What movies are you watching?
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: What movies are you watching?
No way in hell is it a step backwards
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: What movies are you watching?
Ok, maybe not. But it’s not nearly as good as Django or IB.LoathedVermin72 wrote:No way in hell is it a step backwards
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43518
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: What movies are you watching?
Django is a piece of shit. IB is a good joke.
Jackie is his best movie by far.
Jackie is his best movie by far.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: What movies are you watching?
It’s much better than both of thoseBi_3 wrote:Ok, maybe not. But it’s not nearly as good as Django or IB.LoathedVermin72 wrote:No way in hell is it a step backwards
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20327
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: What movies are you watching?
Hateful Eight is okay... I have problems with the story, though. What's the point? It feels like QT is just masturbating... which is okay, at times. I really dislike when he 'narrates'. Also, as I stated in in another thread, I have big problems with the lighting. Not sure what they were thinking there.
- oasisfan35
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4819
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:07 pm
Re: What movies are you watching?
I feel these two efforts have been more cash-grabs than actually expanding the Conjuring (which is apparently a universe now) narrative effectively. I am hopeful that Annabelle Comes Home and The Conjuring 3 kind of right the ship but we shall see.LoathedVermin72 wrote:The Curse of La Llorona was very boring and bad. Between this and The Nun, I feel like the James Wan era of horror has hit a creative wall. We're ready for something new.
absinthe makes the heart grow fonder...
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: What movies are you watching?
They won’t. ACH looks terrible and the La Llorona guy is directing Conjuring 3.oasisfan35 wrote:I feel these two efforts have been more cash-grabs than actually expanding the Conjuring (which is apparently a universe now) narrative effectively. I am hopeful that Annabelle Comes Home and The Conjuring 3 kind of right the ship but we shall see.LoathedVermin72 wrote:The Curse of La Llorona was very boring and bad. Between this and The Nun, I feel like the James Wan era of horror has hit a creative wall. We're ready for something new.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: What movies are you watching?
If anything, I think H8 has a lot more on its mind thematically than maybe any other QT movie, and it seems way less masturbatory than what he usually does.tree_ wrote:Hateful Eight is okay... I have problems with the story, though. What's the point? It feels like QT is just masturbating... which is okay, at times. I really dislike when he 'narrates'. Also, as I stated in in another thread, I have big problems with the lighting. Not sure what they were thinking there.
- oasisfan35
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4819
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:07 pm
Re: What movies are you watching?
I literally just read who was directing 3 and while I don't feel great about it I also disliked everything Wan did until the first Conjuring. That said Wan had far more than one film under his belt by that point.LoathedVermin72 wrote:They won’t. ACH looks terrible and the La Llorona guy is directing Conjuring 3.oasisfan35 wrote:I feel these two efforts have been more cash-grabs than actually expanding the Conjuring (which is apparently a universe now) narrative effectively. I am hopeful that Annabelle Comes Home and The Conjuring 3 kind of right the ship but we shall see.LoathedVermin72 wrote:The Curse of La Llorona was very boring and bad. Between this and The Nun, I feel like the James Wan era of horror has hit a creative wall. We're ready for something new.
absinthe makes the heart grow fonder...
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: What movies are you watching?
WTF manoasisfan35 wrote:I literally just read who was directing 3 and while I don't feel great about it I also disliked everything Wan did until the first Conjuring. That said Wan had far more than one film under his belt by that point.LoathedVermin72 wrote:They won’t. ACH looks terrible and the La Llorona guy is directing Conjuring 3.oasisfan35 wrote:I feel these two efforts have been more cash-grabs than actually expanding the Conjuring (which is apparently a universe now) narrative effectively. I am hopeful that Annabelle Comes Home and The Conjuring 3 kind of right the ship but we shall see.LoathedVermin72 wrote:The Curse of La Llorona was very boring and bad. Between this and The Nun, I feel like the James Wan era of horror has hit a creative wall. We're ready for something new.
- oasisfan35
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4819
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:07 pm
Re: What movies are you watching?
Should I not be reserving judgment until I see the films?LoathedVermin72 wrote:WTF manoasisfan35 wrote:I literally just read who was directing 3 and while I don't feel great about it I also disliked everything Wan did until the first Conjuring. That said Wan had far more than one film under his belt by that point.LoathedVermin72 wrote:They won’t. ACH looks terrible and the La Llorona guy is directing Conjuring 3.oasisfan35 wrote:I feel these two efforts have been more cash-grabs than actually expanding the Conjuring (which is apparently a universe now) narrative effectively. I am hopeful that Annabelle Comes Home and The Conjuring 3 kind of right the ship but we shall see.LoathedVermin72 wrote:The Curse of La Llorona was very boring and bad. Between this and The Nun, I feel like the James Wan era of horror has hit a creative wall. We're ready for something new.
absinthe makes the heart grow fonder...
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: What movies are you watching?
No I meant because you said you didn’t like any pre-conjuring Wanoasisfan35 wrote:Should I not be reserving judgment until I see the films?LoathedVermin72 wrote:WTF manoasisfan35 wrote:I literally just read who was directing 3 and while I don't feel great about it I also disliked everything Wan did until the first Conjuring. That said Wan had far more than one film under his belt by that point.LoathedVermin72 wrote:They won’t. ACH looks terrible and the La Llorona guy is directing Conjuring 3.oasisfan35 wrote:I feel these two efforts have been more cash-grabs than actually expanding the Conjuring (which is apparently a universe now) narrative effectively. I am hopeful that Annabelle Comes Home and The Conjuring 3 kind of right the ship but we shall see.LoathedVermin72 wrote:The Curse of La Llorona was very boring and bad. Between this and The Nun, I feel like the James Wan era of horror has hit a creative wall. We're ready for something new.
- oasisfan35
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4819
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:07 pm
Re: What movies are you watching?
Take a movie you hate, imagine hating it even more and you might be in the universe of how much I despise Saw.LoathedVermin72 wrote:No I meant because you said you didn’t like any pre-conjuring Wanoasisfan35 wrote:Should I not be reserving judgment until I see the films?LoathedVermin72 wrote:WTF manoasisfan35 wrote:I literally just read who was directing 3 and while I don't feel great about it I also disliked everything Wan did until the first Conjuring. That said Wan had far more than one film under his belt by that point.LoathedVermin72 wrote:They won’t. ACH looks terrible and the La Llorona guy is directing Conjuring 3.oasisfan35 wrote:I feel these two efforts have been more cash-grabs than actually expanding the Conjuring (which is apparently a universe now) narrative effectively. I am hopeful that Annabelle Comes Home and The Conjuring 3 kind of right the ship but we shall see.LoathedVermin72 wrote:The Curse of La Llorona was very boring and bad. Between this and The Nun, I feel like the James Wan era of horror has hit a creative wall. We're ready for something new.
absinthe makes the heart grow fonder...
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: What movies are you watching?
I love Insidious though. It’s way better than The Conjuring.
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20327
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: What movies are you watching?
It all seems so obvious, though. It might be saying a lot but it all feels unnecessary to me, I guess. My wife really likes it. What do you think of the lighting?LoathedVermin72 wrote:If anything, I think H8 has a lot more on its mind thematically than maybe any other QT movie, and it seems way less masturbatory than what he usually does.tree_ wrote:Hateful Eight is okay... I have problems with the story, though. What's the point? It feels like QT is just masturbating... which is okay, at times. I really dislike when he 'narrates'. Also, as I stated in in another thread, I have big problems with the lighting. Not sure what they were thinking there.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: What movies are you watching?
It comes from the same place as the soundtrack.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: What movies are you watching?
STOP TALKING ABOUT THE LIGHTINGtree_ wrote:It all seems so obvious, though. It might be saying a lot but it all feels unnecessary to me, I guess. My wife really likes it. What do you think of the lighting?LoathedVermin72 wrote:If anything, I think H8 has a lot more on its mind thematically than maybe any other QT movie, and it seems way less masturbatory than what he usually does.tree_ wrote:Hateful Eight is okay... I have problems with the story, though. What's the point? It feels like QT is just masturbating... which is okay, at times. I really dislike when he 'narrates'. Also, as I stated in in another thread, I have big problems with the lighting. Not sure what they were thinking there.
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20327
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: What movies are you watching?
Seriously, though... Don't you think it'd be 100X better with natural candle light?LoathedVermin72 wrote:STOP TALKING ABOUT THE LIGHTINGtree_ wrote:It all seems so obvious, though. It might be saying a lot but it all feels unnecessary to me, I guess. My wife really likes it. What do you think of the lighting?LoathedVermin72 wrote:If anything, I think H8 has a lot more on its mind thematically than maybe any other QT movie, and it seems way less masturbatory than what he usually does.tree_ wrote:Hateful Eight is okay... I have problems with the story, though. What's the point? It feels like QT is just masturbating... which is okay, at times. I really dislike when he 'narrates'. Also, as I stated in in another thread, I have big problems with the lighting. Not sure what they were thinking there.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36838
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: What movies are you watching?
One of my favorite things about Hateful Eight is the photography. tree_ is, of course, insane.
theplatypus wrote:I agree with parts of this. In some ways the interiors felt more expansive than the scenery, with the distance between each side of the room underlying racial and political divides. I thought Richardson's "bag of tricks" approach (split diopter, rack focus, depth of field) was effective and evocative, and the scenery was pretty enough to look at that I didn't mind the relative redundancy of the format. It is an odd movie though.LoathedVermin72 wrote: The more I think about the visual choices in this movie, the less sense they make. Why did he shoot in such a grand format? What was the point? Nature can be used to do a lot of things in film - to glorify (or even apotheosize) the world or the human condition, or, conversely, to emphasize the absurdity of the human condition (or behavior or failings) - but QT doesn't seem to be doing...anything with it, really? He certainly isn't glorifying anything, and he enjoys wallowing in the muck of sadistic humor too much to be making an existential point about mankind's place in the world. It just seems like a case of "This is how it looked in my head, so I did it." Which is fine, but ultimately quite shallow. And, this being QT, I'm sure format nostalgia is at play, but even that feels ignorant when QT seems to have no real understanding of how or why better filmmakers of yesteryear used the format in the first place.
This is an endlessly frustrating movie for me. I really don't know how to feel about it.
PS: You should do yourself a favor and familiarize yourself with Lean's work. He's one of the all-time greats.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: What movies are you watching?
This is correct. How are we so far apart on TH8?LoathedVermin72 wrote:I love Insidious though. It’s way better than The Conjuring.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."