Election 2020

[run2death]

Nope.

TX is 20 years from flipping blue.

[WtOB?]

Tulsi hangs out with Assad. I don't buy her act at all.

meeting with a world leader? how very unpresidential!

You need to do a Tulsi deep dive bro. She ain't it.

10/10 would bang tho

i’ve dived plenty deep m8.

So you're comfortable that at best she allowed herself to be manipulated by Assad and at worst sympathizes with him?

And if that's all fine with you how about her history as a homophobe?

i reject your first hypothesis and her record in congress has not pointed to any homophobia whatsoever. i couldn’t care less if her father was a christian homophobe at some point in his life. she’s the only person with any hope of coming close to beating trump.

You're drunk

you’re right, none of them can beat trump.

[verb_to_trust]

Tulsi hangs out with Assad. I don't buy her act at all.

meeting with a world leader? how very unpresidential!

You need to do a Tulsi deep dive bro. She ain't it.

10/10 would bang tho

i’ve dived plenty deep m8.

So you're comfortable that at best she allowed herself to be manipulated by Assad and at worst sympathizes with him?

And if that's all fine with you how about her history as a homophobe?

i reject your first hypothesis and her record in congress has not pointed to any homophobia whatsoever. i couldn’t care less if her father was a christian homophobe at some point in his life. she’s the only person with any hope of coming close to beating trump.

You're drunk

you’re right, none of them can beat trump.

Whatever you say Crocodile Dundee

[bart]

A “christian homophobe?” So your research did not include reading about the faux Hindu cult her family is still associated with?

[WtOB?]

A “christian homophobe?” So your research did not include reading about the faux Hindu cult her family is still associated with?

her family isn’t running for pres, bro. she’s been given a 100% rating for her actual actions in congress by the human rights campaign, if actual policy decisions mean anything to you.

[WtOB?]

Tulsi hangs out with Assad. I don't buy her act at all.

meeting with a world leader? how very unpresidential!

You need to do a Tulsi deep dive bro. She ain't it.

10/10 would bang tho

i’ve dived plenty deep m8.

So you're comfortable that at best she allowed herself to be manipulated by Assad and at worst sympathizes with him?

And if that's all fine with you how about her history as a homophobe?

i reject your first hypothesis and her record in congress has not pointed to any homophobia whatsoever. i couldn’t care less if her father was a christian homophobe at some point in his life. she’s the only person with any hope of coming close to beating trump.

You're drunk

you’re right, none of them can beat trump.

Whatever you say Crocodile Dundee

heh. you’ll see.

[bart]

A “christian homophobe?” So your research did not include reading about the faux Hindu cult her family is still associated with?

her family isn’t running for pres, bro. she’s been given a 100% rating for her actual actions in congress by the human rights campaign, if actual policy decisions mean anything to you.

You don’t think her support from and for Hindutva groups is in any part a reflection of the cult she’s still a member of?

[bart]

I mean I’m sure your deep dive covered all this, right?

[washing machine]

Particularly, know-it-all Instructional Designers, who think Captivate is the be-all, end-all of human interaction.

A deep dive into the roots of this obscure jab somehow lead me to one of the greatest 96up posts I'd never read.

[Bammer]

Particularly, know-it-all Instructional Designers, who think Captivate is the be-all, end-all of human interaction.

A deep dive into the roots of this obscure jab somehow lead me to one of the greatest 96up posts I'd never read.

I would love to see that post. Quote it.

I’m not paying enough attention here to pinpoint who is who, but I just get the general sense that there are multiple RMers here in this thread over the past 2-3 pages that do not want a female president. You won’t say it in those words, but there’s an underlying tone.

[McParadigm]

[McParadigm]

Pennsylvania voters feel economically better off, and yet...

The August 2019 Franklin & Marshall College Poll finds that Pennsylvania voters are generally satisfied with the direction of the state and their personal finances. Half (51%) of the state’s registered voters believe the state is “headed in the right direction.” Most voters report they are “better off” (29%) or the “same” (55%) financially compared to last year and most expect to be “better off” (28%) or the “same” (58%) financially next year.

About one in three (37%) registered voters in Pennsylvania believes President Trump is doing an “excellent” or “good” job as president, which is consistent with recent Franklin & Marshall College Polls. Two in five (38%) registered voters believes President Trump has done a good enough job to deserve re- election, while three in five (61%) voters say it is time for a change and four in five (85%) of these voters say they will vote against the President no matter who runs against him. Taken together, half (51%) of registered voters are firmly supporting a change and a quarter (29%) are firmly supporting no change, leaving another quarter who are still deciding.

[McParadigm]

We really don’t acknowledge enough how difficult it is to have these kinds of disapproval numbers without the context of pronounced, national economic hardship.

[BurtReynolds]

Biden needs to hang it up.

[Mickey]

[verb_to_trust]

Somehow, he'll still lead in the polls. Hopefully the more Biden talks the more people will realize his brain senile mush at this point.

[Mickey]

Not to deny that Biden is a clueless old geezer who needs to be sent to a farm upstate, but to a certain extent he's always been like this.

[Simple Torture]

Not to deny that Biden is a clueless old geezer who needs to be sent to a farm upstate, but to a certain extent he's always been like this.

Around the time of the first debate, (trigger warning!) Nate Silver asked on a podcast, "Has everyone forgotten that Joe Biden has run for president twice before and was awful both times?" It's stuck with me as Biden has continued to ass-backwards his way forward as the presumptive nominee.

[Mickey]

Not to deny that Biden is a clueless old geezer who needs to be sent to a farm upstate, but to a certain extent he's always been like this.

Around the time of the first debate, (trigger warning!) Nate Silver asked on a podcast, "Has everyone forgotten that Joe Biden has run for president twice before and was awful both times?" It's stuck with me as Biden has continued to ass-backwards his way forward as the presumptive nominee.

I honestly think a lot of it is people just recognizing his name when they get polled, and I'm cautiously optimistic that the kind of people who show up to a caucus spells the end of the Biden campaign by Iowa.

[Mickey]

Of course the other part is that most people have gerbils in their skulls so a guy who got laughed out of the 88 race for literally a lifetime of plagiarism is now the serious contender.