digster wrote:That being said, I think the degree to which they've put out shit records is a bit overstated.
I'd say it's a lot overstated.
It's not that I don't recognize what people mean when they say the records have gone downhill. There is a workmanlike lack of "spark" to all of the albums from "Wilco (The Album)" on that I think is undeniable -- they feel a bit flat, obligatory, like records made by a working live band whose job it is to occasionally make records. In most cases, I think the songwriting is generally stronger, the sonics more innovative, etc., than they are on the likes of "Being There," but the records lack a certain joie-de-vivre and sense of discovery that made the earlier records feel like such a trip. The Nels-era records (with the exception of "Sky Blue Sky") don't necessarily invite you into them the same way the Bennett-era albums do.
But I don't necessarily think that means they're inherently weaker records. I think YHF" and "Ghost" are their clear peaks, but the differences between all their other albums on either side are pretty academic. I can understand why someone's ears might gravitate towards "Being There" over, say, "Schmilco," but to me the latter reflects a perfectly developed, matured version of the former -- nothing at all in the songs themselves to indicate that the band has somehow lost their way, or hit some inspirational brick wall.
As an aside, I think "I'll Fight" and "Capitol City" are both among my favorite Nels-era songs. "Capitol City" reminds me of a cross between the Grateful Dead (the chorus puts me in mind of "Mississippi Half-Step Uptown Toodeloo"), Randy Newman (it has a bounce not unlike "Political Science," which Wilco covered regularly at one point), and great-American-songbook stuff -- I find it garishly irresistible.