Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Books, movies, television...
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Post by Jorge »

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:if i don't see a coens' star wars movie before they die i'm going to kill myself
The Hudsucker Proxy canonically takes place within the Star Wars universe. It was confirmed by Kathleen Kennedy in a very weird press conference
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47966
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

theplatypus wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:if i don't see a coens' star wars movie before they die i'm going to kill myself
The Hudsucker Proxy canonically takes place within the Star Wars universe. It was confirmed by Kathleen Kennedy in a very weird press conference
oh yeah i forgot about that
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Post by epilogue »

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:if i don't see a coens' star wars movie before they die i'm going to kill myself
The Hudsucker Proxy canonically takes place within the Star Wars universe. It was confirmed by Kathleen Kennedy in a very weird press conference
oh yeah i forgot about that
PEW PEW... you know... for kids!
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Post by VinylGuy »

durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:I might see the new Zac Efron movie about Bundy, and i was thinking how weird is that the premiere is on Netflix.
The movie was produced outside its system and got bought by Netflix on Sundance, so in the past this movie could become a hit in theatres maybe? It would be seen in a different light?
People who are still hung up on that will get over it in time.
Would you expand your thoughts on this?
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47966
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:if i don't see a coens' star wars movie before they die i'm going to kill myself
The Hudsucker Proxy canonically takes place within the Star Wars universe. It was confirmed by Kathleen Kennedy in a very weird press conference
oh yeah i forgot about that
PEW PEW... you know... for kids!
lol
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Post by epilogue »

VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:I might see the new Zac Efron movie about Bundy, and i was thinking how weird is that the premiere is on Netflix.
The movie was produced outside its system and got bought by Netflix on Sundance, so in the past this movie could become a hit in theatres maybe? It would be seen in a different light?
People who are still hung up on that will get over it in time.
Would you expand your thoughts on this?
Just what LV reiterated. Theatrical release doesn't matter.
User avatar
tree_
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 20151
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
Twitter: twitter.com/uglyfurballz4life
Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
Contact:

Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Post by tree_ »

It only mattered before home theaters were prevalent
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Post by VinylGuy »

durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:I might see the new Zac Efron movie about Bundy, and i was thinking how weird is that the premiere is on Netflix.
The movie was produced outside its system and got bought by Netflix on Sundance, so in the past this movie could become a hit in theatres maybe? It would be seen in a different light?
People who are still hung up on that will get over it in time.
Would you expand your thoughts on this?
Just what LV reiterated. Theatrical release doesn't matter.
Buy why they dont matter? All you guys are saying is that.

Care to explain?
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33836
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

Why DO they matter? As long as people can watch it, what’s the difference?
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Post by VinylGuy »

ey i ask first
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Post by epilogue »

VinylGuy wrote:ey i ask first
So then you think art only counts if it's mass produced and mass consumed in public in a large format at a cost?
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Post by Mickey »

I read every iteration of SW in this thread as "sex worker" just fyi
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45831
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Post by BurtReynolds »

In the future, all art will just be different iterations of Star Wars.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33836
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

Image
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Post by Bammer »

Mickey wrote:I read every iteration of SW in this thread as "sex worker" just fyi
:thumbsup:
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Post by VinylGuy »

durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:ey i ask first
So then you think art only counts if it's mass produced and mass consumed in public in a large format at a cost?
Not at all! It seems we are heading that way though.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Is art dead?: a thread about monopoly and consume.

Post by Mickey »

Some of you have never read the Adorno and Horkheimer essay on "The Culture Industry" and it shows.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Post Reply