dimejinky99 wrote:In a nutshell she’s loathed by all within her own party and in Europe.
It’s not a thatcher steely determination. It’s complete intransigence she doesn’t listen to anyone ever.
None of this makes it clearer to me, because it’s about personality and not policy. And frankly, being a Conservative who is loathed by this particular group of Conservatives seems like a mark in her favor. I’m not sure they’d accept any deal that isnt legally impossible, written in crayon, and signed in blood.
Comments came out of the meetings with the EU saying she’s both completely stupid and unwilling to even listen.
Again, if she’s trying to manage a deal that will pass the House, probably everything the EU has to say is problematic for her because it is based in legal and economic realities that her party will not admit exist. What other options does she have, but to be obstinant to the point of absurdity with both sides?
Members of her own party have said the same.
They can eat my ass.
I sound like a May apologist, but I’m not. I think she lacks leadership skills sufficient to the moment (or most moments), I think she has failed terribly to address Islamophobia and stupidity within her party, and I think she would have done well for herself to get out a long time ago. But I also hear (and this may be due to an ocean between us) very few specifics from others about what exactly they would put forward in lieu of her deal, and I suspect most don’t have any better an answer themselves. I feel like “a deal exists somewhere out there that can be made with Europe and will pass the House and will be good for England etc” is a line of complete bullshit from the very start, in which case how can the lack of such a deal be her fault?