HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
I thought for sure they were gonna hint there were still dead up there. Like the cycle begins again crap.
- darth_vedder
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Tryion, Sansa, and Arya, and pretty much the entire north would have been on her hit list.Monkey_Driven wrote:She wasn't going to kill everyone.darth_vedder wrote:I wouldn't call that a cold blood murder. He prevented a tyrant from killing all the people in Westeros then is banished for it.Monkey_Driven wrote:Jon murdered a queen in cold blood. There were allies of Dany in that council meeting to determine the next king. There has to be some sort of punishment to appease them and to have justice.
- darth_vedder
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Not everyone though.darth_vedder wrote:Tryion, Sansa, and Arya, and pretty much the entire north would have been on her hit list.Monkey_Driven wrote:She wasn't going to kill everyone.darth_vedder wrote:I wouldn't call that a cold blood murder. He prevented a tyrant from killing all the people in Westeros then is banished for it.Monkey_Driven wrote:Jon murdered a queen in cold blood. There were allies of Dany in that council meeting to determine the next king. There has to be some sort of punishment to appease them and to have justice.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Yup. Again this is what has been wrong this season. Weak storytelling. Glossed over. Rushed. Not fleshed out. I don’t hate the story choices - just how they get there.darth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
The conclusion of that council was that merit is a better form of choosing a ruler than bloodlinesdarth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
The point is she would destroy anyone who doesn’t bend the knee to her. A tyrant like those before her. She was no different and that is exactly what her campaign for president was about.Monkey_Driven wrote:Not everyone though.darth_vedder wrote:Tryion, Sansa, and Arya, and pretty much the entire north would have been on her hit list.Monkey_Driven wrote:She wasn't going to kill everyone.darth_vedder wrote:I wouldn't call that a cold blood murder. He prevented a tyrant from killing all the people in Westeros then is banished for it.Monkey_Driven wrote:Jon murdered a queen in cold blood. There were allies of Dany in that council meeting to determine the next king. There has to be some sort of punishment to appease them and to have justice.
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
It’s amazing to me that people are still judging this story based on fantasy tropes that it has always set out to contrast.
- darth_vedder
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Yeah, just 75% of themMonkey_Driven wrote:Not everyone though.darth_vedder wrote:Tryion, Sansa, and Arya, and pretty much the entire north would have been on her hit list.Monkey_Driven wrote:She wasn't going to kill everyone.darth_vedder wrote:I wouldn't call that a cold blood murder. He prevented a tyrant from killing all the people in Westeros then is banished for it.Monkey_Driven wrote:Jon murdered a queen in cold blood. There were allies of Dany in that council meeting to determine the next king. There has to be some sort of punishment to appease them and to have justice.
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Right, but raising Jon up to the throne would ignore her allies that still remain (Dorne, Iron Islands, etc.).Strat wrote:The point is she would destroy anyone who doesn’t bend the knee to her. A tyrant like those before her. She was no different and that is exactly what her campaign for president was about.Monkey_Driven wrote:Not everyone though.darth_vedder wrote:Tryion, Sansa, and Arya, and pretty much the entire north would have been on her hit list.Monkey_Driven wrote:She wasn't going to kill everyone.darth_vedder wrote:I wouldn't call that a cold blood murder. He prevented a tyrant from killing all the people in Westeros then is banished for it.Monkey_Driven wrote:Jon murdered a queen in cold blood. There were allies of Dany in that council meeting to determine the next king. There has to be some sort of punishment to appease them and to have justice.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
The show is pretty clear that love is a weakness. So, sending Jon to "the only place he had found love" is a bit of a mixed message at best, and a curse at worst.darth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
The best (and to my mind only satisfying) ending to Jon Snow was death. And yet going into this episode, I knew he would not die. That was clear and therefore, I was totally prepared for an unsatisfying ending to his story. It wasn't too big a pill to swallow for me.
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
The population of the North was small to begin with, but even smaller after all the battles.darth_vedder wrote:Yeah, just 75% of themMonkey_Driven wrote:Not everyone though.darth_vedder wrote:Tryion, Sansa, and Arya, and pretty much the entire north would have been on her hit list.Monkey_Driven wrote:She wasn't going to kill everyone.darth_vedder wrote:I wouldn't call that a cold blood murder. He prevented a tyrant from killing all the people in Westeros then is banished for it.Monkey_Driven wrote:Jon murdered a queen in cold blood. There were allies of Dany in that council meeting to determine the next king. There has to be some sort of punishment to appease them and to have justice.
- darth_vedder
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
I get that, and regardless of bloodlines, Jon should have been under consideration. He brings people together, is a natural leader, and a war hero. Additionally, he has the name.Mecca wrote:The conclusion of that council was that merit is a better form of choosing a ruler than bloodlinesdarth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
I was just happy to see his flowing locks flapping in the cold winds of the north again. None of the samurai pony crap.
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
he still murdered someonedarth_vedder wrote:I get that, and regardless of bloodlines, Jon should have been under consideration. He brings people together, is a natural leader, and a war hero. Additionally, he has the name.Mecca wrote:The conclusion of that council was that merit is a better form of choosing a ruler than bloodlinesdarth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
- darth_vedder
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
So did pretty much everyone else, yet they are rewarded. Bronn gets Highgarden, Tyrion is Hand again, they are both murderers.Mecca wrote:he still murdered someonedarth_vedder wrote:I get that, and regardless of bloodlines, Jon should have been under consideration. He brings people together, is a natural leader, and a war hero. Additionally, he has the name.Mecca wrote:The conclusion of that council was that merit is a better form of choosing a ruler than bloodlinesdarth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21560
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
"Daenerys Targaryen murdered scores of thousands of innocent people to try and take the throne, and we have come up with a new system to put leaders on the throne that the people can trust. Please welcome your new king...Aegon Targaryen."darth_vedder wrote:I get that, and regardless of bloodlines, Jon should have been under consideration. He brings people together, is a natural leader, and a war hero. Additionally, he has the name.Mecca wrote:The conclusion of that council was that merit is a better form of choosing a ruler than bloodlinesdarth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
ALSimple Torture wrote:"Daenerys Targaryen murdered scores of thousands of innocent people to try and take the throne, and we have come up with a new system to put leaders on the throne that the people can trust. Please welcome your new king...Aegon Targaryen."darth_vedder wrote:I get that, and regardless of bloodlines, Jon should have been under consideration. He brings people together, is a natural leader, and a war hero. Additionally, he has the name.Mecca wrote:The conclusion of that council was that merit is a better form of choosing a ruler than bloodlinesdarth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
- darth_vedder
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Yep, regardless of name / bloodlines, Jon would have been a good candidate. He then politely refuses, and goes north (not because he was banished).Simple Torture wrote:"Daenerys Targaryen murdered scores of thousands of innocent people to try and take the throne, and we have come up with a new system to put leaders on the throne that the people can trust. Please welcome your new king...Aegon Targaryen."darth_vedder wrote:I get that, and regardless of bloodlines, Jon should have been under consideration. He brings people together, is a natural leader, and a war hero. Additionally, he has the name.Mecca wrote:The conclusion of that council was that merit is a better form of choosing a ruler than bloodlinesdarth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
And that is one of the things that felt so wrong about that scene. Everyone there is there because of bloodlines, likely with a lot of unhappy peasants back home, they are just going to flip to some kind of electoral system just like that and not think that they are going to get the same treatment applied to them and their families? At least Sam should remember what democracy lead to at the Wall when Jon got elected.Mecca wrote:The conclusion of that council was that merit is a better form of choosing a ruler than bloodlinesdarth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."