions...
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4133
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by blueviper »

dimejinky99 wrote:
Strat wrote:
blueviper wrote:So we waited decades for Episode IIV, and they actually get Harrison Ford to reprise he role as Han Solo (which I would have never expected) and they craze leading up to this was stratospheric...

and we get a bigger death star (and a joke by Han about it, no less). And a near retread of ANH. That's the best they could come up with? And you get 15 seconds of mute Luke.
ITS NOT ABOUT THOSE CHARACTERS

Don’t feed the trolls, Strat

Ps I’m going out to yer mans tonight. He probably has boxes of the new one.
I’ll grab one for you and your lady if I can.
I don't really care what people call me, but being labeled a troll is pretty disingenuous. I'm not spouting contrarian opinion for the sake of riling your guys up as a joke. While a lot of my comments are negative based on what we are getting with new SW content, I think it's just as appropriate to comment about it as compared to people lauding the TLJ and Ashoka or whatever her name is.
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by Strat »

blueviper wrote:
Strat wrote:I know you and everyone wanted to see them. I know we all wanted it to be about them. Im sorry that didnt happen. But its not about them. They are there to service the new storyline and new characters. Thats it.
I'm pretty sure a lot of people in 1983 after ROTJ came out were wondering what the further adventures of Luke, Leia and Han would be.

Even discussing movies before ANH, it was what Anakin/Darth and Obi-Wan would be doing (still OT characters)


You can listen to the three hundred reasons GL had going forward with how he wanted his SW saga to work out. Standalone film. No it's three movies. No it's actually 12. No it's 9. It doesn't matter. He stated he filmed this particular time span of this saga because 1) it was doable and 2) it was the most interesting.

Star Wars is Star Wars because of what we got with the first three movies. You can expand all you want into the universe and bring dozens of new characters into the mix, but it can't hold a candle to the original adventures put forth from 77 - 83. That is Star Wars. That escapism can never be recaptured, but money talks so here we are.

We have gotten a ton of SW content but it's so bland and boring and there's nothing there but fan-fiction type junk that just happens to be under official LFL logos now.


If we go by your rules, then episodes X - XII should have Rey, Poe, Finn in secondary roles and not be "about them" . But people are wanting films or tv shows centered on these new characters. Decisions, decisions...
And the next generation who now grow up with, and are OBSESSED with rey, finn, poe, kylo etc....wil be pissed just like people like you are and around and around we go.
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23452
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by Anders »

blueviper wrote:
Strat wrote:I know you and everyone wanted to see them. I know we all wanted it to be about them. Im sorry that didnt happen. But its not about them. They are there to service the new storyline and new characters. Thats it.
I'm pretty sure a lot of people in 1983 after ROTJ came out were wondering what the further adventures of Luke, Leia and Han would be.

If we go by your rules, then episodes X - XII should have Rey, Poe, Finn in secondary roles and not be "about them" . But people are wanting films or tv shows centered on these new characters. Decisions, decisions...
In X, Finn will be killed by his son, Poe will be in a few scenes as an old General in charge of the rebels, and Rey will be in the last scene without saying a word. However, they will destroy a Death Star.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by Strat »

Its almost the same thing as being pissed at a band and other people for finally discovering them. Like they are ripping your heart out because they signed to a major label and its not longer yours anymore.
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23452
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by Anders »

Or being a fan of Pearl Jam, and hoping they one day will release another good album. But at least we've got Imagine Dragons.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by Strat »

Anders wrote:Or being a fan of Pearl Jam, and hoping they one day will release another good album. But at least we've got Imagine Dragons.
You know Imagine dragons does suck but you dont see me hammering away about them in the Other Bands forum hoping that one day they will just be good enough for me ;)
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23452
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by Anders »

No, but surely posting about Pearl Jam in a Pearl Jam debate forum, or Star Wars in a Star Wars debate forum isn't a problem, whether you like the latest product or not?

Personally, I don't think I'm that negative either. I'm a lifelong Star Wars fan, and love most of the product.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by dimejinky99 »

blueviper wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
Strat wrote:
blueviper wrote:So we waited decades for Episode IIV, and they actually get Harrison Ford to reprise he role as Han Solo (which I would have never expected) and they craze leading up to this was stratospheric...

and we get a bigger death star (and a joke by Han about it, no less). And a near retread of ANH. That's the best they could come up with? And you get 15 seconds of mute Luke.
ITS NOT ABOUT THOSE CHARACTERS

Don’t feed the trolls, Strat

Ps I’m going out to yer mans tonight. He probably has boxes of the new one.
I’ll grab one for you and your lady if I can.
I don't really care what people call me, but being labeled a troll is pretty disingenuous. I'm not spouting contrarian opinion for the sake of riling your guys up as a joke. While a lot of my comments are negative based on what we are getting with new SW content, I think it's just as appropriate to comment about it as compared to people lauding the TLJ and Ashoka or whatever her name is.

You literally posted that you have this fake account to complain about Star Wars.
You’ve said this more than once.

Forgive me but you’re just disruptive and corrosive and have nothin to add. So why bother?
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4133
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by blueviper »

dimejinky99 wrote:
blueviper wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
Strat wrote:
blueviper wrote:So we waited decades for Episode IIV, and they actually get Harrison Ford to reprise he role as Han Solo (which I would have never expected) and they craze leading up to this was stratospheric...

and we get a bigger death star (and a joke by Han about it, no less). And a near retread of ANH. That's the best they could come up with? And you get 15 seconds of mute Luke.
ITS NOT ABOUT THOSE CHARACTERS

Don’t feed the trolls, Strat

Ps I’m going out to yer mans tonight. He probably has boxes of the new one.
I’ll grab one for you and your lady if I can.
I don't really care what people call me, but being labeled a troll is pretty disingenuous. I'm not spouting contrarian opinion for the sake of riling your guys up as a joke. While a lot of my comments are negative based on what we are getting with new SW content, I think it's just as appropriate to comment about it as compared to people lauding the TLJ and Ashoka or whatever her name is.

You literally posted that you have this fake account to complain about Star Wars.
You’ve said this more than once.

Forgive me but you’re just disruptive and corrosive and have nothin to add. So why bother?
Please find where I've said this is a fake account. I assure you this is my only account and it's not fake, and it's not for trolling. I know there is a lot of joking around on these forums but if I'm being called out as a fake and a troll I'm going to stand up against that accusation, especially in this day and age where it's normal to abuse social media, of which I do not partake. I might have even used this same name on the board before it was rebooted or whatever it was.
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4133
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by blueviper »

I believe I said this is the only forum I go to to post about star wars (and pearl jam)
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

yeah I don't remember bv saying he/she was a fake account, dime. Please calm down.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by dimejinky99 »

I’m calm as a jungle mist
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by Coach »

I liked The Force Awakens but agree with Blueviper and don't think he was trolling. Most casual fans I know even thought TFA was way too familiar to the first Star Wars. So I was happy when they made a left turn with TLJ and I hope they keep pushing the limits on this and do not remake ROTJ.
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28033
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by Monkey_Driven »

Coach wrote:I liked The Force Awakens but agree with Blueviper and don't think he was trolling. Most casual fans I know even thought TFA was way too familiar to the first Star Wars. So I was happy when they made a left turn with TLJ and I hope they keep pushing the limits on this and do not remake ROTJ.
Yup.
JuanHamm
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6950
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 6:10 pm

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by JuanHamm »

Monkey_Driven wrote:
Coach wrote:I liked The Force Awakens but agree with Blueviper and don't think he was trolling. Most casual fans I know even thought TFA was way too familiar to the first Star Wars. So I was happy when they made a left turn with TLJ and I hope they keep pushing the limits on this and do not remake ROTJ.
Yup.
Agreed. The bigger death star thing came off as super lazy and was a big turn off.
Nihilist lives don't matter
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28033
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by Monkey_Driven »

It could have totally been a regular old ship or fleet and still worked from a narrative perspective. Maybe the First Order Fleet attacked and destroyed the surface of Hosnian Prime in an extraordinary display of military might. Then captured Rey and held her. The climactic battle could/should have been the small crew rescuing Rey and maybe gaining information about said fleet.
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23452
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by Anders »

TFA have some problems like Starkiller Base, poor handling of the OT characters and a few other things. It’s still a decent vehicle for taking the story further. It’s fairly funny and also well made. But I think TLJ made TFA look worse. Not by being better, but by taking poor choices with the options TFA gave it.
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)

Post by bune »

If they had not destroyed it, that would have been a better story going into the sequels. I mean, a rogue planet flying around tearing shit up? Maybe better for a second movie but still, it would have been something other than a parallel.
Post Reply