Duty is the death of love. Jon ended up on the opposing side from both women he ever loved, stabbing one in the heart for the greater good. Returning to a place of duty seemed fitting to me.durdencommatyler wrote:The show is pretty clear that love is a weakness. So, sending Jon to "the only place he had found love" is a bit of a mixed message at best, and a curse at worst.darth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
The best (and to my mind only satisfying) ending to Jon Snow was death. And yet going into this episode, I knew he would not die. That was clear and therefore, I was totally prepared for an unsatisfying ending to his story. It wasn't too big a pill to swallow for me.
HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
You gotta let go, darthdarth_vedder wrote:Yep, regardless of name / bloodlines, Jon would have been a good candidate. He then politely refuses, and goes north (not because he was banished).Simple Torture wrote:"Daenerys Targaryen murdered scores of thousands of innocent people to try and take the throne, and we have come up with a new system to put leaders on the throne that the people can trust. Please welcome your new king...Aegon Targaryen."darth_vedder wrote:I get that, and regardless of bloodlines, Jon should have been under consideration. He brings people together, is a natural leader, and a war hero. Additionally, he has the name.Mecca wrote:The conclusion of that council was that merit is a better form of choosing a ruler than bloodlinesdarth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
It would’ve been less believable if they went from monarchy directly to democracyBi_3 wrote:And that is one of the things that felt so wrong about that scene. Everyone there is there because of bloodlines, likely with a lot of unhappy peasants back home, they are just going to flip to some kind of electoral system just like that and not think that they are going to get the same treatment applied to them and their families? At least Sam should remember what democracy lead to at the Wall when Jon got elected.Mecca wrote:The conclusion of that council was that merit is a better form of choosing a ruler than bloodlinesdarth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Correct.Mecca wrote:It would’ve been less believable if they went from monarchy directly to democracyBi_3 wrote:And that is one of the things that felt so wrong about that scene. Everyone there is there because of bloodlines, likely with a lot of unhappy peasants back home, they are just going to flip to some kind of electoral system just like that and not think that they are going to get the same treatment applied to them and their families? At least Sam should remember what democracy lead to at the Wall when Jon got elected.Mecca wrote:The conclusion of that council was that merit is a better form of choosing a ruler than bloodlinesdarth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Sure. I can appreciate that take. Seems fair. Put I would say, only up to a point. He can (and it makes sense that he does) return to a place of duty. But he can die and still have that be true. His exile feel hollow to me, regardless of your point.Mecca wrote:Duty is the death of love. Jon ended up on the opposing side from both women he ever loved, stabbing one in the heart for the greater good. Returning to a place of duty seemed fitting to me.durdencommatyler wrote:The show is pretty clear that love is a weakness. So, sending Jon to "the only place he had found love" is a bit of a mixed message at best, and a curse at worst.darth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
The best (and to my mind only satisfying) ending to Jon Snow was death. And yet going into this episode, I knew he would not die. That was clear and therefore, I was totally prepared for an unsatisfying ending to his story. It wasn't too big a pill to swallow for me.
- darth_vedder
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
You are probably right, I just don't like that he was banished for something that he had to do. Other than that, I was fine with him going back up north.Mecca wrote:You gotta let go, darthdarth_vedder wrote:Yep, regardless of name / bloodlines, Jon would have been a good candidate. He then politely refuses, and goes north (not because he was banished).Simple Torture wrote:"Daenerys Targaryen murdered scores of thousands of innocent people to try and take the throne, and we have come up with a new system to put leaders on the throne that the people can trust. Please welcome your new king...Aegon Targaryen."darth_vedder wrote:I get that, and regardless of bloodlines, Jon should have been under consideration. He brings people together, is a natural leader, and a war hero. Additionally, he has the name.Mecca wrote:The conclusion of that council was that merit is a better form of choosing a ruler than bloodlinesdarth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.

- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Maybe his exile is actually purgatorydurdencommatyler wrote:Sure. I can appreciate that take. Seems fair. Put I would say, only up to a point. He can (and it makes sense that he does) return to a place of duty. But he can die and still have that be true. His exile feel hollow to me, regardless of your point.Mecca wrote:Duty is the death of love. Jon ended up on the opposing side from both women he ever loved, stabbing one in the heart for the greater good. Returning to a place of duty seemed fitting to me.durdencommatyler wrote:The show is pretty clear that love is a weakness. So, sending Jon to "the only place he had found love" is a bit of a mixed message at best, and a curse at worst.darth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
The best (and to my mind only satisfying) ending to Jon Snow was death. And yet going into this episode, I knew he would not die. That was clear and therefore, I was totally prepared for an unsatisfying ending to his story. It wasn't too big a pill to swallow for me.
- washing machine
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15666
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
- Location: Space City
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Did anyone else immediately think of Tetra from Wind Waker during the shots of Arya sailing west?
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
i see what you did thereMecca wrote:Maybe his exile is actually purgatorydurdencommatyler wrote:Sure. I can appreciate that take. Seems fair. Put I would say, only up to a point. He can (and it makes sense that he does) return to a place of duty. But he can die and still have that be true. His exile feel hollow to me, regardless of your point.Mecca wrote:Duty is the death of love. Jon ended up on the opposing side from both women he ever loved, stabbing one in the heart for the greater good. Returning to a place of duty seemed fitting to me.durdencommatyler wrote:The show is pretty clear that love is a weakness. So, sending Jon to "the only place he had found love" is a bit of a mixed message at best, and a curse at worst.darth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
The best (and to my mind only satisfying) ending to Jon Snow was death. And yet going into this episode, I knew he would not die. That was clear and therefore, I was totally prepared for an unsatisfying ending to his story. It wasn't too big a pill to swallow for me.
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28035
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Yes!washing machine wrote:Did anyone else immediately think of Tetra from Wind Waker during the shots of Arya sailing west?
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15498
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
i asked this a long time ago. careful -- the natives here will get angry at you posing otherwise legitimate questions.McParadigm wrote:What is the wall/Night’s Watch protecting them from now?
- washing machine
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15666
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
- Location: Space City
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
The best spinoff from this series would probably be a video game with some variation on that. I could see that being cool, with the added bonus of not really tarnishing the canon and legacy of the story too much.Monkey_Driven wrote:Yes!washing machine wrote:Did anyone else immediately think of Tetra from Wind Waker during the shots of Arya sailing west?
- Spoiler: show
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
- darth_vedder
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
They should have destroyed the wall, and just made it a prison camp for all the awful people like Jon.Chris_H_2 wrote:i asked this a long time ago. careful -- the natives here will get angry at you posing otherwise legitimate questions.McParadigm wrote:What is the wall/Night’s Watch protecting them from now?
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
I don’t think wildlings will just go back to completely civil peopleChris_H_2 wrote:i asked this a long time ago. careful -- the natives here will get angry at you posing otherwise legitimate questions.McParadigm wrote:What is the wall/Night’s Watch protecting them from now?
- darth_vedder
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Jon will be their king beyond the wall and keep them in line.Mecca wrote:I don’t think wildlings will just go back to completely civil peopleChris_H_2 wrote:i asked this a long time ago. careful -- the natives here will get angry at you posing otherwise legitimate questions.McParadigm wrote:What is the wall/Night’s Watch protecting them from now?
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Can you explain? I'm lost.durdencommatyler wrote:i see what you did thereMecca wrote:Maybe his exile is actually purgatorydurdencommatyler wrote:Sure. I can appreciate that take. Seems fair. Put I would say, only up to a point. He can (and it makes sense that he does) return to a place of duty. But he can die and still have that be true. His exile feel hollow to me, regardless of your point.Mecca wrote:Duty is the death of love. Jon ended up on the opposing side from both women he ever loved, stabbing one in the heart for the greater good. Returning to a place of duty seemed fitting to me.durdencommatyler wrote:The show is pretty clear that love is a weakness. So, sending Jon to "the only place he had found love" is a bit of a mixed message at best, and a curse at worst.darth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
The best (and to my mind only satisfying) ending to Jon Snow was death. And yet going into this episode, I knew he would not die. That was clear and therefore, I was totally prepared for an unsatisfying ending to his story. It wasn't too big a pill to swallow for me.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Look dude, I don't have time to give you a crash course in this right now. I don't mean to strand you on an island. But I'm just too busy to sit here and press buttons all day.Bi_3 wrote:Can you explain? I'm lost.durdencommatyler wrote:i see what you did thereMecca wrote:Maybe his exile is actually purgatorydurdencommatyler wrote:Sure. I can appreciate that take. Seems fair. Put I would say, only up to a point. He can (and it makes sense that he does) return to a place of duty. But he can die and still have that be true. His exile feel hollow to me, regardless of your point.Mecca wrote:Duty is the death of love. Jon ended up on the opposing side from both women he ever loved, stabbing one in the heart for the greater good. Returning to a place of duty seemed fitting to me.durdencommatyler wrote:The show is pretty clear that love is a weakness. So, sending Jon to "the only place he had found love" is a bit of a mixed message at best, and a curse at worst.darth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
The best (and to my mind only satisfying) ending to Jon Snow was death. And yet going into this episode, I knew he would not die. That was clear and therefore, I was totally prepared for an unsatisfying ending to his story. It wasn't too big a pill to swallow for me.
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21560
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
I can't believe Jon was dead the entire time.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
But why go there at all? A sudden pledge to remake the entire system of governance seems wrong in a show that was all about the ideological battle of how the ruling class should work and the infighting associated with that (sopranos with swords).Monkey_Driven wrote:Correct.Mecca wrote:It would’ve been less believable if they went from monarchy directly to democracyBi_3 wrote:And that is one of the things that felt so wrong about that scene. Everyone there is there because of bloodlines, likely with a lot of unhappy peasants back home, they are just going to flip to some kind of electoral system just like that and not think that they are going to get the same treatment applied to them and their families? At least Sam should remember what democracy lead to at the Wall when Jon got elected.Mecca wrote:The conclusion of that council was that merit is a better form of choosing a ruler than bloodlinesdarth_vedder wrote:I didn't mind any of that. Just the way that council glossed over the fact that he is the true heir... I think he should have been presented with the option of king then turn it down and go north. It was close, but I felt like after all the work he did that they just left him out to dry and moved on without him.Bi_3 wrote:He ended up where he had been happiest, the only place he had found love, so yeah I don't see it as too bad. It's a wonderful parallel with Ned's original choice as well.bada wrote:Didn't Jon end up right where he would have wanted anyway? If he could have chosen? Doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.
Cut the scene and the need to have someone on the throne just have the small council be like "WTF do we do now?" as Grey Worm sails off...
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
So wait, on balance, what is RM's opinion of the finale?
Just respond to this post with the word "Good" or "Bad". DON'T GET INTO DETAILS
Just respond to this post with the word "Good" or "Bad". DON'T GET INTO DETAILS
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.